Author
Listed:
- Katarzyna Wojtowicz
(Department of Production Technology of Reservoir Fluids, Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz 25 A, 31-503 Kraków, Poland)
- Teresa Steliga
(Department of Production Technology of Reservoir Fluids, Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz 25 A, 31-503 Kraków, Poland)
- Tomasz Skalski
(Biotechnology Centre, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 8, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)
- Piotr Kapusta
(Department of Microbiology, Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz 25 A, 31-503 Kraków, Poland)
Abstract
Soil contamination with petroleum hydrocarbons is a serious environmental issue, necessitating the development of effective and environmentally friendly remediation methods that align with the principles of sustainable development. This study investigated the impact of selected biosurfactants on the efficiency of the biodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in contaminated soil. Six biosurfactants—poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA), rhamnolipid, surfactin, a mixture of γ-PGA, rhamnolipids, and surfactin (PSR), as well as two commercial formulations (JBR 425 and JBR 320)—were evaluated in combination with a bacterial consortium. Biodegradation experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions for a 90-day period. The effectiveness of the tested biosurfactants was assessed using respirometric analysis, the chromatographic determination of the residual hydrocarbon content, and toxicity assays. The results showed that the application of a bacterial consortium enriched with a mixture of biosurfactants PSR (a biosurfactant concentration in the inoculating mixture: 5 g/dm 3 ) was the most effective approach, resulting in an oxygen uptake of 5164.8 mgO 2 /dm 3 after 90 days, with TPH and PAH degradation rates of 77.3% and 70.32%, respectively. Phytotoxicity values decreased significantly, with TU values ranging from 6.32 to 4.62 (growth inhibition) and 3.77 to 4.13 (germination). Toxicity also decreased in the ostracodtoxkit test (TU = 4.35) and the Microtox SPT test (TU = 4.91). Among the tested biosurfactants, surfactin showed the least improvement in its bioremediation efficiency. Under the same concentration as in the PSR mixture, the oxygen uptake was 3446.7 mgO 2 /dm 3 , with TPH and PAH degradation rates of 60.64% and 52.64%, respectively. In the system inoculated with the bacterial consortium alone (without biosurfactants), the biodegradation efficiency reached 44.35% for TPH and 36.97% for PAHs. The results demonstrate that biosurfactants can significantly enhance the biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil, supporting their potential application in sustainable bioremediation strategies.
Suggested Citation
Katarzyna Wojtowicz & Teresa Steliga & Tomasz Skalski & Piotr Kapusta, 2025.
"Influence of Biosurfactants on the Efficiency of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Biodegradation in Soil,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6520-:d:1703051
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Sima Abdoli & Behnam Asgari Lajayer & Sepideh Bagheri Novair & Gordon W. Price, 2025.
"Unlocking the Potential of Biosurfactants in Agriculture: Novel Applications and Future Directions,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, February.
- Carolina Rossini Simões & Matheus Willian Pereira da Silva & Rodrigo Fernandes Magalhães de Souza & Ronald Roja Hacha & Antônio Gutierrez Merma & Maurício Leonardo Torem & Flávia Paulucci Cianga Silva, 2024.
"Biosurfactants: An Overview of Their Properties, Production, and Application in Mineral Flotation,"
Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6520-:d:1703051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.