IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7624-d1731248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Registration System Reform Promote Corporate Sustainability? Evidence from China’s ESG Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Han

    (School of Business, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Runchang Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Yao Xu

    (School of Business, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Yaoyao Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

Abstract

The registration system reform (RSR) represents a landmark innovation in China’s IPO system, aiming to promote a more transparent, competitive, and sustainable market. Exploiting the staggered implementation of RSR as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a difference-in-differences (DID) model using a sample of Chinese A-share IPO firms from 2016 to 2022 to investigate its impact on corporate sustainability, as proxied by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Our findings indicate that RSR significantly enhances corporate ESG performance, especially the governance (G) performance. Mechanism analysis suggests that market competition, investor rationality, and sponsor reputation are potential channels through which the reform facilitates corporate sustainability. Furthermore, the above relationship is more pronounced in regions with a higher degree of marketization, among non-state-owned enterprises, and those with weaker profitability. Moreover, the reform not only exhibits long-term effects but also demonstrates positive spillover effects on peer firms originally listed under the approval-based system. Overall, our study extends the understanding of how capital market institutional reforms promote corporate sustainability in the era of the digital economy and provides valuable insights for regulators to standardize and enhance RSR, thereby establishing a resilient and sustainable financial ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Han & Runchang Liu & Yao Xu & Yaoyao Liu, 2025. "Can Registration System Reform Promote Corporate Sustainability? Evidence from China’s ESG Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7624-:d:1731248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zabihollah Rezaee & Ling Tuo, 2019. "Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 763-786, March.
    2. Wang, Baoyi & Khan, Inayat & Ge, Chenlu & Naz, Huma, 2024. "Digital transformation of enterprises promotes green technology innovation – The regulated mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Wang, AnChao & Saqib, Abdul, 2025. "How entrepreneurship drives ESG performance: The roles of data assetization and financing constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    6. Xiaosan Zhang & Qingquan Jiang & Javier Cifuentes‐Faura & Xiaojie Hu & Yuyan Li, 2025. "Do tax incentives matter in promoting corporate ESG performance toward sustainable development?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 57-69, January.
    7. Zhukun Lou & Mingran Li & Yuan George Shan & Ailin Ye, 2024. "Does corporate digitalisation moderate real earnings management?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 4157-4196, December.
    8. Saketh Aleti & Tim Bollerslev, 2025. "News and Asset Pricing: A High-Frequency Anatomy of the SDF," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 712-759.
    9. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Xue, Yufei & He, Sheng, 2024. "Judicial reforms and corporate governance: The contribution of circuit courts to ESG performance improvement," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Shuxian He & Xin Sheng, 2025. "Does bank digitalisation reduce corporate agency costs? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(2), pages 1987-2012, June.
    12. Li, Qinyang & He, Liping & Gou, Xiao & Ren, Yao, 2024. "The registration-based IPO reform and the cost of equity capital: evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    13. Zhang, Dongyang & Lucey, Brian M., 2022. "Sustainable behaviors and firm performance: The role of financial constraints’ alleviation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 220-233.
    14. Jiang, Cuixia & Xu, Jialin & Xu, Qifa & Fu, Weizhong, 2024. "Can we rest easy under the registration-based IPO reform? Evidence from the Chinese growth enterprise market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 990-1006.
    15. Jenna J. Burke, 2022. "Do Boards Take Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues Seriously? Evidence from Media Coverage and CEO Dismissals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 647-671, April.
    16. Michael L. Barnett & Robert M. Salomon, 2012. "Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1304-1320, November.
    17. Caroline Flammer, 2015. "Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(10), pages 1469-1485, October.
    18. Guangyou Zhou & Lian Liu & Sumei Luo, 2022. "Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3371-3387, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Shengnan & Liu, Chan & Wang, Ze & Ye, Zihan & Sun, Xialing & Tan, Zhanglu, 2024. "The impact of the carbon reduction policy effectiveness on energy companies' ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    2. Renhong Wu & Jinbao Li & Yunhai Dai & Xiangdong Shen & Md. Alamgir Hossain, 2024. "Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance on Innovation in Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Heying Liu & Chan Lyu, 2022. "Can ESG Ratings Stimulate Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Xiaoyu Cui & Baolei Qi & Muhammad Jameel Hussain, 2024. "Vendor sustainability performance and corporate customers' supplier selection," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2910-2928, July.
    5. Wang, Zi & Zheng, Dechang, 2025. "Media heterogeneity and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Chen, Yongtai & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Narayan, Seema & Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh, 2024. "Does climate risk impact firms' ESG performance? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 683-695.
    7. Zhu, Bo & Wang, Yansen, 2024. "Does social trust affect firms' ESG performance?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Wei Jiang & Xin Wang & Liping Liang & Mingming Leng & Xin Fang, 2025. "ESG Ratings as a Strategic Imperative: Unraveling Their Influence on Corporate Financial Performance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9313-9337, June.
    10. Jiang, Liqun & Chang, Zhongyuan & Yao, Wenxin & Huang, Leyi & Zhou, Shumei, 2024. "Transcend local for global: ESG as a legitimacy signal in the global expansion of emerging multinational enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    11. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Chao Wang & Jiapeng Li & Yang Yi & Shuwang Yang, 2024. "Crowding in or crowding out? Executive environmental attention and ESG performance of mining listed companies," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(4), pages 897-913, December.
    13. Chen Xu & Yu He, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Technology Innovation: A Moderating Effect Based on Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Cheng, Yiming & Zeng, Bo & Lin, Weixing, 2024. "Heterogenous effects of inclusive digital economy and resource distribution mismatch on corporate ESG performance in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    16. Xu, Siyun & Bai, Xiaodong & Chen, Xia, 2025. "Corporate environmental, social, and governance performance, investor attention, and corporate development capability—An empirical examination based on moderating and threshold effects," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Hao, Xiaoli & Sun, Qingyu & Li, Ke & Li, Peilun & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "Does environmental decentralisation improve ESG performance? Evidence from listed companies in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2021. "Family ownership and stockholder reactions to environmental performance disclosure: A test of secondary agency relationships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2091-2107, May.
    19. Fiorillo, Paolo & Santilli, Gianluca, 2024. "The influence of shareholder ESG performance on corporate sustainability: Exploring the role of ownership structure," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    20. Fangjun Wang & Xinmiao Zhou & Tian Gan, 2024. "Can green funds improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance? Evidence from Chinese-listed companies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-32, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7624-:d:1731248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.