IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7215-d1721194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Formation and Evolution of the Resilience of Resource-Based Enterprises Under Continuous Institutional Shocks: An Explanation from the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Chen

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Zhiying Wang

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
    Department of Economics and Management, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan 030008, China)

  • Dongxia Liu

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Linda Han

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

From the perspective of organizational legitimacy acquisition, this study elucidates the sources and formation pathways of resource-based enterprises’ resilience in the face of institutional shocks. It explores the evolution of resilience with the improvement of the resource-based enterprises’ legitimacy under institutional constraints. Using the new mining rights of the resource-based enterprises as the measured variable of organizational resilience under institutional shocks, this study describes the adaptability of the resource-based enterprises to institutional change from the subdivision dimension of pragmatic legitimacy and moral legitimacy. A multi-period fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) approach is adopted, which takes Chinese mining enterprises listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange as samples to obtain the formation pathways and dynamic evolution characteristics of the resilience of the resource-based enterprises under the institutional shocks of the “supply-side structural reforms” (2016–2019) and the “dual-carbon” goals (2020–2022). The results indicate that the differences of institutional shock strength and constraint degree promote different resilience formation mechanisms. The high intensity and hard constraints of the supply-side structural reforms promote the high-resilience pathways of the enterprises based on pragmatic legitimacy. The guiding and incentive orientation of the “dual-carbon” goals promote more improvement in the moral legitimacy of the enterprises, forming high-resilience pathways of “pragmatic legitimacy + moral legitimacy”. Under continuous institutional shocks, influence legitimacy has a universal effect on the formation of high resilience by the resource-based enterprises, and structural legitimacy, as the core condition of the high-resilience pathways, demonstrates continuity. By increasing the subdivision dimension of moral legitimacy and mitigating the limitations of pragmatic legitimacy, resource-based enterprises can achieve breakthroughs in their pathways to high resilience. This study provides valuable insights and guidance for resource-based enterprises seeking to overcome future institutional shocks and achieve resilient growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Chen & Zhiying Wang & Dongxia Liu & Linda Han, 2025. "The Formation and Evolution of the Resilience of Resource-Based Enterprises Under Continuous Institutional Shocks: An Explanation from the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7215-:d:1721194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7215-:d:1721194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.