IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7473-d1727283.html

The Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of the Residential Environment Quality in Northern Chinese Cities: Based on a New Evaluation Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Ge

    (Inner Mongolia Territorial Space Planning Institute, Hohhot 010013, China)

  • Jiayu Liu

    (Inner Mongolia Territorial Space Planning Institute, Hohhot 010013, China)

  • Laigen Jia

    (Inner Mongolia Territorial Space Planning Institute, Hohhot 010013, China)

  • Gaixiang Chen

    (Inner Mongolia Territorial Space Planning Institute, Hohhot 010013, China)

  • Changshun Wang

    (Inner Mongolia Territorial Space Planning Institute, Hohhot 010013, China)

  • Yuetian Wang

    (College of Resources and Environmental Economics, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070, China)

  • Hongguang Chen

    (School of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China)

  • Fanhao Meng

    (School of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China)

Abstract

Addressing the need to optimize human settlement quality in arid and semi-arid regions under rapid urbanization, this study innovatively constructs an evaluation framework integrating greenness, thermal conditions, impervious surfaces, water bodies, and air transparency. Focusing on 12 prefecture-level cities in Inner Mongolia, Northern China, it systematically reveals the spatial differentiation characteristics and driving mechanisms of human settlement quality. Findings indicate the following: (1) Regional human settlement quality exhibits a spindle-shaped structure dominated by the medium grade (Excellent: 18.13%, High: 23.34%, Medium: 46.48%, Low: 12.04%), with Ulanqab City having the highest proportion of Excellent areas (25.26%) and Ordos City the lowest proportion of Low-grade areas (6.20%), reflecting a critical transition period for regional quality enhancement. (2) Spatial patterns show pronounced east-west gradients and functional differentiation: western arid zones display significant blue-green space advantages but face high-temperature stress and rigid water constraints, eastern humid zones benefit from superior ecological foundations with weaker heat island effects, the core Hetao Plain experiences strong heat island effects due to high impervious surface density, while industrial cities confront prominent air pollution pressures. Consequently, implementing differentiated strategies—strengthening ecological protection/restoration in High/Low-grade zones and optimizing regulation to drive upgrades in Medium-grade zones—is essential for achieving three sustainable pathways: compact development, blue-green space optimization, and industrial upgrading, providing vital decision-making support for enhancing human settlement quality and promoting sustainable development in ecologically fragile cities across northern China.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Ge & Jiayu Liu & Laigen Jia & Gaixiang Chen & Changshun Wang & Yuetian Wang & Hongguang Chen & Fanhao Meng, 2025. "The Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of the Residential Environment Quality in Northern Chinese Cities: Based on a New Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7473-:d:1727283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiancheng Xie & Yan Zhang & Xiaoyu Song, 2024. "Research on the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of common prosperity in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1851-1877, January.
    2. Michael P Johnson, 2001. "Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(4), pages 717-735, April.
    3. Roberto Sanchez Rodriguez & Diana Ürge-Vorsatz & Aliyu Salisu Barau, 2018. "Sustainable Development Goals and climate change adaptation in cities," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 181-183, March.
    4. Djacinto Monteiro dos Santos & Renata Libonati & Beatriz N Garcia & João L Geirinhas & Barbara Bresani Salvi & Eliane Lima e Silva & Julia A Rodrigues & Leonardo F Peres & Ana Russo & Renata Gracie & , 2024. "Twenty-first-century demographic and social inequalities of heat-related deaths in Brazilian urban areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Jaejun Seo & Sunwoong Yoon & Jiwoo Kim & Kyusang Kwon, 2025. "Regional Youth Population Prediction Using LSTM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Bäckström & Erika Sandow & Olle Westerlund, 2016. "Commuting and timing of retirement," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 125-152, January.
    2. Ravijanya Chippagiri & Hindavi R. Gavali & Rahul V. Ralegaonkar & Mike Riley & Andy Shaw & Ana Bras, 2021. "Application of Sustainable Prefabricated Wall Technology for Energy Efficient Social Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Thomas Bolognesi, 2015. "The water vulnerability of metro and megacities: An investigation of structural determinants," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(2), pages 123-133, May.
    4. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Shannon Rogers & Semra Aytur & Kevin Gardner & Cynthia Carlson, 2012. "Measuring community sustainability: exploring the intersection of the built environment & social capital with a participatory case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 143-153, June.
    6. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Abubakar, Ismaila Rimi & Onyebueke, Victor U. & Lawanson, Taibat & Barau, Aliyu Salisu & Bununu, Yakubu Aliyu, 2025. "Urban planning strategies for addressing climate change in Lagos megacity, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Zhou, Zhifang & Yang, Zhuoxuan & Li, Huijia & Liu, Jinhao, 2025. "Regional climate change action and corporate ESG performance - Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. József Lennert & Jenő Zsolt Farkas & András Donát Kovács & András Molnár & Rita Módos & Dorián Baka & Zoltán Kovács, 2020. "Measuring and Predicting Long-Term Land Cover Changes in the Functional Urban Area of Budapest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. David Gálvez Ruiz & Pilar Diaz Cuevas & Olta Braçe & Marco Garrido-Cumbrera, 2018. "Developing an Index to Measure Sub-municipal Level Urban Sprawl," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 929-952, December.
    11. Bereitschaft, Bradley, 2020. "Gentrification and the evolution of commuting behavior within America's urban cores, 2000–2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Tomaso Ceccarelli & Luca Salvati & Sofia Bajocco & Pier Luigi Perini, 2015. "Land-Use Trajectories and ?Syndromes? of Land Degradation in Northern Italy," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 85-98.
    13. Catherine M. H. Keske & Adam Mayer, 2014. "Visitor Willingness to Pay U.S. Forest Service Recreation Fees in New West Rural Mountain Economies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(1), pages 87-100, February.
    14. Liyin Shen & Chenyang Shuai & Liudan Jiao & Yongtao Tan & Xiangnan Song, 2016. "A Global Perspective on the Sustainable Performance of Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Diluiso, Francesca & Guastella, Gianni & Pareglio, Stefano, 2021. "Changes in urban green spaces’ value perception: A meta-analytic benefit transfer function for European cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Teixeira, João Filipe & Silva, Cecília & Seisenberger, Sebastian & Büttner, Benjamin & McCormick, Bartosz & Papa, Enrica & Cao, Mengqiu, 2024. "Classifying 15-minute Cities: A review of worldwide practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Sebastian Eichhorn & Oliver Harig & Stefan Siedentop & Robert Hecht, 2025. "Assessing the suitability of settlement delineations for monitoring infilling: A web- and GIS-based expert evaluation approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(7), pages 1735-1755, September.
    18. Benedetto Manganelli & Beniamino Murgante & Lucia Saganeiti, 2020. "The Social Cost of Urban Sprinkling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Davide Burgalassi & Tommaso Luzzati, 2015. "Urban spatial structure and environmental emissions: a survey of the literature and some empirical evidence for Italian NUTS-3 regions," Discussion Papers 2015/199, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Fischer, Beate & Klauer, Bernd & Schiller, Johannes, 2013. "Prospects for sustainable land-use policy in Germany: Experimenting with a sustainability heuristic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 213-220.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7473-:d:1727283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.