IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7181-d1720346.html

Does Governance Influence Community Support in Conservation and Ecological Sustainability of Wildlife Conservancies? Lessons from Northern Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Molu Wato

    (Faculty of Law, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 30197, Kenya)

  • Richard Mulwa

    (CASELAP, Faculty of Law, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 30197, Kenya
    Environment for Development-Kenya (EfD-K), Department of Economics and Development Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 30197, Kenya
    Liebig Centre for Agroecology and Climate Impact Research, Justus Liebig University, 35390 Gießen, Germany)

  • Mohamud Jama

    (Department of Economics and Development Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 30197, Kenya)

Abstract

The Community-Based Conservation (CBC) approach views local people as interested parties who should actively participate in and control conservation efforts, which contrasts with the conventional 'fortress conservation' common in government-protected areas isolated from human disturbance. The transition from fortress conservation to CBC, however, has not been a smooth journey for many African countries, especially in the sub-Saharan Africa region. This is because, in some cases, local communities do not see themselves as part of the governance structure of these conservancies, which affects the long-term ecological sustainability of the conservancies. Using eight (8) conservancies in the arid and semi-arid counties of Isiolo and Samburu, Kenya, this study used exploratory research to gather data from 24 Focus Group Discussions (FDGs) and forty-eight (48) key informant interviews (KIIs) to assess the influence of communities’ involvement on ecological outcomes of the conservancies. Other secondary sources also supported the primary data sources. Our findings showed that the governance model does influence community support for conservancies, and the benefits that communities receive or expect from the conservancies also have a strong influence on their support for conservation. However, it was established that community conservancies have brought positive changes to the wildlife population trends and habitat health. The study recommends the development of the National Rangelands Resources Management Policy and institutional arrangements to strengthen and safeguard the future of wildlife conservation within those conservancies and to provide clarity on the roles of different stakeholders. The study also recommends further studies on the actual impact of governance on community perception, the value of existing investments in community benefits, and the long-term implications of climate change impacts on conservancy ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Molu Wato & Richard Mulwa & Mohamud Jama, 2025. "Does Governance Influence Community Support in Conservation and Ecological Sustainability of Wildlife Conservancies? Lessons from Northern Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7181-:d:1720346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lara Domínguez & Colin Luoma, 2020. "Decolonising Conservation Policy: How Colonial Land and Conservation Ideologies Persist and Perpetuate Indigenous Injustices at the Expense of the Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Meed Mbidzo & Helen Newing & Jessica P. R. Thorn, 2021. "Can Nationally Prescribed Institutional Arrangements Enable Community-Based Conservation? An Analysis of Conservancies and Community Forests in the Zambezi Region of Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ongolo, Symphorien & Giessen, Lukas & Karsenty, Alain & Tchamba, Martin & Krott, Max, 2021. "Forestland policies and politics in Africa: Recent evidence and new challenges," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Kar, Sabyasachi & Sinha, Gaurav R. & Dwivedi, Puneet, 2025. "Rules and interactions around customary tree ownership in forested public lands: A qualitative study in Jharkhand, India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Banki T. Chunwate & Robert A. Marchant & Eleanor K. K. Jew & Lindsay C. Stringer, 2025. "Understanding Local Perspectives on the Trajectory and Drivers of Gazetted Forest Reserve Change in Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Liliana Lizarazo-Rodriguez & Alice Lopes Fabris & Doreen Montag, 2025. "Indigenous peoples as trustees of forests: a bio-socio-cultural approach to international law," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 145-170, March.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:gjps6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Shah, Shipra & Race, Digby, 2024. "Greening the blue Pacific: Lessons on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Adam P. Hejnowicz & Jessica P. R. Thorn, 2022. "Environmental Policy Design and Implementation: Toward a Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Meine van Noordwijk, 2021. "Agroforestry-Based Ecosystem Services: Reconciling Values of Humans and Nature in Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Kadhikwa, Sakeus & Bollig, Michael & Domptail, Stéphanie Eileen, 2026. "Pan-ontological institutional bricolage? The urgent need for a dialogue between state and customary authorities in Namibian conservancies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Alberto Jonay Rodríguez-Darias & Pablo Díaz-Rodríguez, 2023. "Some Considerations on the Implications of Protected Areas for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Indra Mani Rai & Gavin Melles & Suresh Gautam, 2023. "Community Development for Bote in Chitwan National Park, Nepal: A Political Ecology of Development Logic of Erasure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Laÿna Droz & Martin F Fricke & Nakul Heroor & Romaric Jannel & Orika Komatsubara & Concordia Marie A Lagasca-Hiloma & Paul Mart Jeyand J Matangcas & Hesron H Sihombing, 2025. "Environmental philosophy in Asia: Between eco-orientalism and ecological nationalisms," Environmental Values, , vol. 34(1), pages 84-108, February.
    13. Yuthasak Chatkaewnapanon & Timothy J. Lee, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Community-Based Tourism in the Context of Thailand: Community, Development, and the Foresight Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Addison, Prue & Arlidge, William & Baker, Julia & Booth, Hollie & Brooks, Thomas & Bull, Joseph & Burgass, Michael & Ekstrom, Jonathan & Ermgassen, Sophus zu, 2020. "Four Steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework," SocArXiv gjps6, Center for Open Science.
    15. Graeme Reed & Nicolas D. Brunet & Deborah McGregor & Curtis Scurr & Tonio Sadik & Jamie Lavigne & Sheri Longboat, 2024. "There is no word for ‘nature’ in our language: rethinking nature-based solutions from the perspective of Indigenous Peoples located in Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Kusters, Koen & de Graaf, Maartje & Ascarrunz, Nataly & Benneker, Charlotte & Boot, René & van Kanten, Rudi & Livingstone, John & Maindo, Alphonse & Mendoza, Heidi & Purwanto, Edi & Rodríguez, Carlos , 2022. "Formalizing community forest tenure rights: A theory of change and conditions for success," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Wolde, Akalu Assfaw & Bertacchini, Enrico, 2025. "Forest property rights within community forests and their role in enhancing economic well-being in rural Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. J. Marc Foggin & Daniele Brombal & Ali Razmkhah, 2021. "Thinking Like a Mountain: Exploring the Potential of Relational Approaches for Transformative Nature Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Michele F. Fontefrancesco & Dauro M. Zocchi & Andrea Pieroni, 2023. "The Intersections between Food and Cultural Landscape: Insights from Three Mountain Case Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Pietro De Marinis & Samuele De Petris & Filippo Sarvia & Giacinto Manfron & Evelyn Joan Momo & Tommaso Orusa & Gianmarco Corvino & Guido Sali & Enrico Mondino Borgogno, 2021. "Supporting Pro-Poor Reforms of Agricultural Systems in Eastern DRC (Africa) with Remotely Sensed Data: A Possible Contribution of Spatial Entropy to Interpret Land Management Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    21. Layna Droz & Hsun-Mei Chen & Hung-Tao Chu & Rika Fajrini & Jerry Imbong & Romaric Jannel & Orika Komatsubara & Concordia Marie A. Lagasca-Hiloma & Chansatya Meas & Duy Hung Nguyen & Tshering Ongmu She, 2022. "Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of nature in East and South-East Asia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7181-:d:1720346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.