IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7650-d1731849.html

Synergistic Innovation Pathways in Aviation Complex Product Ecosystems: Enabling Sustainability Through Resource Efficiency and Systemic Collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Renyong Hou

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xiaorui Song

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qing Yan

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xueying Zhang

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jiaxuan Deng

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Achieving sustainable development in the aviation industry increasingly relies on the synergistic operation of complex product innovation ecosystems. These ecosystems not only drive technological breakthroughs, but also serve as crucial enablers of resource efficiency, ecological resilience, and long-term industrial competitiveness. This study explores how specific configurations of synergistic factors within innovation ecosystems support sustainable innovation outcomes in the aviation sector. Drawing on the innovation ecosystem theory and principles of sustainable development, we employed fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine 15 representative aviation equipment R&D cases, including AVIC Tongfei and AVIC Xifei. The analysis centers on five key dimensions: core enterprise leadership, value chain collaboration, cross-organizational innovation, technology–market feedback loops, and institutional policy support. These dimensions interact to shape multiple synergy pathways that facilitate sustainable transformation. The results reveal that no single factor alone is sufficient to ensure high innovation sustainability. Instead, three distinct synergy configurations emerge: (1) core enterprise-led model, which reduces resource redundancy through optimized value chain governance; (2) the industry chain collaboration model, which enhances environmental performance via modular design and lifecycle management; and (3) cross-organization innovation collaboration model, which improves material reuse and infrastructure sharing through collaborative mechanisms. Together, these pathways form a reinforcing cycle of innovation–efficiency–sustainability, offering a practical framework for aligning technological advancement with ecological goals. This study deepens the understanding of how innovation ecosystem mechanisms contribute to sustainable development, particularly in high-integration industries. It offers actionable insights into achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through collaborative innovation and systemic resource optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Renyong Hou & Xiaorui Song & Qing Yan & Xueying Zhang & Jiaxuan Deng, 2025. "Synergistic Innovation Pathways in Aviation Complex Product Ecosystems: Enabling Sustainability Through Resource Efficiency and Systemic Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7650-:d:1731849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobday, Mike, 1998. "Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 689-710, February.
    2. James Moody & Mark Dodgson, 2006. "Managing Complex Collaborative Projects: Lessons from the Development of a New Satellite," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 568-588, September.
    3. Luo, Jianxi, 2018. "Architecture and evolvability of innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 132-144.
    4. Michael L. Katz & Carl Shapiro, 1994. "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 93-115, Spring.
    5. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, He & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of platform research: Developing the research agenda for platforms, the associated technologies and social impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Thorsten Koch & Josef Windsperger, 2017. "Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Jing Zeng & Yunlu Yang & Soo Hee Lee, 2023. "Resource Orchestration and Scaling‐up of Platform‐Based Entrepreneurial Firms: The Logic of Dialectic Tuning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 605-638, May.
    4. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Viktora-Jones, Magdalena & Parente, Ronaldo & Drori, Netanel & Zhao, Yue, 2024. "Firm performance drivers within a dynamic emerging market ecosystem," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    6. Lütjen, Heiner & Schultz, Carsten & Tietze, Frank & Urmetzer, Florian, 2019. "Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 506-519.
    7. Walrave, Bob & Talmar, Madis & Podoynitsyna, Ksenia S. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2018. "A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 103-113.
    8. Shen, Rui & Guo, Hai & Ma, Hongjia, 2023. "How do entrepreneurs' cross-cultural experiences contribute to entrepreneurial ecosystem performance?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    9. Roy, Sanjit K. & Tehrani, Ali N. & Pandit, Ameet & Apostolidis, Chrysostomos & Ray, Subhasis, 2025. "AI-capable relationship marketing: Shaping the future of customer relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Lutz, Salla & Ellegaard, Chris, 2015. "The mobilization of supplier resources for complex projects: A case study of routines in the offshore wind turbine industry," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 107-116.
    11. Robertson, Jeandri & Caruana, Albert & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2023. "Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    12. Rong, Ke & Ren, Qun & Shi, Xianwei, 2018. "The determinants of network effects: Evidence from online games business ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 45-60.
    13. Ansari, Shahzad (Shaz) & Krop, Pieter, 2012. "Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1357-1374.
    14. Alar Kolk & Mait Rungi, 2012. "Total Exploitation Orientation in Capability Development: The Cross-case of Google, Ericsson, Microsoft and Nokia," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 4(2).
    15. Yuan, Chun & Xue, Doudou & He, Xin, 2021. "A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Constance E. Helfat & Aseem Kaul & David J. Ketchen & Jay B. Barney & Olivier Chatain & Harbir Singh, 2023. "Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1357-1390, June.
    17. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Salerno, Mario Sergio & Ikenami, Rodrigo Kazuo, 2018. "Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-48.
    18. Stornelli, Aldo & Simms, Christopher & Reim, Wiebke & Ozcan, Sercan, 2024. "Exploring the dynamic capabilities of technology provider ecosystems: A study of smart manufacturing projects," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Helfat, Constance E. & Raubitschek, Ruth S., 2018. "Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1391-1399.
    20. Liu, Zhiyang & Liu, Jianyi & Zhao, Chenfang & Qiu, Zhenyu, 2025. "Business model innovation in the age of metaverse," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7650-:d:1731849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.