IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7402-d1725561.html

Upcycling Arundo donax Biomass: A Systematic Review of Applications, Materials, and Environmental Benefits for Greener Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Rosanna Leone

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Bld. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Luisa Lombardo

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Bld. 8-14, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Federica Marchese Ragona

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Bld. 8-14, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Tiziana Campisi

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Bld. 8-14, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Manfredi Saeli

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Bld. 8-14, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review on the reuse of Arundo donax as a secondary renewable raw material for sustainable construction. Originally classified as a dangerously invasive species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Arundo donax has recently gained recognition as a non-conventional promising biomass resource, particularly in the context of green innovation and circular economy strategies in light of the European Green Deal and the New European Bauhaus initiatives. This review combines bibliometric mapping and full-text analysis, leading to the selection of 20 peer-reviewed studies, thematically clustered into two main application areas: the development of panels and composites with improved mechanical, thermal, and acoustic performance; and the use of this species in geotechnical or low-tech solutions, such as earth construction and erosion control. While most contributions are recent and technically oriented, this review highlights several critical gaps, such as the lack of standardized testing protocols, the limited number of environmental assessments, and the absence of long-term performance evaluations. Despite these limitations, the considered biomass shows significant potential to support regenerative design strategies for the built environment. Future research should prioritize comparative LCA studies, industrial scalability, and the formulation of guidelines to integrate Arundo donax -based materials into sustainable construction practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosanna Leone & Luisa Lombardo & Federica Marchese Ragona & Tiziana Campisi & Manfredi Saeli, 2025. "Upcycling Arundo donax Biomass: A Systematic Review of Applications, Materials, and Environmental Benefits for Greener Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7402-:d:1725561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7402/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7402/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raphaele Malheiro & Aurora Morillas & Adriana Ansolin & Jorge Fernandes & Aires Camões & Maria Teresa Amorim & Sandra Monteiro Silva & Ricardo Mateus, 2023. "Thermal Performance and Durability Evaluation of Arundo Donax towards an Improvement in the Knowledge of Sustainable Building Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    3. Raphaele Malheiro & Adriana Ansolin & Christiane Guarnier & Jorge Fernandes & Maria Teresa Amorim & Sandra Monteiro Silva & Ricardo Mateus, 2021. "The Potential of the Reed as a Regenerative Building Material—Characterisation of Its Durability, Physical, and Thermal Performances," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    2. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    4. Niccolò Comerio & Fernanda Strozzi, 2019. "Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 109-131, February.
    5. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    6. Manish Tomar & Sunil Prajapat & Dheeraj Kumar & Pankaj Kumar & Rajesh Kumar & Athanasios V. Vasilakos, 2025. "Exploring the Role of Material Science in Advancing Quantum Machine Learning: A Scientometric Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. M. M. Ahmed & A. Sadoon & M. T. Bassuoni & A. Ghazy, 2024. "Utilizing Agricultural Residues from Hot and Cold Climates as Sustainable SCMs for Low-Carbon Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-37, December.
    9. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., . "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4).
    10. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Urša Golob & Mark A. P. Davies & Joachim Kernstock & Shaun M. Powell, 2020. "Trending topics plus future challenges and opportunities in brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 123-129, March.
    12. Natalya Ivanova & Ekaterina Zolotova, 2023. "Landolt Indicator Values in Modern Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    15. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    16. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    17. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    20. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7402-:d:1725561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.