IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7485-d1727529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Green View Perception in Non-Street Areas by Combining Baidu Street View and Sentinel-2 Images

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyan Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100036, China
    SpaceTellan Aerospace Spatiotemporal Information Technology (Chongqing) Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401135, China)

  • Xianghong Che

    (Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100036, China)

  • Xinru Yang

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

Abstract

Urban greening distribution critically impacts residents’ quality of life and environmental sustainability. While the Green View Index (GVI), derived from street view imagery, is widely adopted for urban green space assessment, its limitation lies in the inability to capture non-street-area vegetation. Remote sensing imagery, conversely, provides full-coverage urban vegetation data. This study focuses on Beijing’s Third Ring Road area, employing DeepLabv3+ to calculate a street-view-based GVI as a predictor. Correlations between the GVI and Sentinel-2 spectral bands, along with two vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC), were analyzed under varying buffer radius. Regression and classification models were subsequently developed for GVI prediction. The optimal classifier was then applied to estimate green perception levels in non-street zones. The results demonstrated that (1) at a 25 m buffer radius, the near-infrared band, NDVI, and FVC exhibited the highest correlations with the GVI, reaching 0.553, 0.75, and 0.752, respectively. (2) Among the five machine learning regression models evaluated, the random forest algorithm demonstrated superior performance in GVI estimation, achieving a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.787, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.063 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.045. (3) When evaluating categorical perception levels of urban greenery, the Extremely Randomized Trees classifier (Extra Trees) demonstrated superior performance in green vision perception level estimation, achieving an accuracy (ACC) score of 0.652. (4) The green perception level in non-road areas within Beijing’s Third Ring Road is 56.8%, which is considered relatively poor. Moreover, the green perception level within the Second Ring Road is even lower than that in the area between the Second and Third Ring roads. This study is expected to provide valuable insights and references for the adjustment and optimization of green perception distribution in Beijing, thereby supporting more informed urban planning and the development of sustainable, human-centered green spaces across the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyan Wang & Xianghong Che & Xinru Yang, 2025. "Investigating Green View Perception in Non-Street Areas by Combining Baidu Street View and Sentinel-2 Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7485-:d:1727529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7485/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7485/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7485-:d:1727529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.