IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7930-d1741312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Shaping the Business Development of the Alternative Protein Transition: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Samoggia

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Chiara Benussi

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Macaione

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Alternative proteins (APs) have the potential to contribute to the sustainable transition of food systems. This study aims to assess the current stage of development of the alternative protein industry, identifying factors, both barriers and enablers, that influence business growth. The analysis adopts a systematic literature review, following the PRISMA guidelines, identifying 50 studies. The S-curve model is then applied as an analytical tool to determine the development stage of the AP industry concerning plant-based, insect, and algae segments. The application of the S-curve provides a perspective on the evolution of innovative business such as AP. The results reveal significant differences in the maturity of the AP industry. The plant-based one is the most advanced, characterized by strong market organization and collaborations, despite challenges such as price competitiveness. The algae industry is promising due to its versatility, yet it is hindered due to production costs and unstable demand. Insects face the greatest barriers, including consumer acceptance and ethical concerns. The study emphasizes the importance of creating business strategies suited to each AP source to transform barriers into opportunities. This review contributes to the literature by comparing the unique peculiarities of the AP industry and providing insights from a cross-analysis of plant-based, algae, and insect development stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Samoggia & Chiara Benussi & Giuseppe Macaione, 2025. "Factors Shaping the Business Development of the Alternative Protein Transition: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7930-:d:1741312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Marberg, Angela & van Kranenburg, Hans & Korzilius, Hubert, 2017. "The big bug: The legitimation of the edible insect sector in the Netherlands," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 111-123.
    3. Palatnik, Ruslana Rachel & Freer, Mikhail & Levin, Mark & Golberg, Alexander & Zilberman, David, 2023. "Algae-Based Two-Stage Supply Chain with Co-Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Ortega, David L. & Sun, Jiayu & Lin, Wen, 2022. "Identity labels as an instrument to reduce meat demand and encourage consumption of plant based and cultured meat alternatives in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Rhys Manners & Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Ana M. Tarquis, 2020. "Transitioning European Protein-Rich Food Consumption and Production towards More Sustainable Patterns—Strategies and Policy Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Emina Kristina Petrović, 2023. "Sustainability Transition Framework: An Integrated Conceptualisation of Sustainability Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Luiz Morais-da-Silva, Rodrigo & Glufke Reis, Germano & Sanctorum, Hermes & Forte Maiolino Molento, Carla, 2022. "The social impacts of a transition from conventional to cultivated and plant-based meats: Evidence from Brazil," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Jaqueline Geisa Cunha Gomes & Marcelo Tsuguio Okano & Edson Luiz Ursini & Henry de Castro Lobo dos Santos, 2023. "Insect Production for Animal Feed: A Multiple Case Study in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Donkor, Emmanuel & Mbeche, Robert & Mithöfer, Dagmar, . "Strategic business decisions of retailers in the edible insect value chain in Uganda," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Adam A. Prag & Christian B. Henriksen, 2020. "Transition from Animal-Based to Plant-Based Food Production to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture—The Case of Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Nuno Aluai Carvalho & Maria da Conceição Martins, 2024. "Education to Promote Healthy and Sustainable Eating Habits: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Eili Skrivervik, 2018. "The Bioeconomy and Food Waste: Insects’ Contribution," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20181021, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    5. Rodrigo Luiz Morais-da-Silva & Eduardo Guedes Villar & Germano Glufke Reis & Hermes Sanctorum & Carla Forte Maiolino Molento, 2022. "The expected impact of cultivated and plant-based meats on jobs: the views of experts from Brazil, the United States and Europe," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Sunil P. Dhoubhadel & William Ridley, 2025. "China's meat sector growth and U.S. grain and oilseed exports," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 275-303, March.
    7. Reis, Germano Glufke & Villar, Eduardo Guedes & Prado Gimenez, Fernando Antonio & Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte & Ferri, Priscila, 2022. "The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Meike Rombach & David Dean & Frank Vriesekoop & Bin Jiang & Zeyuan Zhou & Wendy Hao & Wim Koning, 2025. "Understanding factors determining Chinese consumer’s willingness to eat cultured meat, insect, and plant-based proteins," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(1), pages 77-109, March.
    9. Andrea Boccardo & Geoffrey Hagelaar & Catriona Lakemond, 2023. "Evaluation of crises suitability of food systems: a comparison of alternative protein sources," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(6), pages 1647-1665, December.
    10. Susana De Leon Siller & Temitope Awobusuyi & John Wolodko & Wendy Wismer, 2025. "A Conjoint Analysis Evaluation of Consumer Perspectives on Cricket-Based Snacks: A Case Study for Alberta, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Sepide Mehrabi & Cynthia Giagnocavo, 2024. "Business models and strategies for the internalization of externalities in agri-food value chains," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-36, December.
    12. Altmann, Brianne A. & Anders, Sven & Risius, Antje & Mörlein, Daniel, 2022. "Information effects on consumer preferences for alternative animal feedstuffs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Katalin Szendrő, 2025. "Consumer perceptions of lab-grown cells: Awareness, barriers, and the power of information. A review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(6), pages 203-222.
    14. Diana Bogueva & Maria Marques & Carla Forte Maiolino Molento & Dora Marinova & Clive J. C. Phillips, 2023. "Will the Cows and Chickens Come Home? Perspectives of Australian and Brazilian Beef and Poultry Farmers towards Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-37, August.
    15. Castellani, Paola & Cassia, Fabio & Vargas-Sánchez, Alfonso & Giaretta, Elena, 2025. "Food innovation towards a sustainable world: A study on intention to purchase lab-grown meat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Joina Ijuniclair Arruda Silva dos Santos & Alan Bandeira Pinheiro & Paulo Henrique Muller Prado & Marconi Freitas da Costa, 2024. "Unveiling Consumer Perspectives of Plant-Based Meats: Insights from a Comprehensive Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Shamila Nabi Khan & Nayab Minhas & Nathan Neale, 2025. "Bridging the green gap: examining consumer green perceptions in an extended model of theory of planned behavior," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Sanne K. Djojosoeparto & Muriel C. D. Verain & Hanna Schebesta & Sander Biesbroek & Maartje P. Poelman & Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2025. "Harnessing the potential of public procurement for the protein transition – perceived barriers and facilitators," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 351-368, March.
    19. Daniel Velden & Joost Dessein & Laurens Klerkx & Lies Debruyne, 2023. "Constructing legitimacy for technologies developed in response to environmental regulation: the case of ammonia emission-reducing technology for the Flemish intensive livestock industry," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 649-665, June.
    20. Rao Yuan & Shaosheng Jin & Lin Zhou & Hsiaoping Chien & Wenchao Wu, 2025. "Promoting eco‐labeled food consumption in China: The role of information," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 401-423, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7930-:d:1741312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.