IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5700-d1683734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Assessment and Product Life Cycle Analysis of Different Jersey Fabrics Using Conventional, Post-Industrial, and Post-Consumer Recycled Cotton Fibers

Author

Listed:
  • Rute Santos

    (Valérius Têxteis S.A, 4750-078 Barcelos, Portugal
    RDD Textiles Lda., 4750-803 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Maria José Abreu

    (2C2T-Center for Textile Science and Technology, Textile Engineering Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

The textile industry generates a large amount of waste, producing approximately 92 million tons of textile waste annually, much of which ends up in landfills. This alarming figure highlights the need for an urgent waste management strategy. Mechanical recycling has emerged and is being explored as an alternative to manage this waste, enabling the transformation of discarded textiles into recycled fibers for the production of new materials. In this study, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted for five different knitted fabrics, considering the origin of their cotton content: from virgin cotton to post-industrial and post-consumer recycled cotton fibers, to evaluate the environmental impact of each fabric. The analysis revealed that the spinning, dyeing, and finishing processes were the primary contributors across multiple environmental impact categories. Specifically, for the Water Scarcity Potential (WSP) indicator, these processes accounted for 96% of the total impact. In terms of raw material contributions to water scarcity, organic cotton fiber had the highest impact at 54%, followed by post-consumer recycled cotton at 24% and post-industrial recycled cotton at 22%. Variations in environmental contributions were also observed for the remaining impact categories. A key challenge in this study is the lack of a dedicated impact category in LCA that directly quantifies the environmental benefits of using recycled materials. Specifically, current LCA methodologies do not have a standardized metric to measure the impact reduction achieved by substituting virgin fibers with recycled ones, even though comparisons indicate reduced impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rute Santos & Maria José Abreu, 2025. "Impact Assessment and Product Life Cycle Analysis of Different Jersey Fabrics Using Conventional, Post-Industrial, and Post-Consumer Recycled Cotton Fibers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5700-:d:1683734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5700-:d:1683734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.