IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7552-d1729404.html

Teachers’ Beliefs About Education for Sustainable Development: Challenges and Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Birol Bulut

    (Social Studies Education Department, Faculty of Education, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Türkiye)

  • Irem Elci Oksuzoglu

    (Social Studies Education Department, Faculty of Education, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Türkiye)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine teachers’ belief levels regarding education for sustainable development (ESD), to identify the factors behind these beliefs, and to reveal their suggestions for improving the quality of ESD. The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Data were collected from 409 teachers working at primary and secondary schools in Türkiye through the “Beliefs About Education for Sustainable Development Scale” and semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analyzed using an independent samples t -test, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Pearson product-moment correlation, and the qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The results indicated that the participants’ beliefs in ESD practices were high, but these beliefs were negatively affected by challenges due to SD goals, policymakers, students, and parents. In addition, the participants made recommendations for improving the quality of ESD to policymakers, the Turkish Council of Higher Education, the Ministry of National Education, and their colleagues. The findings of the study present significant implications for policymakers and educators for more effective implementation of ESD in the education system.

Suggested Citation

  • Birol Bulut & Irem Elci Oksuzoglu, 2025. "Teachers’ Beliefs About Education for Sustainable Development: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7552-:d:1729404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woonsun Kang, 2019. "Perceived Barriers to Implementing Education for Sustainable Development among Korean Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Deidre Bauer & Julia Arnold & Kerstin Kremer, 2018. "Consumption-Intention Formation in Education for Sustainable Development: An Adapted Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Thomas Dahl, 2019. "Prepared to Teach for Sustainable Development? Student Teachers’ Beliefs in Their Ability to Teach for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, April.
    6. Leire Agirreazkuenaga, 2019. "Embedding Sustainable Development Goals in Education. Teachers’ Perspective about Education for Sustainability in the Basque Autonomous Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Jessica Müller & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller & Prateek Kalia & Khalid Mehmood, 2021. "Predictive Sustainability Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior Incorporating Ecological Conscience and Moral Obligation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Tuba Stouthart & Dury Bayram & Jan van der Veen, 2023. "Capturing Pedagogical Design Capacity of STEM Teacher Candidates: Education for Sustainable Development through Socioscientific Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Hongyun Si & Jian-gang Shi & Daizhong Tang & Shiping Wen & Wei Miao & Kaifeng Duan, 2019. "Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Environmental Science: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Tianning Zhang & Shamsheer ul Haq & Xiaodi Xu & Muhammad Nadeem, 2024. "Greening ambitions: exploring factors influencing university students' intentions for sustainable entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2863-2899, December.
    11. Anna Shutaleva & Zhanna Nikonova & Irina Savchenko & Nikita Martyushev, 2020. "Environmental Education for Sustainable Development in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Maryam A. Al-Hail & Luluwah Al-Fagih & Muammer Koç, 2021. "Partnering for Sustainability: Parent-Teacher-School (PTS) Interactions in the Qatar Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Kifah Imara & Fahriye Altinay, 2021. "Integrating Education for Sustainable Development Competencies in Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Dana Nițu-Antonie & Emőke-Szidónia Feder & Vladimir Nițu-Antonie & Róbert-Károly György, 2023. "Predicting Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions among Romanian Students: A Mediated and Moderated Application of the Entrepreneurial Event Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Guido Martinolli & Marco de Angelis & Núria Tordera & Luca Pietrantoni, 2021. "The Organizational Climate for Sustainable Commuting: An Italian Validation Study in the Academic Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Shankar T. Naskar & Jose Maria Merigo Lindahl, 2026. "Forty years of the theory of planned behavior: a bibliometric analysis (1985–2024)," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 573-632, February.
    4. Liu, Diyi & Qi, Suntong & Xu, Tiantong, 2023. "In the post-subsidy era: How to encourage mere consumers to become prosumers when subsidy reduced?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    6. Jessica Müller-Pérez & Viridiana Sarahí Garza-Muñiz & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Jorge Alberto Esponda-Pérez & Rina Álvarez-Becerra, 2022. "The Future of Tamaulipas MSMEs after COVID-19: Intention to Adopt Inbound Marketing Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Ilknur Ayar & Ahmet Gürbüz, 2021. "Sustainable Consumption Intentions of Consumers in Turkey: A Research Within the Theory of Planned Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    8. Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Guido Salazar-Sepulveda & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Intention: A Gender Study in Business and Economics Students from Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Kuckertz, Andreas & Wagner, Marcus, 2010. "The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions -- Investigating the role of business experience," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 524-539, September.
    10. Dijk, Marc & de Haes, Jan & Montalvo, Carlos, 2013. "Park-and-Ride motivations and air quality norms in Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 149-160.
    11. Hye Yeon Park & Carlos V. Licon & Ole Russell Sleipness, 2022. "Teaching Sustainability in Planning and Design Education: A Systematic Review of Pedagogical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Jorge Arenas-Gaitán & Begoña Peral-Peral & Jesús Reina-Arroyo, 2020. "Local Fresh Food Products and Plant-Based Diets: An Analysis of the Relation Between Them," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Florence A. Undiyaundeye & Julius. A. Basake, 2017. "Mentoring and Career Development of Academics in Colleges of Education in Cross River State Nigeria," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, ejms_v2_i.
    14. Husted, Bryan W. & Russo, Michael V. & Meza, Carlos E. Basurto & Tilleman, Suzanne G., 2014. "An exploratory study of environmental attitudes and the willingness to pay for environmental certification in Mexico," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 891-899.
    15. Hannus, Veronika & Sauer, Johannes, 2021. "It is not only about money —– German farmers' preferences regarding voluntary standards for farm sustainability management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Lorraine Uhlaner & Marta Berent-Braun & Ronald Jeurissen & Gerrit Wit, 2012. "Beyond Size: Predicting Engagement in Environmental Management Practices of Dutch SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 411-429, September.
    17. Othmane Aride & Maria-del-Mar Pàmies-Pallisé, 2019. "From Values to Behavior: Proposition of an Integrating Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Bowen Qin & Ge Song, 2022. "Internal Motivations, External Contexts, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior in China—Based on the TPB-ABC Integration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Zhuling Liu & Janet Z. Yang & Susan S. Clark & Michael A. Shelly, 2022. "Recycling as a planned behavior: the moderating role of perceived behavioral control," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11011-11026, September.
    20. Adekunle Oke, 2015. "Workplace Waste Recycling Behaviour: A Meta-Analytical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7552-:d:1729404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.