IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7791-d1737532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Off-Site Modular Construction and BIM for Sustainable Multifamily Buildings: A Case Study in Rio de Janeiro

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus Q. Vargas

    (Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-240, Brazil)

  • Ana Briga-Sá

    (ECT—School of Science and Technology, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Dieter Boer

    (Departament d’Enginyeria Mecànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain)

  • Mohammad K. Najjar

    (Programa de Engenharia Ambiental, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)

  • Assed N. Haddad

    (Programa de Engenharia Ambiental, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)

Abstract

The construction industry faces persistent challenges, including low productivity, high waste generation, and resistance to technological innovation. Off-site modular construction, supported by Building Information Modeling (BIM), emerges as a promising strategy to address these issues and advance sustainability goals. This study aims to evaluate the practical impacts of industrialized off-site construction in the Brazilian context, focusing on cost, execution time, structural weight, and architectural–logistical constraints. The novelty lies in applying the methodology to a high standard, mixed-use multifamily building, an atypical scenario for modular construction in Brazil, and employing a MultiCriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to integrate results. A detailed case study is developed comparing conventional and off-site construction approaches using BIM-assisted analyses for weight reduction, cost estimates, and schedule optimization. The results show an 89% reduction in structural weight, a 6% decrease in overall costs, and a 40% reduction in project duration when adopting fully off-site solutions. The integration of results was performed through the Weighted Scoring Method (WSM), a form of MCDA chosen for its transparency and adaptability to case studies. While this study defined weights and scores, the framework allows the future incorporation of stakeholder input. Challenges identified include the need for early design integration, transport limitations, and site-specific constraints. By quantifying benefits and limitations, this study contributes to expanding the understanding of off-site modular adaptability of construction projects beyond low-cost housing, demonstrating its potential for diverse projects and advancing its implementation in emerging markets. Beyond technical and economic outcomes, the study also frames off-site modular construction within the three pillars of sustainability. Environmentally, it reduces structural weight, resource consumption, and on-site waste; economically, it improves cost efficiency and project delivery times; and socially, it offers potential benefits such as safer working conditions, reduced urban disruption, and faster provision of community-oriented buildings. These dimensions highlight its broader contribution to sustainable development in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus Q. Vargas & Ana Briga-Sá & Dieter Boer & Mohammad K. Najjar & Assed N. Haddad, 2025. "Integrating Off-Site Modular Construction and BIM for Sustainable Multifamily Buildings: A Case Study in Rio de Janeiro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7791-:d:1737532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josivan Leite Alves & Rachel Perez Palha & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida Filho, 2025. "BIM-Based Framework for Photovoltaic Systems: Advancing Technologies, Overcoming Challenges, and Enhancing Sustainable Building Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-41, April.
    2. Ayaz Ahmad Khan & Mehdi Amirkhani & Igor Martek, 2024. "Overcoming Deterrents to Modular Construction in Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jéssica dos Santos Leite Gonella & Moacir Godinho Filho & Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga & Fabiane Leticia Lizarelli, 2024. "From awareness to action: Understanding the relationship between circular economy and favourable evaluation towards sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8679-8694, December.
    2. Laura Bordoli & Giovanni Scire’ & Francesca Rossi, 2023. "Designing Dynamic Sustainable Business Models to Assess the Feasibility of an Industrial Symbiosis: The Case of the Retro-Port Area of Trieste," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Mazharuddin Syed Ahmed & Rehan Masood, 2025. "Assessment of Sustainable Building Design with Green Star Rating Using BIM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Gilmar dos Santos Marques & Maria Amélia de Paula Dias & José Luiz de Andrade Franco, 2023. "Public Innovation Policy Evaluation: Brazilian Electricity Tariff Paid by Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Maria Soares de Lima & Andres Eberhard Friedl Ackermann & Nelson Kadel & Maria Angela Butturi, 2025. "Exploring Industrial Symbiotic Networks: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons for Future Implementations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7791-:d:1737532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.