IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7610-d1730962.html

Assessment of Soil Quality in Peruvian Andean Smallholdings: A Comparative Study of PCA and Expert Opinion Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Tomás Samaniego

    (Estación Experimental Agraria Donoso, Dirección de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Lima 15200, Peru)

  • Beatriz Sales

    (Estación Experimental Agraria Donoso, Dirección de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Lima 15200, Peru)

  • Richard Solórzano

    (Centro Experimental La Molina, Dirección de Servicios Estratégicos Agrarios, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Lima 15024, Peru
    Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Científica del Sur (UCSUR), Lima 15024, Peru)

Abstract

Soil degradation poses a significant threat to the sustainability of agroecosystems, particularly in mountainous regions where environmental conditions are highly variable and management practices are often suboptimal. In this context, soil quality assessment emerges as a key tool for guiding sustainable land use and informing decision-making processes. This study aimed to develop and spatially evaluate a Soil Quality Index (SQI) tailored to the northeast sector of Jangas district, Ancash, Peru. A total of 24 soil indicators were initially considered and reduced using Spearman’s correlations to avoid multicollinearity. Depending on the weighting strategy applied, the final SQI configurations incorporated between 14 and 15 indicators. Two weighting strategies—Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Expert Opinion (EO)—were combined with linear and non-linear (sigmoidal) scoring functions, resulting in four distinct SQI configurations. The spatial performance of each index was tested using Geographically Weighted Regression Kriging (GWRK), incorporating covariates like NDMI, elevation, slope, and aspect. The SQI constructed using PCA combined with non-linear scoring achieved the highest performance, effectively minimizing skewness and while achieving the highest predictive accuracy under GWRK. By contrast, although the EO-based index with linear scoring demonstrated similar statistical robustness, it failed to achieve comparable effectiveness in terms of spatial predictive accuracy. The SQIs generated offer a practical framework for local institutions to identify and prioritize areas requiring intervention. Through the interpretation of complex soil data into accessible, spatially explicit maps, these indices facilitate the targeted application of inputs—such as organic amendments in low-SQI zones—and support the implementation of improved management practices, including crop rotation and soil conservation, without necessitating advanced technical expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomás Samaniego & Beatriz Sales & Richard Solórzano, 2025. "Assessment of Soil Quality in Peruvian Andean Smallholdings: A Comparative Study of PCA and Expert Opinion Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7610-:d:1730962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dongwei Liu & Shanlong Li & Weixing Zhu & Yongyang Wang & Shasha Zhang & Yunting Fang, 2023. "Storage and Stability of Soil Organic Carbon in Two Temperate Forests in Northeastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Zhongmin Dai & Xu Guo & Jiahui Lin & Xiu Wang & Dan He & Rujiong Zeng & Jun Meng & Jipeng Luo & Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo & Eduardo Moreno-Jiménez & Philip C. Brookes & Jianming Xu, 2023. "Metallic micronutrients are associated with the structure and function of the soil microbiome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Yumin Yuan & Kai Yang & Lirong Cheng & Yijuan Bai & Yingying Wang & Ying Hou & Aizhong Ding, 2022. "Effect of Normalization Methods on Accuracy of Estimating Low- and High-Molecular Weight PAHs Distribution in the Soils of a Coking Plant," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Eleftherios Evangelou & Christina Giourga, 2024. "Identification of Soil Quality Factors and Indicators in Mediterranean Agro-Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Aweke M. Gelaw & B. R. Singh & R. Lal, 2015. "Soil Quality Indices for Evaluating Smallholder Agricultural Land Uses in Northern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Rajath Ellur & Ananthakumar Maddur Ankappa & Subramanian Dharumarajan & Thimmegowda Puttavenkategowda & Thimmegowda Matadadoddi Nanjundegowda & Prakash Salekoppal Sannegowda & Arun Pratap Mishra & Boj, 2024. "Soil Quality Assessment and Its Spatial Variability in an Intensively Cultivated Area in India," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Muhammad Mohiuddin & Muhammad Irshad & Sadaf Sher & Faisal Hayat & Ammar Ashraf & Salman Masood & Sumera Bibi & Jawad Ali & Muhammad Waseem, 2022. "Relationship of Selected Soil Properties with the Micronutrients in Salt-Affected Soils," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saeed Kamranfar & Farid Damirchi & Mitra Pourvaziri & Pardayev Abdunabi Xalikovich & Samira Mahmoudkelayeh & Reza Moezzi & Amir Vadiee, 2023. "A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling Analysis of the Primary Barriers to Sustainable Construction in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Douglas L. Karlen & Charles W. Rice, 2015. "Soil Degradation: Will Humankind Ever Learn?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Lu Gong & Guixiang He & Weiguo Liu, 2016. "Long-Term Cropping Effects on Agricultural Sustainability in Alar Oasis of Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Sukamal Sarkar & Anannya Dhar & Saikat Dey & Sujan Kr. Chatterjee & Shibasis Mukherjee & Argha Chakraborty & Gautam Chatterjee & Natesan Ravisankar & Mohammed Mainuddin, 2024. "Natural and Organic Input-Based Integrated Nutrient-Management Practices Enhance the Productivity and Soil Quality Index of Rice–Mustard–Green Gram Cropping System," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Emanoel Gomes de Moura & Christoph Gehring & Heder Braun & Altamiro De Souza Lima Ferraz Junior & Fabricio De Oliveira Reis & Alana Das Chagas Ferreira Aguiar, 2016. "Improving Farming Practices for Sustainable Soil Use in the Humid Tropics and Rainforest Ecosystem Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Fedor Lisetskii & Arseniy Poletaev & Evgenia Zelenskaya, 2025. "Soil Indicators of Terroir and Their Importance for Adaptive and Sustainable Viticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-34, April.
    7. Endale Bekele & Girma Abera & Habtamu Temesgen, 2025. "Effects of agroforestry land use on soil physicochemical properties and soil quality in Gilgel Gibe I catchment, Southwestern Ethiopia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 5313-5336, February.
    8. Shazia Nawaz & Muhammad Irshad & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Muhammad Ashraf & Sumera Bibi & Nadeem Shaukat & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Anne Wai Man Ng, 2022. "Lead Extraction Methods in Roadside Soils and Its Relationship with Soil Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7610-:d:1730962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.