IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7174-d1720253.html

MOORA-Based Assessment of Educational Sustainability Performance in EU-27 Countries: Comparing Pre-Pandemic (2017–2019) and Pandemic-Affected (2020–2022) Periods

Author

Listed:
  • Ikram Khatrouch

    (Laboratory Quartz EA 7393, IUT Montreuil, Paris 8 University, F-93100 Montreuil, France)

  • Hatem Belhouchet

    (The Research Laboratory Societies & Humanities (LARSH), Polytechnic University of Hauts-de-France (UPHF), F-59313 Valenciennes, France)

  • Ismail Dergaa

    (High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of Manouba, Manouba TN-2010, Tunisia
    High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of El Kef, University of Jendouba, El Kef TN-7100, Tunisia
    These authors contributed equally as third authors.)

  • Halil İbrahim Ceylan

    (Physical Education of Sports Teaching Department, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Türkiye
    These authors contributed equally as third authors.)

  • Valentina Stefanica

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sciences, Physical Education and Informatics, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, R-110040 Pitesti, Romania)

  • Raul-Ioan Muntean

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University “1 Decembrie 1918” of Alba Iulia, R-510009 Alba Iulia, Romania)

  • Fairouz Azaiez

    (Higher Institute of Sport, and Physical Education of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa TN-2100, Tunisia
    Research Laboratory—Education, Motricity, Sport, and Health (EM2S), LR19JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia)

Abstract

(1) Background: Educational systems across the world experienced significant changes during 2020–2022, with potential implications for progress toward Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4: Quality Education), which aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all across European Union member states. Understanding how educational sustainability performance evolved during the pre-pandemic period (2017–2019) and the pandemic-affected period (2020–2022) is essential for developing effective educational policies. (2) Objective: This quantitative comparative study aimed to (i) assess and rank sustainable education developments across EU-27 countries in two periods, Period 1—the pre-pandemic period (2017–2019)—and Period 2—the pandemic-affected period (2020–2022); (ii) identify performance changes between these periods; and (iii) classify countries into performance groups to guide targeted interventions. (3) Methods: Using data from the Eurostat database, we evaluated six key SDG 4 indicators: low-achieving students in reading, mathematics, and science; participation in early childhood education; early school leavers; tertiary educational attainment; adult participation in learning; and adults with basic digital skills. The Multiobjective Optimization based on Ratio Analysis (MOORA) method was used to rank countries and assess sustainable education development. (4) Results: Sweden maintained the highest educational sustainability performance across both periods, while Romania and Bulgaria consistently ranked lowest. Nine countries improved their rankings during the pandemic-affected period, while others maintained stable positions or experienced declines in their rankings. Adult participation in learning showed the greatest variation among the indicators, with top performers, such as Sweden, scoring 0.445 compared to Romania’s 0.051 in Period 2. The proportion of early school leavers decreased from an EU average of 9.0% in Period 1 to 8.3% in Period 2, indicating a positive trend across the study periods. While differences were observed across countries and periods, these should not be interpreted as causally linked to the pandemic alone (5). Conclusions: The performance of educational sustainability varied across EU member states between the two periods, with some countries demonstrating remarkable resilience or improvement, while others declined. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational policies that address specific sustainability weaknesses in individual countries, particularly those in the warning and danger categories. Sweden’s consistent performance offers valuable lessons for educational sustainability, especially during and after major disruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ikram Khatrouch & Hatem Belhouchet & Ismail Dergaa & Halil İbrahim Ceylan & Valentina Stefanica & Raul-Ioan Muntean & Fairouz Azaiez, 2025. "MOORA-Based Assessment of Educational Sustainability Performance in EU-27 Countries: Comparing Pre-Pandemic (2017–2019) and Pandemic-Affected (2020–2022) Periods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7174-:d:1720253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naresh Giangrande & Rehema M. White & May East & Ross Jackson & Tim Clarke & Michel Saloff Coste & Gil Penha-Lopes, 2019. "A Competency Framework to Assess and Activate Education for Sustainable Development: Addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals 4.7 Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Yadegaridehkordi, Elaheh & Hourmand, Mehdi & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Shuib, Liyana & Ahani, Ali & Ibrahim, Othman, 2018. "Influence of big data adoption on manufacturing companies' performance: An integrated DEMATEL-ANFIS approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 199-210.
    3. Jorrit Holst & Mandy Singer‐Brodowski & Antje Brock & Gerhard de Haan, 2024. "Monitoring SDG 4.7: Assessing Education for Sustainable Development in policies, curricula, training of educators and student assessment (input‐indicator)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3908-3923, August.
    4. Gülşah Taşçı & Osman Titrek, 2019. "Evaluation of Lifelong Learning Centers in Higher Education: A Sustainable Leadership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Ewa Roszkowska & Marzena Filipowicz-Chomko, 2021. "Measuring Sustainable Development Using an Extended Hellwig Method: A Case Study of Education," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 299-322, January.
    6. Lu, Ming-Tsang & Hsu, Chao-Che & Liou, James J.H. & Lo, Huai-Wei, 2018. "A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 9-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santiago José Gahn, 2025. "Path dependence in the digital adoption process: a cross-section analysis of Italian firms with a special focus on the Apulia region," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(4), pages 967-987, December.
    2. Ewa Roszkowska & Bartłomiej Jefmański, 2021. "Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Synthetic Measure (I-VIFSM) Based on Hellwig’s Approach in the Analysis of Survey Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Junlong Peng & Jing Zhou & Fanyi Meng & Yan Yu, 2021. "Analysis on the hidden cost of prefabricated buildings based on FISM-BN," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2020. "A new soft computing approach for analyzing the influential relationships of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    6. Chun-Yi Ho & Bi-Huei Tsai & Chiao-Shan Chen & Ming-Tsang Lu, 2021. "Exploring Green Marketing Orientations toward Sustainability the Hospitality Industry in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Ho-Chin Yang, 2021. "Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    8. Sukru Ada, 2020. "Investigation of the Relationships between Individual Innovation and Sustainable Education Beliefs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Gupta, Shivam & Justy, Théo & Kamboj, Shampy & Kumar, Ajay & Kristoffersen, Eivind, 2021. "Big data and firm marketing performance: Findings from knowledge-based view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens & Spas D. Kolev, 2025. "Assessment of the Impact of Renewable Energy Sources and Clean Coal Technologies on the Stability of Energy Systems in Poland and Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Juin-Hao Ho & Gwo-Guang Lee & Ming-Tsang Lu, 2020. "Exploring the Implementation of a Legal AI Bot for Sustainable Development in Legal Advisory Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    12. María Jesús Santos-Villalba & Juan José Leiva Olivencia & Magdalena Ramos Navas-Parejo & María Dolores Benítez-Márquez, 2020. "Higher Education Students’ Assessments towards Gamification and Sustainability: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Mestawot Beyene Tafese & Erika Kopp, 2025. "Embedding Social Sustainability in Education: A Thematic Review of Practices and Trends Across Educational Pathways from a Global Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Gupta, Himanshu & Kunc, Martin, 2021. "Risks associated with the implementation of big data analytics in sustainable supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Ewa Roszkowska & Bartłomiej Jefmański & Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska, 2024. "A synthetic measure for ranking overall satisfaction based on multidimensional ordinal data. The case of airlines on the TripAdvisor website," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 221-242.
    16. Kuo Cheng Chung & Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2022. "Options to Improve Service Quality to Enhance Value Co-Creation for Customers in the Aviation Industry in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    17. John Dermott Alexander Withers & Cecilia Sik-Lanyi, 2021. "Sustaining Inclusive, Quality Education during COVID-19 Lockdowns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Tien-Li Chen & Chin-Chuan Chen & Yen-Ching Chuang & James J. H. Liou, 2020. "A Hybrid MADM Model for Product Design Evaluation and Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Alexander K. Killion & Jessica Ostrow Michel & Jason K. Hawes, 2022. "Toward Identifying Sustainability Leadership Competencies: Insights from Mapping a Graduate Sustainability Education Curriculum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7174-:d:1720253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.