IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7906-d1740725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

And Then, There Were None: The Nexus of Agricultural Labor, Migration, and Food Insecurity in Rural and Urban Settings in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Beatrice Fenelon Pierre

    (Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0310, USA)

  • Tracy Anne Irani

    (Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0310, USA)

  • Joy Fatokun

    (Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0310, USA)

Abstract

By 2030, the world population is projected to reach approximately 9.7 billion. One of the core objectives of the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), adopted from the 1996 World Food Summit, is to eradicate hunger by that time, meaning ensuring food security for all. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defines food security as follows: “Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.” Conceptually, it is posited that food security can be understood as a nexus of four elements: Food security = Availability + Access + Utilization + Stability of a food system. This study focused specifically on the food availability component of food security. It addresses a critical gap in the existing literature: the limited understanding of the role farmworkers and their families play in sustaining food systems. Specifically, it explores how the children of Haitian farmworkers in the United States perceive agricultural labor through the lens of their family’s experiences, including their personal willingness to engage in it and their advocacy for others to pursue such work. Although qualitative in nature, this study employed the Political Economy of the Food System, also referred to as Agrifood Systems Theory or the Political Ecology of Food Systems, as its guiding theoretical framework, as it aligns closely with the study’s objectives. The data were collected between December 2022 and June 2023. The sample consisted of eight young adults (ages 18 to 29), all of Haitian descent. Overall, the findings indicated that participants commonly reported feeling a sense of inferiority and a lack of interest in and respect for farmwork as a profession during their upbringing, particularly in comparison to peers from non-farmworker households and those outside of their immediate communities. This sense of inferiority was attributed to several factors, including their upbringing, the inherent vulnerability associated with farm work, and the long-term physical toll agricultural work had on both themselves and their parents. The study’s findings carry important implications for practitioners, scholars, policymakers, and all stakeholders involved in achieving food security. They underscore the urgent need to reform labor policies and improve the conditions surrounding farm work, making it a more appealing, dignified, desirable, and sustainable occupation in the face of a growing world population.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatrice Fenelon Pierre & Tracy Anne Irani & Joy Fatokun, 2025. "And Then, There Were None: The Nexus of Agricultural Labor, Migration, and Food Insecurity in Rural and Urban Settings in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7906-:d:1740725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7906-:d:1740725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.