IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7909-d1740852.html

Exploring the Rich Tapestry of Intellectual Capital in the Sustainable Development of an Expanded BRICS+ Bloc

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno S. Sergi

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Elena G. Popkova

    (Laboratory of Scientometrics and International Rankings, Armenian State University of Economics, Yerevan 0025, Armenia)

  • Mikuláš Sidak

    (Institute of Public Administration, Bratislava University of Economics and Management, 851 04 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Stanislav Bencic

    (Faculty of Media, Pan European University, 821 02 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

This paper contributes conceptually and empirically to a more rigorous understanding of the role of intellectual capital in the sustainable development of the BRICS+ bloc. We investigate the growing command of technical competencies over social competencies across the entire knowledge process. A range of factors, including the ever-increasing tension between AI and humans, the multidimensional nature of intellectual capital, and a focus on competency-based approaches, shape the theory of a knowledge economy. This study presents a spatial modeling approach to analyze the sustainable development of economic systems, reevaluates the importance of intellectual capital in the era of Industry 4.0, introduces the concept of scientific management of intellectual capital by categorizing it into the AI, individual, and collective human mind, and enhances the methodology of managing the knowledge economy to foster intellectual capital development. The primary finding of the research is that the advancement of the knowledge economy is driving digital communication and network-based collaboration on a larger scale within the BRICS+ bloc. Policy implications are intricately linked to the necessity for the holistic development of intellectual capital, encompassing both human and artificial intelligence. This development requires enhancements in quality of life and living standards, advancements in education and healthcare, optimization of the labor market, and reinforcing its connection with the educational sector. Concurrently, it is vital to stimulate research and development (R&D), support the commercialization of high-tech innovations, and accelerate the process of robotization. These combined efforts are essential to fostering economic growth effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno S. Sergi & Elena G. Popkova & Mikuláš Sidak & Stanislav Bencic, 2025. "Exploring the Rich Tapestry of Intellectual Capital in the Sustainable Development of an Expanded BRICS+ Bloc," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7909-:d:1740852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7909/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7909/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariza Tsakalerou, 2018. "Intellectual property as a key driver of business performance: the case of Singapore and its implications for innovation in a knowledge-based economy," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 83-92.
    2. Pao, Huei-Wen & Wu, Hsueh-Liang & Lee, Cheng-Yu, 2020. "Project interface choice and knowledge creation: Evidence of international science cooperation in Taiwan," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Zhou, Ruoying & Tang, Puay, 2020. "The role of university Knowledge Transfer Offices: Not just commercialize research outputs!," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Kyootai & Jung, Hyun Ju, 2024. "What makes universities build academic spin-offs more successfully? A theory-based triangulation of quantitative studies based on meta-analyses," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    2. Borrás, Susana & Gerli, Francesco & Cenzato, Rebecca, 2024. "Technology transfer offices in the diffusion of transformative innovation: Rethinking roles, resources, and capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Wang, Wenjing & Lu, Shan, 2021. "University-industry innovation community dynamics and knowledge transfer: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Samira Yusef Araújo Falani Bezerra & Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, 2024. "Technology Transfer Offices: a Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4455-4488, March.
    5. Villani, Elisa & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2024. "When people make the difference: A person-organization fit approach in knowledge transfer offices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Pohle, Anna & Villani, Elisa & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2022. "Personnel motivation in knowledge transfer offices: The role of university-level and organizational-level antecedents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Wenjing Wang & Yiwei Liu, 2022. "Does University-industry innovation community affect firms’ inventions? The mediating role of technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 906-935, June.
    8. Guerrero, Maribel & Pugh, Rhiannon, 2022. "Entrepreneurial universities’ metamorphosis: Encountering technological and emotional disruptions in the COVID-19 ERA," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Ruoying Zhou & Ning Baines, 2024. "To what extent do universities’ formal and informal knowledge exchange activities interact: evidence from UK HE-BCI survey," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1145-1175, August.
    10. Temel, Serdal & Dabić, Marina & Murat Ar, Ilker & Howells, Jeremy & Ali Mert, & Yesilay, Rustem Baris, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between university innovation intermediaries and patenting performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Zhuo Chen & Zhenbing Yang & Lili Yang, 2024. "Analyzing the Knowledge Transfer Performance of China’s Universities: a Heterogeneous Stochastic Frontier Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3975-4003, March.
    12. Ma, Yonghong & Li, Baoxiang, 2022. "Effect of digitalization on knowledge transfer from universities to enterprises: Evidence from postdoctoral workstation of Chinese enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Xing Gao & Senmao Xia & Yu Xiong & Xiaoxian Zhu & Yantao Ling & Mengqiu Cao, 2025. "The underexplored effects of economic transition on intellectual property rights protection: An economic geography perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3313-3347, July.
    14. Svennevik Elisabeth M. C. & Saidi Trust, 2022. "Social innovation-as-practice: establishing a social innovation program at a university," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(s1), pages 402-425, October.
    15. van Burg, Elco & Du, Jingshu & Kers, Jannigje Gerdien, 2021. "When do academics patent outside their university? An in-depth case study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Kalantaridis, Christos & Küttim, Merle, 2023. "Multi-dimensional time and university technology commercialisation as opportunity praxis: A realist synthesis of the accumulated literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7909-:d:1740852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.