IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6873-d1712361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual Action or Collaborative Scientific Research Institutions? Agricultural Support from Enterprises from the Perspective of Subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Ziyi Zhang

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Yantong Zhong

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Guitao Zhang

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Tianyu Zhai

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Zongru Li

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Shuaicheng Lin

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)

Abstract

Under China’s “Rural Revitalisation” strategy, contract farming faces challenges including farmers’ limited access to advanced technologies and high operational risks for agricultural support enterprises. The collaborative involvement of scientific research institutions offers potential solutions but remains underexplored. This study employs Stackelberg game theory to model a contract farming supply chain under two agricultural assistance modes: enterprise-led (EL) and collaborative assistance with scientific research institutions (CI). We further propose two government subsidy mechanisms: subsidies to enterprises and subsidies to scientific research institutions. The models analyze optimal decisions, supply chain performance, and subsidy efficiency, validated through numerical experiments. Key findings reveal the following: (1) The CI mode enhances agricultural output and farmer revenue but may reduce enterprise profits, deterring collaboration. (2) Government subsidies incentivize enterprise–institution collaboration. Subsidizing scientific research institutions typically improves agricultural productivity and economic benefits more effectively than subsidizing enterprises. (3) Synergistic effects exist among the government subsidy coefficient, cost coefficient of technical assistance, consumer preferences for agricultural quality, and profit-sharing ratio. The latter three parameters significantly influence subsidy model selection. This research provides policy insights for enhancing agricultural assistance efficiency and sustainable contract farming development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziyi Zhang & Yantong Zhong & Guitao Zhang & Tianyu Zhai & Zongru Li & Shuaicheng Lin, 2025. "Individual Action or Collaborative Scientific Research Institutions? Agricultural Support from Enterprises from the Perspective of Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6873-:d:1712361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maertens, Miet & Vande Velde, Katrien, 2017. "Contract-farming in Staple Food Chains: The Case of Rice in Benin," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 73-87.
    2. Niu, Baozhuang & Jin, Delong & Pu, Xujin, 2016. "Coordination of channel members’ efforts and utilities in contract farming operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 869-883.
    3. Hong, Xianpei & He, Yimeng & Zhou, Pin & Chen, Jiguang, 2023. "Demand information sharing in a contract farming supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 560-577.
    4. Miyata, Sachiko & Minot, Nicholas & Hu, Dinghuan, 2009. "Impact of Contract Farming on Income: Linking Small Farmers, Packers, and Supermarkets in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1781-1790, November.
    5. Anh Tru Nguyen & Janet Dzator & Andrew Nadolny, 2015. "Does contract farming improve productivity and income of farmers? A review of theory and evidence," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(6), pages 531-538, Special I.
    6. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Aaron I. Plex Sulá & Valentina de Col & Berea A. Etherton & Yanru Xing & Amogh Agarwal & Lejla Ramić & Enrico Bonaiuti & Michael Friedmann & Claudio Proietti & Graham Thiele & Karen A. Garrett, 2024. "What traits of collaboration networks are associated with project success? The case of two CGIAR agricultural research programs for development," Post-Print hal-05182057, HAL.
    8. Gray, Allan W. & Boehlje, Michael, 2005. "Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs in Producer-Processor Supply Chains," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(4), pages 1-6.
    9. Peng, Hongjun & Pang, Tao, 2019. "Optimal strategies for a three-level contract-farming supply chain with subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 274-286.
    10. Barry K. Goodwin & Ligia A. Vado, 2007. "Public Responses to Agricultural Disasters: Rethinking the Role of Government," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 55(4), pages 399-417, December.
    11. Marc F. Bellemare & Christopher B. Barrett & David R. Just, 2013. "The Welfare Impacts of Commodity Price Volatility: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(4), pages 877-899.
    12. Kopp, Thomas & Dsouza, Alwin & Mishra, Ashok K., 2024. "The relation between contract type and market power: Evidence from a high-value crop in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Plex Sulá, Aaron I. & De Col, Valentina & Etherton, Berea A. & Xing, Yanru & Agarwal, Amogh & Ramić, Lejla & Bonaiuti, Enrico & Friedmann, Michael & Proietti, Claudio & Thiele, Graham & Garrett, Karen, 2024. "What traits of collaboration networks are associated with project success? The case of two CGIAR agricultural research programs for development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Ton, Giel & Vellema, Wytse & Desiere, Sam & Weituschat, Sophia & D'Haese, Marijke, 2018. "Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 46-64.
    15. Ni, Debing & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Xiaowo, 2010. "Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1269-1279, December.
    16. Zhong, Yuanguang & Liu, Ju & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Cao, Bin & Zheng, Xueliang, 2023. "The Role of Ambiguity Aversion in Contract-farming Supply Chains: A Distributionally Robust Approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Fangfang Guo & Tao Zhang & Xiuquan Huang & Yaoguang Zhong, 2023. "Government Subsidy Strategies Considering Greenness on Agricultural Product E-Commerce Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Shang, Hua & Jiang, Li & Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Pan, Xiongfeng & Song, Malin, 2024. "Examining the role of national governance capacity in building the global low-carbon agricultural supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Nasiri, Fuzhan & Zaccour, Georges, 2009. "An exploratory game-theoretic analysis of biomass electricity generation supply chain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4514-4522, November.
    20. Narayanan, Sudha, 2014. "Profits from participation in high value agriculture: Evidence of heterogeneous benefits in contract farming schemes in Southern India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 142-157.
    21. Fraccascia, Luca & Ceccarelli, Gaia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2023. "Green products from industrial symbiosis: Are consumers ready for them?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arouna, Aminou & Michler, Jeffrey D. & Lokossou, Jourdain C., 2021. "Contract farming and rural transformation: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Ruml, Anette & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts in the African small farm sector: Insights from oil palm production in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Khan, Muhammad Fawad & Nakano, Yuko & Kurosaki, Takashi, 2019. "Impact of contract farming on land productivity and income of maize and potato growers in Pakistan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 28-39.
    4. Ranjeet Rajput & Sri Vanamalla Venkataraman, 2022. "A violent market price contract for agribusiness supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1971-1996, August.
    5. Delelegne A. Tefera & Jos Bijman, 2021. "Economics of contracts in African food systems: evidence from the malt barley sector in Ethiopia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Ton, Giel & Vellema, Wytse & Desiere, Sam & Weituschat, Sophia & D'Haese, Marijke, 2018. "Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 46-64.
    7. Bellemare, Marc F. & Bloem, Jeffrey R., 2018. "Does contract farming improve welfare? A review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 259-271.
    8. Viet Hoang, 2021. "Impact of Contract Farming on Farmers’ Income in the Food Value Chain: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study in Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Ola, Oreoluwa & Menapace, Luisa, 2020. "A meta-analysis understanding smallholder entry into high-value markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Viet Hoang & Vinh Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of small farmers' participation in contract farming in developing countries: A study in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 836-853, July.
    11. Jiguang Chen & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2021. "The Impact of Contract Farming on Agricultural Product Supply in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2395-2419, August.
    12. Xing, Guomin & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Cao, Bin, 2025. "Distributionally robust production and pricing for risk-averse contract-farming supply chains with uncertain demand and yield," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Ragasa, Catherine & Lambrecht, Isabel & Kufoalor, Doreen S., 2018. "Limitations of Contract Farming as a Pro-poor Strategy: The Case of Maize Outgrower Schemes in Upper West Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 30-56.
    14. Sakketa, Tekalign Gutu & Nkonde, Chewe & Nkonde, Mwelwa & Herrmann, Raoul, 2024. "Spillovers from Foreign Land-Based Investments in Agriculture: Evidence from a Nucleus-Outgrower Scheme in Zambia," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344286, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    15. Zhong, Yuanguang & Liu, Ju & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Cao, Bin & Zheng, Xueliang, 2023. "The Role of Ambiguity Aversion in Contract-farming Supply Chains: A Distributionally Robust Approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Marwa, Erick & Manda, Julius, 2021. "Do Youth Farmers Benefit from Participating in Contract Farming: Evidence from French Beans Youth Farmers in Arusha, Tanzania," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315907, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Schoneveld, George C. & Weng, Xiaoxue, 2023. "Smallholder value creation in agrifood chains: Value network approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Ming-Feng Hsieh & Yir-Hueih Luh, 2022. "Is Contract Farming with Modern Distributors Partnership for Higher Returns? Analysis of Rice Farm Households in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Schoneveld, George C., 2022. "Transforming food systems through inclusive agribusiness," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. repec:lic:licosd:38016 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Adu-Gyamfi Poku & Regina Birner & Saurabh Gupta, 2018. "Making Contract Farming Arrangements Work in Africa’s Bioeconomy: Evidence from Cassava Outgrower Schemes in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6873-:d:1712361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.