IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6806-d1710692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Assessment of Rural Biogas Production and Use Through a Multi-Criteria Approach: A Case Study in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Hernan Gomez

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
    Research Centre on Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Management in Resource Limited Countries (CeTAmb), University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
    Group on Governance of Climate Change (GGCC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Av. Maristany, 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Nelson Javier Vasquez

    (Environmental Sciences PhD Program, Universidad del Cauca, Calle 5 No. 4-70, 190001 Popayán, Colombia)

  • Kelly Cristina Torres

    (Research Group on Conservation and Use of Biodiversity (BioCon), Instituto Universitario de La Paz-Unipaz, Km 14 vía Bucaramanga, 687031 Barrancabermeja, Colombia)

  • Carlos Mauricio Meza

    (Research Group on Environmental Engineering (GIAS), Instituto Universitario de La Paz-Unipaz, Km 14 vía Bucaramanga, 687031 Barrancabermeja, Colombia)

  • Mentore Vaccari

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy
    Research Centre on Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Management in Resource Limited Countries (CeTAmb), University of Brescia, Via Branze 43, 25123 Brescia, Italy)

Abstract

There is still a need to develop scenarios and models aimed at substituting fuelwood and reducing the use of fossil fuels such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), on which low-income rural households in the Global South often depend. The use of these fuels for cooking and heating in domestic and productive activities poses significant health and environmental risks. This study validated, in three different phases, the sustainability of a model for the production and use of biogas from the treatment of swine-rearing wastewater (WWs) on a community farm: (i) A Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), incorporating environmental, social/health, technical, and economic criteria, identified the main weighted criterion to C8 (use of small-scale technologies and low-cost access), with a score of 0.44 points, as well as the Tubular biodigester (Tb) as the most suitable option for the study area, scoring 8.1 points. (ii) Monitoring of the Tb over 90 days showed an average biogas production of 2.6 m 3 d −1 , with average correlation 0.21 m 3 Biogas kg Biomass −1 . Using the experimental biogas production rate (k = 0.0512 d −1 ), the process was simulated with the BgMod model, achieving an average deviation of only 10.4% during the final production phase. (iii) The quantification of benefits demonstrated significant reductions in firewood use: in Scenario S1 (kitchen energy needs), biogas replaced 83.1% of firewood, while in Scenario S2 (citronella essential oil production), the substitution rate was 24.1%. In both cases, the avoided emissions amounted to 0.52 tons of CO 2eq per month. Finally, this study proposes a synthesised, community-based rural biogas framework designed for replication in regions with similar socio-environmental, technical, and economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Hernan Gomez & Nelson Javier Vasquez & Kelly Cristina Torres & Carlos Mauricio Meza & Mentore Vaccari, 2025. "Sustainability Assessment of Rural Biogas Production and Use Through a Multi-Criteria Approach: A Case Study in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6806-:d:1710692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nzila, Charles & Dewulf, Jo & Spanjers, Henri & Tuigong, David & Kiriamiti, Henry & van Langenhove, Herman, 2012. "Multi criteria sustainability assessment of biogas production in Kenya," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 496-506.
    2. Karthik Rajendran & Solmaz Aslanzadeh & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2012. "Household Biogas Digesters—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-32, August.
    3. Alvarez, René & Lidén, Gunnar, 2008. "Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 726-734.
    4. Mayerle, Sérgio Fernando & Neiva de Figueiredo, João, 2016. "Designing optimal supply chains for anaerobic bio-digestion/energy generation complexes with distributed small farm feedstock sourcing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 46-54.
    5. Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Chipana, Maria & Cuevas, Carlos & Paco, Gabriel & Serrano, Victor & Zymla, Bernhard & Heising, Klas & Sologuren, Jaime & Gamarra, Alba, 2014. "Low cost tubular digesters as appropriate technology for widespread application: Results and lessons learned from Bolivia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 156-165.
    6. Qiao, Wei & Yan, Xiuyi & Ye, Junhui & Sun, Yifei & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Zhongzhi, 2011. "Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3313-3318.
    7. Gould, Carlos F. & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2018. "LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 395-408.
    8. Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Marco Carnevale Miino & Franco Hernan Gomez & Vincenzo Torretta & Elena Cristina Rada & Sabrina Sorlini, 2020. "Horizontal Flow Constructed Wetland for Greywater Treatment and Reuse: An Experimental Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garfí, Marianna & Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Garwood, Anna & Ferrer, Ivet, 2016. "Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 599-614.
    2. Ferrer-Martí, Laia & Ferrer, Ivet & Sánchez, Elena & Garfí, Marianna, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision support tool for the assessment of household biogas digester programmes in rural areas. A case study in Peru," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 74-83.
    3. Saadabadi, S. Ali & Thallam Thattai, Aditya & Fan, Liyuan & Lindeboom, Ralph E.F. & Spanjers, Henri & Aravind, P.V., 2019. "Solid Oxide Fuel Cells fuelled with biogas: Potential and constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 194-214.
    4. Rupf, Gloria V. & Bahri, Parisa A. & de Boer, Karne & McHenry, Mark P., 2016. "Broadening the potential of biogas in Sub-Saharan Africa: An assessment of feasible technologies and feedstocks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 556-571.
    5. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Yasar, Abdullah & Nazir, Saba & Rasheed, Rizwan & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Nazar, Masooma, 2017. "Economic review of different designs of biogas plants at household level in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 221-229.
    7. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria & Gao, Ruiling & Wang, Xuemei, 2014. "Development and application of prefabricated biogas digesters in developing countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 387-400.
    8. Hamid, R.G. & Blanchard, R.E., 2018. "An assessment of biogas as a domestic energy source in rural Kenya: Developing a sustainable business model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 368-376.
    9. Caleb Wright & Roger Sathre & Shashi Buluswar, 2020. "The global challenge of clean cooking systems," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1219-1240, December.
    10. Jia Boh Tan & Nur Syakina Jamali & Wei En Tan & Hasfalina Che Man & Zurina Zainal Abidin, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion System Using Attached-Biofilm Reactor in the Dairy Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Neshat, Soheil A. & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Najafpour, Ghasem D. & Lahijani, Pooya, 2017. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 308-322.
    12. Alberto Regattieri & Marco Bortolini & Emilio Ferrari & Mauro Gamberi & Francesco Piana, 2018. "Biogas Micro-Production from Human Organic Waste—A Research Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Yazan, Devrim Murat & Fraccascia, Luca & Mes, Martijn & Zijm, Henk, 2018. "Cooperation in manure-based biogas production networks: An agent-based modeling approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 820-833.
    14. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    15. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    17. Ashish Kumar Sedai, Rabindra Nepal, and Tooraj Jamasb, 2022. "Electrification and Socio-Economic Empowerment of Women in India," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    18. Jadwiga Holewa-Rataj & Mateusz Rataj & Anna Król & Ewa Kukulska-Zając, 2025. "Technical and Legal Challenges in the Energetic Utilization of Household-Produced Biogas in the European Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-27, September.
    19. Narlanka, Shaurya Rahul & Balachandra, P., 2025. "A novel system dynamics modelling approach to investigate cooking fuel transitions and policy effectiveness: An application in rural India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    20. Yokoo, Hide-Fumi & Arimura, Toshi H. & Chattopadhyay, Mriduchhanda & Katayama, Hajime, 2023. "Subjective risk belief function in the field: Evidence from cooking fuel choices and health in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6806-:d:1710692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.