IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7404-d1725605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Practices in Coastal Marinas: A Comparative Study of Monaco and Ibiza

Author

Listed:
  • Florin Ioras

    (Research and Enterprise Unit, Buckinghamshire New University, Queen Alexandra Road, High Wycombe, Bucks HP11 2JZ, UK
    Doctoral School, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Universitatea Transilvania din Brasov, B-dul Eroilor nr. 29, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Indrachapa Bandara

    (School of Computing and Communication, Faculty of STEM, The Open University, Walton Hall, Kents Hill, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in driving sustainable change across coastal and marine environments. Artificial intelligence offers strong support for environmental decision-making by helping to process complex data, anticipate outcomes, and fine-tune day-to-day operations. In busy coastal zones such as the Mediterranean where tourism and boating place significant strain on marine ecosystems, AI can be an effective means for marinas to reduce their ecological impact without sacrificing economic viability. This research examines the contribution of artificial intelligence toward the development of environmental sustainability in marina management. It investigates how AI can potentially reconcile economic imperatives with ecological conservation, especially in high-traffic coastal areas. Through a focus on the impact of social and technological context, this study emphasizes the way in which local conditions constrain the design, deployment, and reach of AI systems. The marinas of Ibiza and Monaco are used as a comparative backdrop to depict these dynamics. In Monaco, efforts like the SEA Index ® and predictive maintenance for superyachts contributed to a 28% drop in CO 2 emissions between 2020 and 2025. In contrast, Ibiza focused on circular economy practices, reaching an 85% landfill diversion rate using solar power, AI-assisted waste systems, and targeted biodiversity conservation initiatives. This research organizes AI tools into three main categories: supervised learning, anomaly detection, and rule-based systems. Their effectiveness is assessed using statistical techniques, including t -test results contextualized with Cohen’s d to convey practical effect sizes. Regression R 2 values are interpreted in light of real-world policy relevance, such as thresholds for energy audits or emissions certification. In addition to measuring technical outcomes, this study considers the ethical concerns, the role of local communities, and comparisons to global best practices. The findings highlight how artificial intelligence can meaningfully contribute to environmental conservation while also supporting sustainable economic development in maritime contexts. However, the analysis also reveals ongoing difficulties, particularly in areas such as ethical oversight, regulatory coherence, and the practical replication of successful initiatives across diverse regions. In response, this study outlines several practical steps forward: promoting AI-as-a-Service models to lower adoption barriers, piloting regulatory sandboxes within the EU to test innovative solutions safely, improving access to open-source platforms, and working toward common standards for the stewardship of marine environmental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Florin Ioras & Indrachapa Bandara, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Practices in Coastal Marinas: A Comparative Study of Monaco and Ibiza," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7404-:d:1725605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7404/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7404/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Burch & John Robinson, 2007. "A framework for explaining the links between capacity and action in response to global climate change," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 304-316, July.
    2. Mariam I. Adeoba & Thanyani Pandelani & Harry Ngwangwa & Tracy Masebe, 2025. "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Ocean Waste Tracking and Management: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilar Jiménez-Medina & Andrés Artal-Tur & Noelia Sánchez-Casado, 2021. "Tourism Business, Place Identity, Sustainable Development, and Urban Resilience: A Focus on the Sociocultural Dimension," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(1), pages 170-199, January.
    2. Rebecca Page & Lisa Dilling, 2020. "How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 499-516, August.
    3. repec:sae:envval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:481-501 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dirk Heinrichs & Kerstin Krellenberg & Michail Fragkias, 2013. "Urban Responses to Climate Change: Theories and Governance Practice in Cities of the Global South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1865-1878, November.
    5. Patricia Romero-Lankao & Sara Hughes & Angelica Rosas-Huerta & Roxana Borquez & Daniel M Gnatz, 2013. "Institutional Capacity for Climate Change Responses: An Examination of Construction and Pathways in Mexico City and Santiago," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(5), pages 785-805, October.
    6. Patricia Romero-Lankao & Daniel M. Gnatz & Olga Wilhelmi & Mary Hayden, 2016. "Urban Sustainability and Resilience: From Theory to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Julie L. MacArthur, 2017. "Trade, Tarsands and Treaties: The Political Economy Context of Community Energy in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Mohamed Esham & Chris Garforth, 2013. "Agricultural adaptation to climate change: insights from a farming community in Sri Lanka," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 535-549, June.
    9. Alex Y. Lo & Faith Chan, 2017. "Preparing for flooding in England and Wales: the role of risk perception and the social context in driving individual action," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 367-387, August.
    10. Jose DiBella & Nigel Forrest & Sarah Burch & Jennifer Rao‐Williams & Scott Morton Ninomiya & Verena Hermelingmeier & Kyra Chisholm, 2023. "Exploring the potential of SMEs to build individual, organizational, and community resilience through sustainability‐oriented business practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 721-735, January.
    11. Nugun Patrick Jellason & Richard N. Baines & John S. Conway & Chukwuma C. Ogbaga, 2019. "Climate Change Perceptions and Attitudes to Smallholder Adaptation in Northwestern Nigerian Drylands," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Liu, Yong, 2014. "Barriers to the adoption of low carbon production: A multiple-case study of Chinese industrial firms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 412-421.
    13. Johannes Welling & Þorvarður Árnason & Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, 2020. "Implications of Climate Change on Nature-Based Tourism Demand: A Segmentation Analysis of Glacier Site Visitors in Southeast Iceland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Burch, Sarah, 2010. "In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: An examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7575-7585, December.
    15. Edward Sanneh & Allen Hu & Chia-Wei Hsu & Momodou Njie, 2014. "Prioritization of climate change adaptation approaches in the Gambia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(8), pages 1163-1178, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7404-:d:1725605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.