IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7581-d1730350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Organizational Health: Dyadic Patterns of Leaders’ StaffCare and Employees’ SelfCare in Hybrid Work

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Bruhn

    (Department of Work, Organizational, and Business Psychology, Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forces, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Annika Krick

    (Department of Work, Organizational, and Business Psychology, Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forces, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Jörg Felfe

    (Department of Work, Organizational, and Business Psychology, Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forces, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

The Special Issue on Health, Well-Being and Sustainability invites research that integrates behavioral, cultural, and systemic approaches to fostering sustainable lifestyles within work environments. This study focuses on the role of leadership in promoting employee health and healthy lifestyles, which are central dimensions of the validated Health-oriented Leadership framework. Although previous research has assumed that high levels of leader StaffCare lead to high levels of employee SelfCare and consequently to better health outcomes, inconsistent dyadic patterns have rarely been examined. In this study, we investigate dyadic relationship patterns between leaders’ StaffCare and employees’ SelfCare jointly creating a sustainable workplace health system in hybrid contexts. Using Latent Profile Analysis on a sample of N = 1104, we identify consistent and inconsistent patterns, their health and motivational outcomes after three months, as well as potential antecedents in terms of working conditions for profile membership. The consistent dyads showed expected results: high StaffCare and high SelfCare led to high health and motivation outcomes, while low StaffCare and low SelfCare resulted in the lowest outcomes. New findings emerged in inconsistent dyads. In the low leaders’ StaffCare and high employees’ SelfCare dyad ( Bystanders & Health Proactives ), leaders recognized risks but did not actively promote health measures. However, proactive employees who engage in SelfCare behaviorally compensate for insufficient leader support but at a motivational cost. In contrast, the high leaders’ StaffCare and low employees’ SelfCare dyad ( Health Sacrificers ) included leaders who supported employees’ health but neglected their own, resulting in lower health but higher motivation among employees. Job demands and resources partly predicted group membership and can offer practical implications for building work environments that foster employees’ well-being and health. The findings offer insights into inconsistent leadership behaviors and provide guidance for enhancing employee well-being, particularly in hybrid work environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Bruhn & Annika Krick & Jörg Felfe, 2025. "Fostering Organizational Health: Dyadic Patterns of Leaders’ StaffCare and Employees’ SelfCare in Hybrid Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7581-:d:1730350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7581/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7581/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sofie Bjärntoft & David M. Hallman & Svend Erik Mathiassen & Johan Larsson & Helena Jahncke, 2020. "Occupational and Individual Determinants of Work-life Balance among Office Workers with Flexible Work Arrangements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Klebe, Laura & Felfe, Jörg & Klug, Katharina, 2022. "Mission impossible? Effects of crisis, leader and follower strain on health-oriented leadership," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 384-392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Sandoval-Reyes & Sandra Idrovo-Carlier & Edison Jair Duque-Oliva, 2021. "Remote Work, Work Stress, and Work–Life during Pandemic Times: A Latin America Situation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Eva L. Bergsten & Katarina Wijk & David M. Hallman, 2021. "Relocation to Activity-Based Workplaces (ABW)—Importance of the Implementation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Johanna Edvinsson & Svend Erik Mathiassen & Sofie Bjärntoft & Helena Jahncke & Terry Hartig & David M. Hallman, 2022. "A Work Time Control Tradeoff in Flexible Work: Competitive Pathways to Need for Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Kapo Wong & Alan H. S. Chan & Pei-Lee Teh, 2020. "How Is Work–Life Balance Arrangement Associated with Organisational Performance? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Sarah Pischel & Jörg Felfe & Laura Klebe, 2022. "“Should I Further Engage in Staff Care?”: Employees’ Disclosure, Leaders’ Skills and Goal Conflict as Antecedents of Health-Oriented Leadership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Dimitrije Gašić & Nemanja Berber & Agneš Slavić & Maja Strugar Jelača & Slobodan Marić & Radmila Bjekić & Marko Aleksić, 2024. "The Key Role of Employee Commitment in the Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements and Employee Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Timo Kortsch & Ricarda Rehwaldt & Manon E. Schwake & Chantal Licari, 2022. "Does Remote Work Make People Happy? Effects of Flexibilization of Work Location and Working Hours on Happiness at Work and Affective Commitment in the German Banking Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Morf, Manuela & Bakker, Arnold B., 2024. "Ups and downs in transformational leadership: A weekly diary study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 200-210.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7581-:d:1730350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.