IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7463-d1727066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Stress Testing and the Evaluation of Flood Resilience in Mountain Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Mingjun Yin

    (Institute of Public Safety Research, School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Hong Huang

    (Institute of Public Safety Research, School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Fucai Yu

    (Beijing Academy of Emergency Management Science and Technology, Beijing 101101, China)

  • Aizhi Wu

    (Beijing Academy of Emergency Management Science and Technology, Beijing 101101, China)

  • Yingchun Tao

    (Beijing Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Xiaoxiao Sun

    (Institute of Public Safety Research, School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events pose significant challenges to mountain communities, particularly in terms of flash flood risks. This study presents a framework for stress testing and evaluating flood resilience in mountain communities through the integration of high-resolution InfoWorks ICM two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling and systematic resilience assessment. The framework makes three key innovations: (1) multi-scale temporal stress scenarios combining short-duration extreme events (1–2 h) with long-duration persistent events (24 h) and historical extremes; (2) integrated infrastructure–drainage stress analysis that explicitly models roads’ dual role as critical infrastructure and emergency drainage channels; and (3) dynamic resilience quantification under multiple stressors across 15 systematically designed stress conditions. Using Western Beijing as a case study, the model is validated, achieving Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.9, demonstrating its robust capability in simulating complex mountainous terrain flood processes. Through systematic analysis of fifteen rainfall scenarios designed based on Chicago rainfall patterns and historical events (including the July 2023 Haihe River basin flood), encompassing various intensities (30–200 mm/h), durations (1 h, 2 h, 24 h), and return periods (10, 50, 100 years), the key findings include the following: (1) A rainfall intensity of 60 mm/h represents a crucial threshold for system performance, beyond which significant impacts on community infrastructure emerge, with built-up areas experiencing inundation depths of 0.27–0.4 m that exceed safe passage limits. (2) Road networks become primary drainage channels during intense precipitation, with velocities exceeding 5 m/s in village roads and exceeding 5 m/s in country road sections, creating significant hazard potential. (3) Four major risk spots were identified with distinct waterlogging patterns, characterized by maximum depths ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 m and recovery periods varying from 2 to 12 hours depending on the topographic confluence effects and drainage efficiency. (4) The system demonstrates strong recovery capability, achieving >90% recovery within 3–6 hours for short-duration events, while showing vulnerability to extreme scenarios, with performance declining to 0.75–0.80, highlighting the coupling effects between water depth and flow velocity in steep terrain. This research provides quantitative insights for flood risk management and for enhancing community resilience in mountainous regions, offering valuable guidance for infrastructure improvement, emergency response optimization, and sustainable community development. This study primarily focuses on physical resilience aspects, with socioeconomic and institutional dimensions representing important directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingjun Yin & Hong Huang & Fucai Yu & Aizhi Wu & Yingchun Tao & Xiaoxiao Sun, 2025. "Study on Stress Testing and the Evaluation of Flood Resilience in Mountain Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7463-:d:1727066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7463-:d:1727066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.