IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6806-d1710692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Assessment of Rural Biogas Production and Use Through a Multi-Criteria Approach: A Case Study in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Hernan Gomez

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
    Research Centre on Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Management in Resource Limited Countries (CeTAmb), University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
    Group on Governance of Climate Change (GGCC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Av. Maristany, 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Nelson Javier Vasquez

    (Environmental Sciences PhD Program, Universidad del Cauca, Calle 5 No. 4-70, 190001 Popayán, Colombia)

  • Kelly Cristina Torres

    (Research Group on Conservation and Use of Biodiversity (BioCon), Instituto Universitario de La Paz-Unipaz, Km 14 vía Bucaramanga, 687031 Barrancabermeja, Colombia)

  • Carlos Mauricio Meza

    (Research Group on Environmental Engineering (GIAS), Instituto Universitario de La Paz-Unipaz, Km 14 vía Bucaramanga, 687031 Barrancabermeja, Colombia)

  • Mentore Vaccari

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
    Research Centre on Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Management in Resource Limited Countries (CeTAmb), University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

Abstract

There is still a need to develop scenarios and models aimed at substituting fuelwood and reducing the use of fossil fuels such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), on which low-income rural households in the Global South often depend. The use of these fuels for cooking and heating in domestic and productive activities poses significant health and environmental risks. This study validated, in three different phases, the sustainability of a model for the production and use of biogas from the treatment of swine-rearing wastewater (WWs) on a community farm: (i) A Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), incorporating environmental, social/health, technical, and economic criteria, identified the main weighted criterion to C8 (use of small-scale technologies and low-cost access), with a score of 0.44 points, as well as the Tubular biodigester (Tb) as the most suitable option for the study area, scoring 8.1 points. (ii) Monitoring of the Tb over 90 days showed an average biogas production of 2.6 m 3 d −1 , with average correlation 0.21 m 3 Biogas kg Biomass −1 . Using the experimental biogas production rate (k = 0.0512 d −1 ), the process was simulated with the BgMod model, achieving an average deviation of only 10.4% during the final production phase. (iii) The quantification of benefits demonstrated significant reductions in firewood use: in Scenario S1 (kitchen energy needs), biogas replaced 83.1% of firewood, while in Scenario S2 (citronella essential oil production), the substitution rate was 24.1%. In both cases, the avoided emissions amounted to 0.52 tons of CO 2eq per month. Finally, this study proposes a synthesised, community-based rural biogas framework designed for replication in regions with similar socio-environmental, technical, and economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Hernan Gomez & Nelson Javier Vasquez & Kelly Cristina Torres & Carlos Mauricio Meza & Mentore Vaccari, 2025. "Sustainability Assessment of Rural Biogas Production and Use Through a Multi-Criteria Approach: A Case Study in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6806-:d:1710692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6806-:d:1710692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.