IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7367-d1724684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Demonstration Models on Agricultural Climate-Smart Technology Adoption: Evidence from China’s Cotton Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Cai

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China)

  • Zhenggui Zhang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China
    State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Shaohua Mao

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China)

  • Jamshed Azimov

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China)

  • Nilupaier Yusufujiang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China
    College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Yaopeng Zhang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China)

  • Rusheng Bi

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China)

  • Lin Wang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China)

  • Zhanbiao Wang

    (Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China
    State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China)

  • Lei Gao

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Crop Gene Editing and Germplasm Innovation, Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China
    State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China)

Abstract

Amid escalating global climate challenges and the accelerating transition toward low-carbon agriculture, the effective diffusion of climate-smart technologies (CSTs) has become a critical pathway to achieving sustainable agricultural development. This study focuses on cotton farmers in Xinjiang and draws on micro-level survey data from 504 respondents to construct an analytical framework of “demonstration–cognition–adoption”. It systematically examines the impact pathways and mediating mechanisms of different demonstration models. The findings reveal that technology demonstration indirectly influences farmers’ adoption of CSTs by shaping their cognitive perceptions, with perceived operational utility emerging as the most critical mediating mechanism in the entire technology dissemination chain. Among current extension models, government-led demonstrations play a central role, while the effectiveness of enterprise-led demonstrations hinges on brand credibility and service quality. Moreover, the ease of operation of a technology outweighs its economic returns in determining adoption outcomes, and farmers exhibit significant heterogeneity in their responses to different demonstration types. Based on these insights, the study recommends the development of a stratified and differentiated dissemination strategy, the strengthening of government-led demonstration functions, the promotion of standardized enterprise participation, and the enhancement of both farmers’ cognitive understanding and technology fit to enable broader and higher-quality adoption of climate-smart technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Cai & Zhenggui Zhang & Shaohua Mao & Jamshed Azimov & Nilupaier Yusufujiang & Yaopeng Zhang & Rusheng Bi & Lin Wang & Zhanbiao Wang & Lei Gao, 2025. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Demonstration Models on Agricultural Climate-Smart Technology Adoption: Evidence from China’s Cotton Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7367-:d:1724684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7367-:d:1724684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.