IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7841-d1738620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enacting Sustainability Through Organizational Routines: A Grounded Theory of Capability–Institution Co-Structuring

Author

Listed:
  • Tung-Shan Liao

    (College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan)

  • Hsin-Pang Lu

    (College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan)

Abstract

In institutional environments characterized by ambiguity and contestation, the formation of sustainability capabilities poses significant interpretive and organizational challenges. Existing perspectives often assume clear mandates, strategic intent, and rational agency, yet such assumptions rarely hold in transitional or weakly institutionalized settings. This study adopts a constructivist grounded theory (CGT) approach to examine how sustainability-related routines emerge, stabilize, and contribute to capability formation under conditions of institutional complexity. Drawing from multiple organizational cases across East Asian contexts, this study identifies three interdependent categories of routines, including sensemaking, stabilization, and coordination, that interact recursively to generate sustainability capabilities. These routines function not as linear processes or technical tools, but as dynamic infrastructures of interpretation, consolidation, and alignment. Their recursive interplay enables organizations to translate ambiguous sustainability signals into patterned practices and symbolic legitimacy over time. We consolidate these insights into a mid-range theoretical framework, the Routines-as-Practice Configuration for Sustainability Structuring (RAPCSS). The RAPCSS explains how sustainability is not merely implemented but enacted and continually remade through situated, performative routines. By bridging strategic and practice-based perspectives, this study contributes to sustainability theory by theorizing capabilities as emergent configurations shaped through recursive routine work. This offers a situated, processual, and reflexive account of how sustainability unfolds under conditions of institutional ambiguity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tung-Shan Liao & Hsin-Pang Lu, 2025. "Enacting Sustainability Through Organizational Routines: A Grounded Theory of Capability–Institution Co-Structuring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7841-:d:1738620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville, 2005. "The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 618-636, December.
    2. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    3. Bejtush Ademi & Alf Steinar Sætre & Nora Johanne Klungseth, 2024. "Advancing the understanding of sustainable business models through organizational learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5174-5194, September.
    4. Cecilia Correggi & Paolo Di Toma & Stefano Ghinoi, 2024. "Rethinking dynamic capabilities in light of sustainability: A bibliometric analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7990-8016, December.
    5. Marcia Frezza & Karen E. White, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Workplace Routines: The Identity and Practice Interdependence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Bulent Menguc & Seigyoung Auh & Lucie Ozanne, 2010. "The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm's Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 279-298, June.
    7. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Quan Anh Nguyen & Gillian Sullivan Mort, 0. "Conceptualising organisational-level and microfoundational capabilities: an integrated view of born-globals’ internationalisation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    3. Torres, Juan Pablo & Barrera, Jose Ignacio & Kunc, Martin & Charters, Steve, 2021. "The dynamics of wine tourism adoption in Chile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 474-485.
    4. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Trinchera, Laura, 2024. "The role of artificial intelligence-enabled dynamic capability on environmental performance: The mediation effect of a data-driven culture in France and the USA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    6. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    7. Peter Ping Li & Shameen Prashantham & Abby Jingzi Zhou & Steven Shijin Zhou, 2022. "Compositional springboarding and EMNE evolution," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 754-766, June.
    8. Insu Cho & Young Hoon Kwak & Jaehyeon Jun, 2019. "Sustainable Idea Development Mechanism in University Technology Commercialization (UTC): Perspectives from Dynamic Capabilities Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Claudia OGREAN, 2025. "Rethinking Dynamic Capabilities For A Digital World: A Bibliometric Analysis Of Emerging Trends And Conceptual Shifts," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 20(1), pages 374-391, April.
    10. Huy-Cuong Vo-Thai & Shihmin Lo & My-Linh Tran, 2021. "How Capability Reconfiguration in Coping With External Dynamism Can Shape the Performance of the Vietnamese Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    11. Haarhaus, Tim & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Cleverton Rodrigues Fernandes & André Gustavo Carvalho Machado, 2019. "Technology Transfer Capability: development dynamics in higher education institutions," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Victoria Eugenia Sanchez-Garcia & Cristina Gallego & Juan Antonio Marquez & Elena Peribáñez, 2024. "The Green Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as an Innovation Factor That Enables the Creation of New Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Desirée Knoppen & Louise Knight, 2022. "Pursuing sustainability advantage: The dynamic capabilities of born sustainable firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1789-1813, May.
    16. Abel Duarte Alonso & Seng K. Kok & Seamus O'Brien, 2019. "Understanding Approaches To Innovation Through The Dynamic Capabilities Lens: A Multi-Country Study Of The Wine Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-30, August.
    17. Laura Carraresi & Xhevrie Mamaqi & Luis Miguel Albisu & Alessandro Banterle, 2016. "Can Strategic Capabilities Affect Performance? Application of RBV to Small Food Businesses," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 416-436, July.
    18. Andrew D. Henderson & Melissa E. Graebner, 2020. "Entering a Golden Age of Sustained Superiority: Entrepreneurial Creation or Discovery?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1432-1451, November.
    19. Michael Yao-Ping Peng, 2025. "The role of international strategic alliance and dynamic internationalization capability in building competitive advantage for SMEs: evidence from Taiwan," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Mo Chen & Aseem Kaul & Brian Wu, 2019. "Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(11), pages 1791-1821, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7841-:d:1738620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.