Author
Listed:
- Xiaoyu Zhao
(College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)
- Erfu Dai
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
- Kangning Kong
(Shandong Provincial Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration Center, Jinan 250010, China)
- Yuan Tian
(Shandong Provincial Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration Center, Jinan 250010, China)
- Yong Yang
(Shandong Provincial Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration Center, Jinan 250010, China)
- Zhuo Li
(College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)
- Jiachen Liu
(College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)
- Baolei Zhang
(College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)
- Le Yin
(College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)
Abstract
Ecological zoning is a key approach to promoting regional ecological protection and sustainable development. At present, landscape ecological risk (LER), driven by both natural and anthropogenic factors, continues to intensify, thereby disrupting ecosystem functions and weakening their service capacity. Although ecosystem services (ESs) and LER have been increasingly integrated into ecological management and policy-making in recent years, the interactive relationship between them remains insufficiently explored, particularly in the context of ecological zoning based on their coupled characteristics. Therefore, this study focuses on the Hengduan Mountain region from 2000 to 2020, analyzing the relationship between ES trade-offs and LER, constructing ecological zones, and proposing targeted management strategies. The results show that: (1) ESs in the region are primarily characterized by concave trade-offs, with decreasing trade-off intensity over time. The overall LER level has decreased, exhibiting a spatial pattern of higher risk in the south and lower risk in the north. (2) Bivariate spatial autocorrelation analysis reveals that LER is positively correlated with the trade-offs of carbon storage and soil conservation, shifts from a negative to a positive correlation with carbon storage and water yield, and shifts from a positive to a negative correlation with soil conservation and water yield. (3) Based on overlay zoning, the region is divided into protection, warning, and restoration zones, each with corresponding management measures. This study takes ecological zoning as a starting point to deeply analyze the relationship between ES trade-offs and LER, providing a scientific basis for sustainable development of mountain ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoyu Zhao & Erfu Dai & Kangning Kong & Yuan Tian & Yong Yang & Zhuo Li & Jiachen Liu & Baolei Zhang & Le Yin, 2025.
"Ecological Zoning in Mountainous Areas Based on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Landscape Ecological Risk: A Case Study of the Hengduan Mountain Region,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-31, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7630-:d:1731342
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7630-:d:1731342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.