IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7822-d1738094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regional and Personal Disparities of Global Renewable Energy Use from Four Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • He He

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Zhuanting Wang

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Zekai Jiang

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Tian Liu

    (School of Economics, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, China)

  • Zifei Qin

    (School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

Global climate change demands a rapid transition to renewable energy for sustainable development and carbon neutrality. However, existing frameworks often overlook the dynamics of renewable energy use across production, consumption, final production, and income perspectives of the economy, thereby limiting understanding of global energy transitions. This study addresses this gap using a multi regional input-output (MRIO) model to analyze renewable energy use globally from 2000 to 2021 through multiple perspectives. Our findings reveal significant disparities in renewable energy use across countries. The United States is the largest renewable energy user by four perspectives in 2021, while per capita renewable energy use reveals pronounced disparities, with heavily populated countries like China and India having notably low use levels. Furthermore, resource-exporting countries, as primary suppliers for global renewable energy, promote renewable energy use, making a substantial contribution to the energy transition. Sectoral analysis highlights the significance of electricity, gas, and water industries in renewable energy use. This study provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing renewable energy use, offering valuable insights to policymakers to accelerate equitable and sustainable energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • He He & Zhuanting Wang & Zekai Jiang & Tian Liu & Zifei Qin, 2025. "The Regional and Personal Disparities of Global Renewable Energy Use from Four Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7822-:d:1738094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7822/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7822/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl W. Steininger & Christian Lininger & Lukas H. Meyer & Pablo Muñoz & Thomas Schinko, 2016. "Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 35-41, January.
    2. Li, Zheng & Luan, Ranran & Lin, Boqiang, 2022. "The trend and factors affecting renewable energy distribution and disparity across countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    3. Gaafar Muhammed & Neyre Tekbiyik-Ersoy, 2020. "Development of Renewable Energy in China, USA, and Brazil: A Comparative Study on Renewable Energy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Gozgor, Giray, 2016. "Are shocks to renewable energy consumption permanent or transitory? An empirical investigation for Brazil, China, and India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 913-919.
    5. Yong Liu, 2023. "Energy consumption inequality in China: What can an agent-based model tell us?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(8), pages 3020-3038, December.
    6. Werner, Deborah & Lazaro, Lira Luz Benites, 2023. "The policy dimension of energy transition: The Brazilian case in promoting renewable energies (2000–2022)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Estevão, João & Lopes, José Dias, 2024. "SDG7 and renewable energy consumption: The influence of energy sources," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Brunner, Eric J. & Schwegman, David J., 2022. "Commercial wind energy installations and local economic development: Evidence from U.S. counties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Rocco, Matteo V. & Forcada Ferrer, Rafael J. & Colombo, Emanuela, 2018. "Understanding the energy metabolism of World economies through the joint use of Production- and Consumption-based energy accountings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 590-603.
    10. Lan, Jun & Malik, Arunima & Lenzen, Manfred & McBain, Darian & Kanemoto, Keiichiro, 2016. "A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 436-451.
    11. Susskind, Lawrence & Chun, Jungwoo & Gant, Alexander & Hodgkins, Chelsea & Cohen, Jessica & Lohmar, Sarah, 2022. "Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    12. Li, Menghan & Liu, Xiaoxiao & Yang, Mian, 2024. "Analyzing the regional inequality of renewable energy consumption and its driving factors: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    13. Gibbon, Peter, 2001. "Upgrading Primary Production: A Global Commodity Chain Approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 345-363, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jia Shuo & Zhou, H.W. & Meng, Jing & Yang, Q. & Chen, B. & Zhang, Y.Y., 2018. "Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1076-1086.
    2. Wu, X.D. & Guo, J.L. & Ji, Xi & Chen, G.Q., 2019. "Energy use in world economy from household-consumption-based perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 287-298.
    3. Li, Y.L. & Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2020. "Carbon network embodied in international trade: Global structural evolution and its policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Tan, Ling Min & Arbabi, Hadi & Brockway, Paul E. & Densley Tingley, Danielle & Mayfield, Martin, 2019. "An ecological-thermodynamic approach to urban metabolism: Measuring resource utilization with open system network effectiveness analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Xie, Pinjie & Guo, Weinan & Lin, Xinyi & Shu, Yalin & Sun, Feihu & Huang, Bin, 2025. "Study on the measurement of interprovincial carbon emission performance, regional gaps, and spatial convergence in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    6. Soto, Gonzalo H. & Martinez-Cobas, Xavier, 2025. "Energy poverty and the green energy transition's impact upon income inequality in Latin America," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 220-232.
    7. Wei, Changhe & Wang, Shaobin & Zhao, Xiaofeng, 2025. "Spatial-temporal variation and coupling relationship between primary energy consumption and economic growth: A global assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    8. Wei ZHAO & Rigas ARVANITIS, 2008. "L’INeGAL DeVELOPPEMENT INDUSTRIEL DE LA CHINE : CAPACITeS D’INNOVATION ET COEXISTENCE DE DIFFeRENTS MODES D’APPRENTISSAGE TECHNOLOGIQUE," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 28, pages 61-85.
    9. Mulvaney, Dustin & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2014. "Zero-tolerance for genetic pollution: Rice farming, pharm rice, and the risks of coexistence in California," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 125-131.
    10. Ayako Ebata & Hayley MacGregor & Michael Loevinsohn & Khine Su Win & Alexander W. Tucker, 0. "Value Chain Governance, Power and Negative Externalities: What Influences Efforts to Control Pig Diseases in Myanmar?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    11. Prest, Brian C., 2022. "Partners, Not Rivals: The Power of Parallel Supply-Side and Demand-Side Climate Policy," RFF Reports 22-06, Resources for the Future.
    12. Sukhpal Singh, 2013. "Governance and upgrading in export grape global production networks in India," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series ctg-2013-33, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    13. Li, Penghui & He, Chunyang & Huang, Qingxu & Wang, Yida & Duan, Xiaoyu, 2024. "Metacoupling flow of embodied carbon in resource-based cities: A case study of Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin urban agglomeration in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    14. Shih-Chang Hung & Yung-Ching Tseng, 2017. "Extending the LLL framework through an institution-based view: Acer as a dragon multinational," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 799-821, December.
    15. Wang, Qiang & Han, Xinyu, 2021. "Is decoupling embodied carbon emissions from economic output in Sino-US trade possible?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-496 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ivanova, Diana & Wieland, Hanspeter, 2023. "Tracing carbon footprints to intermediate industries in the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    18. Llop, Maria, 2017. "Changes in energy output in a regional economy: A structural decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 145-151.
    19. repec:osf:osfxxx:bre43_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Kaltenegger, Oliver & Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank, 2017. "The effect of globalisation on energy footprints: Disentangling the links of global value chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(S1), pages 148-168.
    21. Karl Steininger & Pablo Munoz & Jonas Karstensen & Glen Peters & Rita Strohmaier & Erick Velazquez, 2017. "Austria’s Consumption-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Identifying sectoral sources and destinations," EcoMod2017 10472, EcoMod.
    22. Islam, Md. Saidul, 2008. "From pond to plate: Towards a twin-driven commodity chain in Bangladesh shrimp aquaculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 209-223, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7822-:d:1738094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.