IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7478-d1727429.html

Evaluation of Opportunity Costs in Cocoa Production in Three Ecological Zones in Côte d’Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • N’Golo Konaté

    (UFR Environment, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, Daloa P.O. Box 150, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Auguste K. Kouakou

    (UFR Economic Sciences and Management, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, Daloa P.O. Box 150, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Yaya Ouattara

    (UFR Economic Sciences and Management, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, Daloa P.O. Box 150, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Patrick Jagoret

    (CIRAD, UMR ABSys, 34398 Montpellier, France
    ESA/INP-HB, Yamoussoukro 1093, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Yao S. S. Barima

    (UFR Environment, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, Daloa P.O. Box 150, Côte d’Ivoire)

Abstract

This article examines the production costs of cocoa farming in Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa, taking into account the opportunity cost approach. To this end, surveys were conducted among 228 farmers in three regions, Bonon, Soubré and Biankouma, following an east–west gradient. The estimated costs of using family labor and land were based on the opportunity cost approach. The financial costs associated with production were also taken into account. Comparative analyses between different localities and cropping systems highlighted specific workload characteristics. Finally, a principal component analysis (PCA) was used to profile producers according to their income levels and profits. The findings showed that family labor was the main component of cocoa production costs. Prices paid to farmers did not always cover all production costs, with 38% of farmers producing at a loss, and this was contingent on the agro-ecological zone. Furthermore, the agroforestry system proved to be more economical in terms of labor than the full-sun system. These results underline the relevance of the opportunity cost approach in assessing production costs and setting cocoa selling prices. This should lead to a review of public price-setting mechanisms to ensure fair remuneration for family labor.

Suggested Citation

  • N’Golo Konaté & Auguste K. Kouakou & Yaya Ouattara & Patrick Jagoret & Yao S. S. Barima, 2025. "Evaluation of Opportunity Costs in Cocoa Production in Three Ecological Zones in Côte d’Ivoire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7478-:d:1727429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reboul, Claude, 1984. "Evaluation du coût d'emploi de la main-d'œuvre familiale sur une exploitation agricole. Contribution méthodologique," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 161.
    2. Doss, Cheryl R., 2001. "Designing Agricultural Technology for African Women Farmers: Lessons from 25 Years of Experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2075-2092, December.
    3. Charles A. Zelek & Gerald E. Shively, 2003. "Measuring the Opportunity Cost of Carbon Sequestration in Tropical Agriculture," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(3), pages 342-354.
    4. Current, Dean & Lutz, Ernst & Scherr, Sara J, 1995. "The Costs and Benefits of Agroforestry to Farmers," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 10(2), pages 151-180, August.
    5. Zuzana Hloušková & Michaela Lekešová & Anna Prajerová & Tomáš Doucha, 2022. "Assessing the Economic Viability of Agricultural Holdings with the Inclusion of Opportunity Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Claude Reboul, 1984. "Evaluation du coût d'emploi de la main-d'œuvre familiale sur une exploitation agricole. Contribution méthodologique," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 161(1), pages 15-23.
    7. Qingsheng Bi & Weiqiang Chen & Ling Li & Xiuli Wang & Enxiang Cai, 2022. "Agricultural Population Supported in Rural Areas under Traditional Planting Mode Based on Opportunity Cost Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Joshua Sikhu Okonya & Netsayi Noris Mudege & Anne M. Rietveld & Anastase Nduwayezu & Déo Kantungeko & Bernadette Marie Hakizimana & John Njuki Nyaga & Guy Blomme & James Peter Legg & Jürgen Kroschel, 2019. "The Role of Women in Production and Management of RTB Crops in Rwanda and Burundi: Do Men Decide, and Women Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Hannah Gichungi & Beatrice Muriithi & Patrick Irungu & Gracious Diiro & John Busienei, 2021. "Effect of Technological Innovation on Gender Roles: The Case of Fruit Fly IPM Adoption on Women’s Decision-Making in Mango Production and Marketing in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 407-426, June.
    4. Kiprop, Emmanuel & Okinda, Cedric & Wamuyu, Samuel & Geng, Xianhui, 2020. "Factors Influencing Smallholder Farmers Participation in Collective Marketing and the Extent of Participation in Improved Indigenous Chicken Markets in Baringo, Kenya," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 37(4).
    5. Ndoye Niane, Aifa Fatimata & Burger, Kees, 2012. "Gender and Experimental Measurement of Producers Risk Attitude Towards Output Market Price and its Effects on Economic Performance," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126928, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Alwang, Jeffrey & Larochelle, Catherine & Barrera, Victor, 2017. "Farm Decision Making and Gender: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 117-129.
    7. Anne Jerneck, 2018. "What about Gender in Climate Change? Twelve Feminist Lessons from Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Fisher, Monica & Kandiwa, Vongai, 2014. "Can agricultural input subsidies reduce the gender gap in modern maize adoption? Evidence from Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 101-111.
    9. Isabel Lambrecht & Monica Schuster & Sarah Asare Samwini & Laura Pelleriaux, 2018. "Changing gender roles in agriculture? Evidence from 20 years of data in Ghana," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 691-710, November.
    10. Leonard, Alycia & Nguti, Kuthea & Flores Lanza, Micaela & Hirmer, Stephanie, 2025. "Shedding light on vulnerability: Intersectional energy planning for development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Marek Zieliński & Wojciech Józwiak & Agata Żak & Tomasz Rokicki, 2025. "Development of Eco-Schemes as an Important Environmental Measure in Areas Facing Natural or Other Specific Constraints Under the Common Agriculture Policy 2023–2027: Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Kalovoto Damariis M & Kimiti Jacinta M & Manono Bonface O, 2020. "Influence of Women Empowerment on Adoption of Agroforestry Technologies to Counter Climate Change and Variability in Semi-Arid Makueni County, Kenya," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 24(2), pages 47-55, April.
    13. repec:ags:afgend:362655 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Seebens, Holger, 2008. "One size fits all? Female Headed Households, Income Risk, and Access to Resources," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43609, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Eagle, Alison J. & Manley, James G. & Smolak, Tara M., 2004. "How Costly Are Carbon Offsets? A Meta-Analysis Of Carbon Forest Sinks," Working Papers 18166, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    16. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Economics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sinks: A Review," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 237-269, September.
    17. Lim, Sung Soo & Winter-Nelson, Alex & Arends-Kuenning, Mary, 2007. "Household Bargaining Power and Agricultural Supply Response: Evidence from Ethiopian Coffee Growers," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1204-1220, July.
    18. Meemken, Eva-Marie & Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Toward Improving the Design of Sustainability Standards—A Gendered Analysis of Farmers’ Preferences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 285-298.
    19. Ochieng, Hannington Odido & Ojiem, John & Otieno, Joyce, 2019. "Farmer versus Researcher data collection methodologies: Understanding variations and associated trade-offs," AfricArxiv ncw8a, Center for Open Science.
    20. Pagiola, Stefano & Ramirez, Elias & Gobbi, Jose & de Haan, Cees & Ibrahim, Muhammad & Murgueitio, Enrique & Ruiz, Juan Pablo, 2007. "Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 374-385, December.
    21. Uzoamaka Joe-Nkamuke & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju & Esther Njuguna-Mungai & Kai Mausch, 2019. "Is there any gender gap in the production of legumes in Malawi? Evidence from the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition model," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 69-92, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7478-:d:1727429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.