IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6634-d1706002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Replacing Nitrogen Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield in Yunnan’s Red Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao Liu

    (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Wen Ao

    (Yunnan Fuyuan County Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Qujing 655000, China)

  • Shenghang Wu

    (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Qiheng Deng

    (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Hao Ren

    (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Qiang Li

    (College of Biological Resources and Food Engineering, QuJing Normal University, Qujing 655011, China)

  • Hao Li

    (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Peng Zhang

    (Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

Abstract

Red soil regions commonly experience land degradation and low nutrient availability. Excessive fertilizer use in recent years has intensified these challenges, necessitating scientifically informed fertilization strategies to ensure agricultural sustainability. To identify optimal fertilization strategies for maize cultivation in Yunnan’s red soil regions, this study conducted field experiments involving partial substitution of nitrogen fertilizer with organic manure to determine whether this approach improves soil health and boosts maize yield. Four treatments were compared in a randomized complete block design over one growing season: no fertilization (NF), soil testing and formula fertilization (STF), 15% organic fertilizer (swine manure) replacing nitrogen fertilizer (OF15), and 30% organic fertilizer replacing nitrogen fertilizer (OF30). The results indicated that substituting organic fertilizer for nitrogen fertilizer reduced soil acidification while increasing total phosphorus (TP) and available phosphorus (AP), thereby enhancing soil physicochemical properties. Maize grown under OF30 exhibited improved agronomic traits including plant height, stem diameter, ear height, and ear length. Additionally, the partial replacement of synthetic fertilizer with organic fertilizer notably increased maize yield and the weight of 100 grains, but there was no significant difference ( p < 0.05) between OF15 and OF30. Moreover, the OF30 treatment generated the highest economic return of 25,981.73 CNY·ha −1 . Correlation and principal component analyses revealed that substituting organic fertilizer for nitrogen fertilizer notably influenced total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), and yield, with maize yield positively correlated with TP and AP content. This study presents evidence that replacing 30% of nitrogen fertilizer with organic fertilizer is a viable strategy to enhance soil health, maize productivity, and profitability in Yunnan’s red soil regions, providing a crucial scientific foundation to support sustainable agricultural development in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao Liu & Wen Ao & Shenghang Wu & Qiheng Deng & Hao Ren & Qiang Li & Hao Li & Peng Zhang, 2025. "Effects of Replacing Nitrogen Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Maize Yield in Yunnan’s Red Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6634-:d:1706002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6634/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6634/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6634-:d:1706002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.