IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7215-d1721194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Formation and Evolution of the Resilience of Resource-Based Enterprises Under Continuous Institutional Shocks: An Explanation from the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Chen

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Zhiying Wang

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
    Department of Economics and Management, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan 030008, China)

  • Dongxia Liu

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Linda Han

    (School of Management Science & Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

From the perspective of organizational legitimacy acquisition, this study elucidates the sources and formation pathways of resource-based enterprises’ resilience in the face of institutional shocks. It explores the evolution of resilience with the improvement of the resource-based enterprises’ legitimacy under institutional constraints. Using the new mining rights of the resource-based enterprises as the measured variable of organizational resilience under institutional shocks, this study describes the adaptability of the resource-based enterprises to institutional change from the subdivision dimension of pragmatic legitimacy and moral legitimacy. A multi-period fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) approach is adopted, which takes Chinese mining enterprises listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange as samples to obtain the formation pathways and dynamic evolution characteristics of the resilience of the resource-based enterprises under the institutional shocks of the “supply-side structural reforms” (2016–2019) and the “dual-carbon” goals (2020–2022). The results indicate that the differences of institutional shock strength and constraint degree promote different resilience formation mechanisms. The high intensity and hard constraints of the supply-side structural reforms promote the high-resilience pathways of the enterprises based on pragmatic legitimacy. The guiding and incentive orientation of the “dual-carbon” goals promote more improvement in the moral legitimacy of the enterprises, forming high-resilience pathways of “pragmatic legitimacy + moral legitimacy”. Under continuous institutional shocks, influence legitimacy has a universal effect on the formation of high resilience by the resource-based enterprises, and structural legitimacy, as the core condition of the high-resilience pathways, demonstrates continuity. By increasing the subdivision dimension of moral legitimacy and mitigating the limitations of pragmatic legitimacy, resource-based enterprises can achieve breakthroughs in their pathways to high resilience. This study provides valuable insights and guidance for resource-based enterprises seeking to overcome future institutional shocks and achieve resilient growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Chen & Zhiying Wang & Dongxia Liu & Linda Han, 2025. "The Formation and Evolution of the Resilience of Resource-Based Enterprises Under Continuous Institutional Shocks: An Explanation from the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7215-:d:1721194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Naughton, 2007. "The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262640643, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abasov, Muzaffar, 2017. "Comparison of Chinese reform experience with other transition economies (in the example of Russia)," MPRA Paper 79841, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jarreau, Joachim & Poncet, Sandra, 2012. "Export sophistication and economic growth: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 281-292.
    3. Da Teng & Douglas B. Fuller & Chengchun Li, 2018. "Institutional change and corporate governance diversity in China’s SOEs," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 273-293, May.
    4. Christian Dreger & Tongsan Wang & Yanqun Zhang, 2015. "Understanding Chinese Consumption: The Impact of Hukou," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(6), pages 1331-1344, November.
    5. Sai Ding & Alessandra Guariglia & John Knight & Junhong Yang, 2021. "Negative Investment in China: Financing Constraints and Restructuring versus Growth," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1411-1449.
    6. Chen, Shuo & Lan, Xiaohuan, 2020. "Tractor vs. animal: Rural reforms and technology adoption in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson, 2025. "Trading Places: Mobility Responses of Native- and Foreign-Born Adults to the China Trade Shock," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(1), pages 10-36, January.
    8. Yong He & Hong Zhou, 2011. "Estimating Chinese Interprovincial OutPut Spillovers with Provincial Input-Output Tables," CERDI Working papers halshs-00553102, HAL.
    9. Machacek, Erika & Fold, Niels, 2014. "Alternative value chains for rare earths: The Anglo-deposit developers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-64.
    10. David H. Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson & Jae Song, 2014. "Trade Adjustment: Worker-Level Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(4), pages 1799-1860.
    11. Prema-chandra Athukorala & Hal Hill, 2010. "Asian trade: long-term patterns and key policy issues," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 24(2), pages 52-82, November.
    12. Maria ADAMAKOU & Dimitris KALLIORAS, 2024. "Detecting For Convergence Trends Among Chinese Universities In Terms Of Academic Performance," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 25-31, June.
    13. Yang, Jie & Ma, Jieqiong & Zhang, Yong & Hong, JungHwa, 2018. "With whom should you have dinner? A multidimensional framework for understanding political ties in China," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 891-898.
    14. Xia, Tianjiao & Liu, Xiaohui, 2022. "The innovation paradox of TMT political capital in transition economy firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 775-790.
    15. Carlos Garriga & Aaron Hedlund & Yang Tang & Ping Wang, 2023. "Rural-Urban Migration, Structural Transformation, and Housing Markets in China," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 413-440, April.
    16. Nicholas Lardy, 2016. "The Changing Role of the Private Sector in China," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Iris Day & John Simon (ed.),Structural Change in China: Implications for Australia and the World, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    17. Christopher Marquis & Cuili Qian, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 127-148, February.
    18. Zhiyong Liu & Yue Qiao, 2012. "Abuse of Market Dominance Under China’s 2007 Anti-monopoly Law: A Preliminary Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(1), pages 77-107, August.
    19. Dekle, Robert & Vandenbroucke, Guillaume, 2012. "A quantitative analysis of China's structural transformation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 119-135.
    20. Sai Ding & John Knight & Xiao Zhang, 2019. "Does China overinvest? Evidence from a panel of Chinese firms," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 489-507, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7215-:d:1721194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.