IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6693-d1707563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial–Temporal Differences in Land Use Benefits and Obstacles Under Human–Land Contradictions: A Case Study of Henan Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Xi

    (Institute of Urban Construction and Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Yiwei Xu

    (Institute of Urban Construction and Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Shuo Liang

    (Institute of Urban Construction and Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Yuanyuan Chen

    (Institute of Urban Construction and Management, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

Abstract

Against the background of intensifying human–land contradictions, evaluation of land use benefits and identification of obstacles are crucial for sustainable land management and socioeconomic development. Taking Henan Province as an example, this research employed the entropy weight method and TOPSIS model to assess the land use benefits across its cities from 2011 to 2020, a period of rapid land use transformation, analyzed their spatiotemporal evolution, and identified key obstacles via an obstacle degree model. The results showed the following. (1) The social land use benefits consistently exceeded the ecological and economic benefits, with steady improvements observed in both the individual and comprehensive benefits. Spatially, the benefits showed a “one city dominant” pattern, decreasing gradually from the central region to the south, north, east, and west, with this spatial gradient further intensifying over time. (2) Economic factors were the primary obstacles, with significantly higher obstruction degrees than social or ecological factors. The main obstacles were the general budget revenue of government finance per unit land area, domestic garbage removal volume, and total retail sales of social consumer goods per unit land area. (3) The policy implications focus on strengthening regional differentiated development by leveraging Zhengzhou’s core role to boost the land-based economic benefits, integrating social–ecological strengths with agricultural modernization, and promoting “core–periphery linkage” to narrow gaps through targeted industrial and infrastructure strategies. This study could provide region-specific insights for sustainable land management in agricultural provinces undergoing rapid urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Xi & Yiwei Xu & Shuo Liang & Yuanyuan Chen, 2025. "Spatial–Temporal Differences in Land Use Benefits and Obstacles Under Human–Land Contradictions: A Case Study of Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6693-:d:1707563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaodong Yang & Yongxiang Wu & Hang Dang, 2017. "Urban Land Use Efficiency and Coordination in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Rada, Nicholas E., 2013. "ASSESSING BRAZIL’s CERRADO AGRICULTURAL MIRACLE: AN UPDATE," Revista de Economia e Agronegócio / Brazilian Review of Economics and Agribusiness, Federal University of Vicosa, Department of Agricultural Economics, vol. 11(01), pages 1-38.
    4. Wenying Peng & Yue Sun & Yingchen Li & Xiaojuan Yuchi, 2022. "An Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Green Land Use Benefits in China: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Koroso, Nesru H., 2023. "Urban land policy and urban land use efficiency: An analysis based on remote sensing and institutional credibility thesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Rada, Nicholas, 2013. "Assessing Brazil’s Cerrado agricultural miracle," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 146-155.
    7. Shi, Haimeng & Li, Qiao & Zhang, Sun & Chen, Wei & Wang, Yanan & Shen, Yujie, 2024. "Does urban construction land in China achieve sustainable allocation and utilization?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Xinyu Zhuang & Xin Li & Yisong Xu, 2022. "How Can Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of “The Valley of Death”? An Evaluation Index System and Obstacle Degree Analysis of Green Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Jingjing Luo & Shiyan Zhai & Genxin Song & Xinxin He & Hongquan Song & Jing Chen & Huan Liu & Yuke Feng, 2022. "Assessing Inequity in Green Space Exposure toward a “15-Minute City” in Zhengzhou, China: Using Deep Learning and Urban Big Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Jing Zhu & Xuetao Li & Xiaochun Zeng & Kaiyang Zhong & Yifan Xu, 2022. "Cultivated Land-Use Benefit Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Identification: Empirical Evidence from Northern Hubei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Xiuyan Zhao & Changhong Miao, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Simulation of Land Use in Metropolitan Areas: A Case of the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Yan & Zhou, Peng & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2020. "Evaluating urban land use efficiency with interacting criteria: An empirical study of cities in Jiangsu China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bircol, Guilherme Augusto Carminato & Souza, Marcelo Pereira de & Fontes, Aurélio Teodoro & Chiarello, Adriano Garcia & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Planning by the rules: A fair chance for the environment in a land-use conflict area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 103-112.
    2. Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2015. "Mitigation of Large-Scale Biofuel Expansion with Smallholder Conflict: Modelling of Land Use Dynamics using Control Theory for Policy Design to Sustain Food Security and Improve Productivity," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 225669, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Shuangfei Zhao & Wei Zeng & Da Feng, 2024. "Coupling Coordination of Urban Resilience and Urban Land Use Efficiency in Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-33, December.
    4. Rada, Nicholas & Helfand, Steven & Magalhães, Marcelo, 2019. "Agricultural productivity growth in Brazil: Large and small farms excel," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-185.
    5. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia & Katchova, Ani L., 2022. "How Economic Conditions Changed the Number of U.S. Farms, 1960-88: A Replication and Extension of Gale (1990) to Midsize Farms in the U.S. and Abroad," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321202, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    6. De Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis Gustavo & Queiroz Pellegrino, Giampaolo & Moran, Dominic, 2018. "The role of agricultural intensification in Brazil's Nationally Determined Contribution on emissions mitigation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 102-112.
    7. Skidmore, Marin & Sims, Kaitlyn M. & Gibbs, Holly & Rausch, Lisa, 2021. "Health, climate, and agriculture: A case study of childhood cancer in Brazil’s Amazon and Cerrado biomes," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313872, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. de Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis G. & Albertini, Tiago Zanett & Eory, Vera & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & Fernandes, Fernando A. & Moran, Dominic, 2015. "Developing a nationally appropriate mitigation measure from the greenhouse gas GHG abatement potential from livestock production in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 48-55.
    9. Jayne, T.S. & Mason, Nicole M. & Burke, William J. & Ariga, Joshua, "undated". "Agricultural Input Subsidy Programs In Africa: An Assessment Of Recent Evidence," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259509, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    10. Helfand, Steven M. & Magalhaes, Marcelo M. & Rada, Nicholas E., 2015. "Brazil's Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Growth by Farm Size," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 204875, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Luciene Gomes & Silvio J. C. Simões & Eloi Lennon Dalla Nora & Eráclito Rodrigues de Sousa-Neto & Maria Cristina Forti & Jean Pierre H. B. Ometto, 2019. "Agricultural Expansion in the Brazilian Cerrado: Increased Soil and Nutrient Losses and Decreased Agricultural Productivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Wells, Geoff J. & Stuart, Neil & Furley, Peter A. & Ryan, Casey M., 2018. "Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: A case study in Belize," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 70-77.
    13. Huizhen Cui & Linlin Cheng & Yang Zheng & Junqi Wang & Mengyao Zhu & Pengxiang Zhang, 2025. "Analysis of the Dynamic Changes and Driving Mechanism of Land Green Utilization Efficiency in the Context of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Synergistic Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Jayne, Thomas S. & Mason, Nicole M. & Burke, William J. & Ariga, Joshua, 2018. "Review: Taking stock of Africa’s second-generation agricultural input subsidy programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-14.
    15. da Silva Medina, Gabriel & Pokorny, Benno, 2022. "Agro-industrial development: Lessons from Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Souza, Marlon Fernandes de & Tisler, Trevor Ray & Castro, Gustavo Spadotti Amaral & Oliveira, Andréa Leda Ramos de, 2023. "Port regionalization for agricultural commodities: Mapping exporting port hinterlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Ana Claudia Sant'Anna & Ani L. Katchova, 2023. "How economic conditions changed the number of U.S. Farms, 1960–1988: A replication and extension of Gale (1990) to midsize farms in the United States and abroad," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1400-1426, September.
    18. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Buller, Luz Selene & Bergier, Ivan & Ortega, Enrique & Moraes, Anibal & Bayma-Silva, Gustavo & Zanetti, Marilia Ribeiro, 2015. "Soil improvement and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions for integrated crop–livestock systems: Case study assessment in the Pantanal savanna highland, Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 206-219.
    20. Pereira Barsotti, Mariana & de Almeida, Roberto Giolo & Macedo, Manuel Claudio Motta & Gomes, Rodrigo da Costa & Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale & Mazzetto, Andre & Dickhoefer, Uta, 2025. "A pathway for decreasing the water footprint from grazing-based beef production systems in the Tropics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6693-:d:1707563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.