IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7786-d1737391.html

An Exploration of the Influence Mechanism of Resource Bricolage and Ambidextrous Learning on Micro-Innovation in New Ventures: The Moderating Roles of Customer Participation and Government Support

Author

Listed:
  • Weiming Li

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Boyang Cao

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Chunyan Li

    (International Business School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Abstract

Resource bricolage, centered on breaking through resource constraints, emphasizes providing innovation momentum for new ventures by creatively reorganizing existing resources at hand. Existing studies have confirmed that resource bricolage exerts an impact on corporate innovation, yet explorations into this approach’s mechanism of action remain insufficient. Based on resource bricolage theory and organizational ambidexterity theory, this study constructs a theoretical framework of “resource bricolage–ambidextrous learning–micro-innovation”. Using 319 new ventures as samples, hierarchical regression analysis is adopted to empirically test the mediating effect of ambidextrous learning and the moderating effects of government support and customer participation. The results show that resource bricolage has a significant positive impact on micro-innovation, with ambidextrous learning playing a partial mediating role. The research conclusions indicate that under resource-constrained contexts, new ventures can activate idle resources and improve resource efficiency through resource bricolage, thereby reducing reliance on new resource inputs. Under this method, new ventures can also rely on ambidextrous learning to accumulate knowledge and capabilities, laying the foundation for the continuous improvement of micro-innovation and further leverage government support to stabilize resource supply and absorb customer participation to align with market demand. This mechanism ultimately enables the achievement of micro-innovation while enhancing its sustainability. This study enriches resource bricolage theory by unpacking the “resource–learning–innovation” mechanism and provides practical guidance for new ventures to leverage resource bricolage and external support for micro-innovation under resource constraints, which is of reference value for sustainable entrepreneurial practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiming Li & Boyang Cao & Chunyan Li, 2025. "An Exploration of the Influence Mechanism of Resource Bricolage and Ambidextrous Learning on Micro-Innovation in New Ventures: The Moderating Roles of Customer Participation and Government Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7786-:d:1737391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Bontis & Mary M. Crossan & John Hulland, 2002. "Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 437-469, June.
    2. Garud, Raghu & Karnoe, Peter, 2003. "Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 277-300, February.
    3. Qing Cao & Eric Gedajlovic & Hongping Zhang, 2009. "Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 781-796, August.
    4. Zahra, Shaker A. & Bogner, William C., 2000. "Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 135-173, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martínez-Román, Juan A. & Gamero, Javier & Tamayo, Juan A. & Delgado-González, Loreto, 2020. "Empirical analysis of organizational archetypes based on generation and adoption of knowledge and technologies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    2. Lin Song & Li Jing, 0. "Strategic orientation and performance of new ventures: empirical studies based on entrepreneurial activities in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    3. Lin Song & Li Jing, 2017. "Strategic orientation and performance of new ventures: empirical studies based on entrepreneurial activities in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 989-1012, December.
    4. Sultan H Almotiri, 2024. "Quantum-resilient software security: A fuzzy AHP-based assessment framework in the era of quantum computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    6. Lai, Kuei-Kuei & Chen, Yu-Long & Kumar, Vimal & Daim, Tugrul & Verma, Pratima & Kao, Fang-Chen & Liu, Ruirong, 2023. "Mapping technological trajectories and exploring knowledge sources: A case study of E-payment technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    7. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.
    8. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    9. Naomi Haefner & Maximilian Palmié & Petteri T. Leppänen, 2023. "With(Out) a Little Help From My Friends? Reconciling Incongruous Findings on Stakeholder Management, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 142-171, January.
    10. Zbigniew Drewniak & Rafal Drewniak & Robert Karaszewski, 2020. "The Assessment of the Features of Inter-organisational Relationships: Benefits, Duration, Repeatability and Maturity of the Relationship with the Company's Stakeholders," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 443-461.
    11. Mario Pansera & Fabien Martinez, 2017. "Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review," Post-Print hal-02887777, HAL.
    12. Harborne, Paul & Hendry, Chris, 2009. "Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3580-3595, September.
    13. Pavlos Kilintzis & Giorgos Avlogiaris & Elpida Samara & Yiannis Bakouros, 2023. "Technology Entrepreneurship: a Model for the European Case," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 879-904, June.
    14. Sanna Hilden & Kati Tikkamäki, 2013. "Reflective Practice as a Fuel for Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Anastasiia Laskovaia & Galina Shirokova & Michael H. Morris, 2017. "Erratum to: National culture, effectuation, and new venture performance: global evidence from student entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 711-715, October.
    16. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Shashi,, 2019. "Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 172-194.
    17. Witell, Lars & Gebauer, Heiko & Jaakkola, Elina & Hammedi, Wafa & Patricio, Lia & Perks, Helen, 2017. "A bricolage perspective on service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 290-298.
    18. Jan Ossenbrink & Joern Hoppmann & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2019. "Hybrid Ambidexterity: How the Environment Shapes Incumbents’ Use of Structural and Contextual Approaches," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1319-1348, November.
    19. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Li, Fei & Zhang, Nana, 2025. "Digital transformation, innovation investment and quality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7786-:d:1737391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.