Author
Listed:
- Juanjuan Li
(School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
Abstract
China’s sustained economic growth and industrialisation have led to increasingly serious problems of resource consumption and environmental pressure, making green development an inevitable choice for the country’s transformation and development. Green finance policies are becoming an increasingly important tool for increasing the use of green energy in cities. Using a dual machine learning (DML) model, this paper assesses the specific impact of green finance policies on green energy efficiency in Chinese cities, the mechanism of action, and regional disparities. The analysis is based on objective and scientific measurement of the level of green finance policies and green energy efficiency in 282 Chinese cities at prefecture level and above from 2006 to 2022. Benchmark regression results show that green finance policies significantly promote green energy efficiency in Chinese cities, passing a rigorous robustness test. Green bond policies are found to have the greatest promotional effect, whereas green support policies are found to have no significant effect. The results of the heterogeneity analysis suggest that green finance policies are more effective in promoting green energy efficiency in resource-based cities, cities with established industrial bases, and more developed cities. The results of the impact mechanism suggest that green finance policies can promote green energy efficiency by allocating the three internal urban factors of labour, capital and technology. The results of the analysis of regional disparities demonstrate that green finance policies effectively reduce disparities in urban green energy efficiency at the national level, between the north and south, and between coastal and inland regions. However, they also widen the disparities between central and peripheral cities within each province, hindering balanced regional development. This paper makes relevant policy recommendations based on this.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7733-:d:1735781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.