IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6057-d1693065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on Impact Responses of Geofoam Reinforced Sand Cushion for Rockfall Hazard Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Meng

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Qinghui Jiang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Huajian Gao

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Hanlin Feng

    (College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

Abstract

In rockfall hazard mitigation, geofoam has been used in the cushion layer to improve the sustainability of the rockfall gallery, such as impact resistance enhancement and dead load reduction. Impact tests were conducted to study the effect of geofoam type, thickness, and impact energy on the impact responses of the sand cushion layer. The test results showed that placing geofoam in the sand cushion can reduce the peak impact force of the rockfall and the peak acceleration of the gallery slab by up to 80%. While the peak impact stress at the cushion layer bottom can also be reduced by geofoam under low impact energy, thicker geofoam layers (e.g., 4 and 6 cm) increased peak impact stress when the rockfall had high impact energy. Placing geofoam at the bottom of the cushion to replace one third of the sand cushion thickness can enhance the impact resistance of the cushion layer. Under low impact energy, expandable polyethylene (EPE) foam resulted in lower impact force on the rockfall, reduced impact stress within the sand cushion, and diminished vibration of the gallery slab compared with polystyrene (EPS) foam with a constant thickness. However, EPS foam is suitable for use in sand cushions of rockfall galleries subjected to high-energy rock impacts. Moreover, EPE foam exhibits superior resilience, resulting in less damage compared to EPS foam.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Meng & Qinghui Jiang & Huajian Gao & Hanlin Feng, 2025. "Experimental Study on Impact Responses of Geofoam Reinforced Sand Cushion for Rockfall Hazard Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6057-:d:1693065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Zhang & Jierui Feng & Longhuan Du & Peng Zhao & Jiao Peng & Chen Yang & Hua Fan & Liangpu Li, 2023. "Numerical Investigation of the Dynamic Response of a Sand Cushion with Multiple Rockfall Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Weigang Shen & Tao Zhao & Feng Dai, 2021. "Influence of particle size on the buffering efficiency of soil cushion layer against rockfall impact," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1469-1488, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangli Zhou & Haiying Fu & Mingzhe Zhou & Yanyan Zhao & Zhihao Wang, 2025. "Multiple rockfall impacts on a sand cushion composed of non-spherical particles using three-dimensional DEM," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(7), pages 8631-8653, April.
    2. Bin Gong & Xiang Yu & Yongjun Zhang & Chunyan Bao & Chun’an Tang, 2025. "Investigation into the rockfall impact process of a quarry landfill slope under highway expansion," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 5669-5695, March.
    3. Shao-Zhen Duan & Guang-Li Li & Xin Yang & Xin-Rong Wei, 2024. "Predicting the velocity and trajectory of a rockfall after collision considering the effects of slope properties," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(2), pages 2057-2072, January.
    4. Dong Su & Runqi Zhang & Hao Xiong & Debo Zhao, 2023. "Dynamic analysis of rockfall impact on a protective structure via FEM-DEM coupling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(3), pages 1771-1797, December.
    5. Yu Zhang & Jierui Feng & Longhuan Du & Peng Zhao & Jiao Peng & Chen Yang & Hua Fan & Liangpu Li, 2023. "Numerical Investigation of the Dynamic Response of a Sand Cushion with Multiple Rockfall Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6057-:d:1693065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.