IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7426-d1726327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Analysis of the Business Environment in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Zhao

    (College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China)

  • Qiang Wei

    (School of Business, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

Cultivating the best business environment ecosystem is important for advancing market-oriented reforms and achieving sustainable industrial transformation. How to quantify the business environment is also a relatively complex topic. Based on urban ecology theory, this study constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing urban business environment development. Using the entropy weight method and spatial autocorrelation analysis, we examine the time series and spatial evolution of the business environment in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area from 2008 to 2021. Meanwhile, we further explore the main factors that influence the development level of the business environment. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to improve the business environment. The results show that (1) the development level of the business environment has gradually improved during the sample period, with stable growth from 2008 to 2015, followed by rapid development after 2015; (2) from different dimensions, there is an imbalance in the business environment development among cities within the Greater Bay Area, with core cities performing better than others; (3) from a spatial perspective, the business environment presents a “core-periphery” pattern, with higher levels clustered around the Pearl River Estuary, indicating strong spatial agglomeration. This research provides theoretical support and policy recommendations for the Three-Year Action Plan for Creating a World-Class Business Environment in the Greater Bay Area.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Zhao & Qiang Wei, 2025. "Measurement and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Analysis of the Business Environment in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-37, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7426-:d:1726327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7426/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7426/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim, 2012. "The impact of business regulatory reforms on economic growth," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 285-307.
    2. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    3. Carlin, Wendy & Schaffer, Mark, 2012. "Understanding the business environment in South Asia : evidence from firm-level surveys," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6160, The World Bank.
    4. Benjamin P. Eifert, 2009. "Do Regulatory Reforms Stimulate Investment and Growth? Evidence from the Doing Business Data, 2003-07," Working Papers 159, Center for Global Development.
    5. Boyd Cohen, 2006. "Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Ciftci, Mustafa & Cready, William M., 2011. "Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 62-80, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    2. Rafiou Raphaël Bétila, 2021. "The impact of Ease of Doing Business on economic growth: a dynamic panel analysis for African countries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(10), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Allan O’Connor & David Audretsch, 2023. "Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: learning from forest ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1051-1079, March.
    4. Bessagnet, Arnauld & Crespo, Joan & Vicente, Jérôme, 2021. "Unraveling the multi-scalar and evolutionary forces of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A historical event analysis applied to IoT Valley," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Isidre March-Chordà & Consolación Adame-Sánchez & Rosa María Yagüe-Perales, 2021. "Key locational factors for immigrant entrepreneurs in top entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1049-1066, September.
    6. Theodoraki, Christina & Dana, Léo-Paul & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 346-360.
    7. Guo, Pengwei & He, Yongda & Scrimgeour, Frank & Shao, Shuai & Yu, Yuting, 2024. "The impact of natural resource dependency on green economic growth: A business environment perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    8. Qingjie Zhou & Dongyao Yu & Feng Xu & Jiamin Sun, 2022. "The Impact of Institutional Friction Cost on Economic Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Abraham K. Song, 2019. "The Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem—a critique and reconfiguration," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 569-590, October.
    10. Sarma, Sumita & Sunny, Sanwar A., 2017. "Civic entrepreneurial ecosystems: Smart city emergence in Kansas City," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 843-853.
    11. Zhiyuan Dong & Zenglian Zhang, 2022. "Does the Business Environment Improve the Sustainable Development of Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Kirkpatrick, Colin, 2012. "Economic Governance: Improving the Economic and Regulatory Environment for Supporting Private Sector Activity," WIDER Working Paper Series 108, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    14. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Kaur, Puneet & Ferraris, Alberto & Bresciani, Stefano & Dhir, Amandeep, 2024. "Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Colin Kirkpatrick, 2012. "Economic Governance: Improving the Economic and Regulatory Environment for Supporting Private Sector Activity," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-108, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    16. Jonas Mendes Constante & Peter W. Langen & Salvador Furió Pruñonosa, 2023. "Innovation ecosystems in ports: a comparative analysis of Rotterdam and Valencia," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Lawrence Dumisani Nyathi & Mbheki Mlobane, 2024. "The Role of Ease of Doing Business in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in the SADC Region," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 2587-2602, May.
    18. Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Raffaello Balocco, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1291-1321, December.
    19. Gianluca Elia & Alessandro Margherita & Claudio Petti, 2016. "An Operational Model to Develop Technology Entrepreneurship “EGO-System”," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(05), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Haibin Liu & Sadan Kulturel-Konak & Abdullah Konak, 2021. "Key Elements and Their Roles in Entrepreneurship Education Ecosystem: Comparative Review and Suggestions for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7426-:d:1726327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.