Author
Listed:
- Noppadol Sangiamsak
(Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)
- Nopanom Kaewhanam
(Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)
- Meesakthana Puapitthayathorn
(Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)
- Seksan Numsong
(Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)
- Kowit Suwannahong
(Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Bang Saen 20131, Thailand)
- Sukanya Hongthong
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Arts and Science, Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University, Nafai 36000, Thailand)
- Torpong Kreetachat
(School of Energy and Environment, University of Phayao, Amphur Muang 56000, Thailand)
- Sompop Sanongraj
(Faculty of Engineering, Ubonratchathani University, Ubonratchathani 45130, Thailand)
- Surachai Wongcharee
(Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand)
Abstract
A major breakthrough in environmentally friendly building materials is the development of sustainable unfired clay bricks including alumina waste produced during liquid nitrogen generation. Though used extensively, conventional fired clay bricks require energy-intensive manufacturing techniques that produce significant amounts of CO 2 and aggravate environmental damage. By removing the need for high-temperature firing and allowing for the valorization of industrial byproducts including alumina waste and lateritic soil, unfired clay bricks offer a reasonable low-carbon alternative. High silica and alumina contents define the alumina waste, which shows pozzolanic reactivity, thus improving the physicomechanical performance of the bricks. With alumina waste substituting 0–8.57% of the cement content, seven different formulations showed improvements in compressive strength, reduced water absorption, and optimal thermal conductivity. Especially, the mechanical performance was much enhanced with alumina waste inclusion up to 30%, without sacrificing thermal insulation capacity or moisture resistance. Further supporting the environmental and financial sustainability of the suggested brick compositions is the economic viability of using industrial waste and regionally derived soils. A comparative analysis of the conventional fired bricks shows that the unfired substitutes have a much lower environmental impact and show better mechanical properties, including greater compressive strength and modulus of rupture. These results support the more general goals of circular economy systems and low-carbon urban development by highlighting the feasibility of including alumina waste and lateritic soil into sustainable building materials. Using such waste-derived inputs in building fits world initiatives to lower resource consumption, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and build strong infrastructure systems.
Suggested Citation
Noppadol Sangiamsak & Nopanom Kaewhanam & Meesakthana Puapitthayathorn & Seksan Numsong & Kowit Suwannahong & Sukanya Hongthong & Torpong Kreetachat & Sompop Sanongraj & Surachai Wongcharee, 2025.
"Development of Unfired Clay Bricks with Alumina Waste from Liquid Nitrogen Production: A Sustainable Alternative for Construction Materials,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-29, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6424-:d:1701037
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Iqbal Kaur & Kulvinder Singh & Eduard-Marius Craciun, 2023.
"New Modified Couple Stress Theory of Thermoelasticity with Hyperbolic Two Temperature,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
- Barbara Sadowska-Buraczewska & Małgorzata Grzegorczyk-Frańczak, 2021.
"Sustainable Recycling of High-Strength Concrete as an Alternative to Natural Aggregates in Building Structures,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6424-:d:1701037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.