IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7612-d1731005.html

Gas Extraction and Earthquakes in the Netherlands: Drawing Lessons from the Response to Ongoing Social Conflict and Tensions

Author

Listed:
  • Nienke Busscher

    (Department of Social Psychology, Kennisplatform Leefbaar en Kansrijk Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Ena Vojvodić

    (Department of Social Psychology, Kennisplatform Leefbaar en Kansrijk Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Since the onset of gas extraction in Groningen province, the Netherlands, more than 1700 earthquakes have taken place. This has resulted in damage to properties and safety issues for almost 28,000 buildings. As a result, an extensive reinforcement and damage repair operation started, due to which, many residents were temporarily relocated. Although the need for compensation and restoration was recognized from 2012, recent years are characterized by unclear and shifting responsibilities, bureaucratic complexities, and evolving compensation standards, leading to disparity and a further escalation of social impacts. This paper examines developments in the case from 2015 onwards, when the last overview article on this case was published. We observe that even after a decade of compensation efforts, many residents experience loss of trust in the government and endure chronic stress that impacts their well-being, family dynamics, and overall quality of life. We analyze the government-led mitigation and compensation system that in essence fails to address the grievances of local people. Even after broad recognition of the flawed system, the parliament did not fundamentally change it. In nine lessons, we underscore the global imperative for robust social impact assessments, ongoing social monitoring, and well-coordinated compensation frameworks. This is not only crucial to address socio-ecological distress, but also to build more accountable and sustainable institutional responses to future extraction endeavors.

Suggested Citation

  • Nienke Busscher & Ena Vojvodić, 2025. "Gas Extraction and Earthquakes in the Netherlands: Drawing Lessons from the Response to Ongoing Social Conflict and Tensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7612-:d:1731005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elianne A. Zijlstra & Mijntje D. C. ten Brummelaar & Mileen S. Cuijpers & Wendy J. Post & Ingrid D. C. van Balkom & Hamed Seddighi, 2022. "A Safe Home? A Qualitative Study into the Experiences of Adolescents Growing Up in the Dutch Area Impacted by Earthquakes Induced by Gas Extraction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Frank Vanclay & Philippe Hanna, 2019. "Conceptualizing Company Response to Community Protest: Principles to Achieve a Social License to Operate," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blesia, Jhon Urasti & Dixon, Keith & Lord, Beverley Rae, 2023. "Indigenous experiences and perspectives on a mining corporation's community relations and development activities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Anika Trebbin, 2021. "Land Grabbing and Jatropha in India: An Analysis of ‘Hyped’ Discourse on the Subject," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Alexandra Köves & Tamás Veress & Judit Gáspár & Réka Matolay, 2021. "Conceptualizing Cuvée Organizations: Characteristics Leading towards Sustainable Decision-Making Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Brereton, David & Flynn, Sharon & Kemp, Deanna, 2024. "An essay on mining and the moral obligation not to harm others," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Tom Ogwang & Frank Vanclay, 2019. "Social Impacts of Land Acquisition for Oil and Gas Development in Uganda," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Alberto Diantini & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Tim Edwards Powers & Daniele Codato & Giuseppe Della Fera & Marco Heredia-R & Francesco Facchinelli & Edoardo Crescini & Massimo De Marchi, 2020. "Is this a Real Choice? Critical Exploration of the Social License to Operate in the Oil Extraction Context of the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Stuart, Alice & Bond, Alan & Franco, Aldina M.A. & Baker, Julia & Gerrard, Chris & Danino, Vittoria & Jones, Kylie, 2023. "Conceptualising social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    8. Roy, Vivek & Silvestre, Bruno S. & Singh, Shubham, 2020. "Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: Manufacturer's perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Hui Zhang & Shangxian Shen & Linzi Zheng & La Zhai, 2025. "Unpacking the “cultural costs” of social license to operate on environmental governance among ethnic minorities in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Stephany Iriana Pasaribu & Frank Vanclay, 2021. "Children’s Rights in the Indonesian Oil Palm Industry: Improving Company Respect for the Rights of the Child," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Yanina Kowszyk & Rajiv Maher & Frank Vanclay & Mariana Walter, 2026. "Moral management in the extractive industries during turbulent times: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Woźniak, Justyna, 2022. "Corporate vs. Corporate foundation as a support tool in the area of social responsibility strategy – Polish mining case," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Fitzgerald, Louise & Maonaigh, Conchúr Ó, 2026. "From energy firms to communities: Beyond market-centric approaches for just policy impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Pablo Aznar-Crespo & Antonio Aledo & Joaquín Melgarejo-Moreno & Arturo Vallejos-Romero, 2021. "Adapting Social Impact Assessment to Flood Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Amoako, Kwame Oduro & Lord, Beverley R. & Dixon, Keith, 2021. "Narrative accounting for mining in Ghana: An old defence against a new threat?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Karina Castro-Arce & Frank Vanclay, 2020. "Community-Led Green Land Acquisition: Social Innovative Initiatives for Forest Protection and Regional Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Woźniak, Justyna & Jurczyk, Weronika, 2022. "SLO in CSR perspective - A comparative case study from Poland (2018–2020)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Ayele, Seife & Shen, Wei & Mulugetta, Yacob & Worako, Tadesse Kuma, 2024. "Governance of renewable energy procurement via private suppliers: The Ethiopian experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Kerstin Schopp, 2020. "Analyzing Coping Strategies and Adaptation after Resettlement—Case Study of Ekondo Kondo, Cameroon and Ekondo Kondo Model of Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Tai Abdulrahman Alshammari & Khalid Mhasan Alshammary & Fahad Maiyah Alshammari, 2022. "Green Product and Process Innovation, Corporate Environmental Ethics and Competitive Advantages among Manufacturing Firms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(2), pages 51-61.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7612-:d:1731005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.