IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5700-d1683734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Assessment and Product Life Cycle Analysis of Different Jersey Fabrics Using Conventional, Post-Industrial, and Post-Consumer Recycled Cotton Fibers

Author

Listed:
  • Rute Santos

    (Valérius Têxteis S.A, 4750-078 Barcelos, Portugal
    RDD Textiles Lda., 4750-803 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Maria José Abreu

    (2C2T-Center for Textile Science and Technology, Textile Engineering Department, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

The textile industry generates a large amount of waste, producing approximately 92 million tons of textile waste annually, much of which ends up in landfills. This alarming figure highlights the need for an urgent waste management strategy. Mechanical recycling has emerged and is being explored as an alternative to manage this waste, enabling the transformation of discarded textiles into recycled fibers for the production of new materials. In this study, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted for five different knitted fabrics, considering the origin of their cotton content: from virgin cotton to post-industrial and post-consumer recycled cotton fibers, to evaluate the environmental impact of each fabric. The analysis revealed that the spinning, dyeing, and finishing processes were the primary contributors across multiple environmental impact categories. Specifically, for the Water Scarcity Potential (WSP) indicator, these processes accounted for 96% of the total impact. In terms of raw material contributions to water scarcity, organic cotton fiber had the highest impact at 54%, followed by post-consumer recycled cotton at 24% and post-industrial recycled cotton at 22%. Variations in environmental contributions were also observed for the remaining impact categories. A key challenge in this study is the lack of a dedicated impact category in LCA that directly quantifies the environmental benefits of using recycled materials. Specifically, current LCA methodologies do not have a standardized metric to measure the impact reduction achieved by substituting virgin fibers with recycled ones, even though comparisons indicate reduced impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rute Santos & Maria José Abreu, 2025. "Impact Assessment and Product Life Cycle Analysis of Different Jersey Fabrics Using Conventional, Post-Industrial, and Post-Consumer Recycled Cotton Fibers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5700-:d:1683734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catarina Carvalho & Carla Joana Silva & Maria José Abreu, 2025. "Circular Economy: Literature Review on the Implementation of the Digital Product Passport (DPP) in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. & de la Guardia, M., 2017. "Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 107-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2022. "Human Health and Ecosystem Quality Benefits with Life Cycle Assessment Due to Fungicides Elimination in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Gilbert Moyen Massa & Vasiliki-Maria Archodoulaki, 2024. "An Imported Environmental Crisis: Plastic Mismanagement in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Raghu Raman & Payel Das & Rimjhim Aggarwal & Rajesh Buch & Balasubramaniam Palanisamy & Tripti Basant & Urvashi Baid & Pozhamkandath Karthiayani Viswanathan & Nava Subramaniam & Prema Nedungadi, 2025. "Circular Economy Transitions in Textile, Apparel, and Fashion: AI-Based Topic Modeling and Sustainable Development Goals Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-36, June.
    4. Tuğçe Demirdelen & İnayet Özge Aksu & Kübra Yilmaz & Duygu Durdu Koç & Miray Arikan & Arif Şener, 2023. "Investigation of the Carbon Footprint of the Textile Industry: PES- and PP-Based Products with Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Shuang Chen & Fangli Chen & Lisha Zhu & Qizheng Li & Xiaopeng Wang & Laili Wang, 2023. "A Spatial Water Footprint Assessment of Recycled Cotton T-Shirts: Case of Local Impacts in Selected China Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Huantian Cao & Kelly Cobb & Michelle Yatvitskiy & Megan Wolfe & Hongqing Shen, 2022. "Textile and Product Development from End-of-Use Cotton Apparel: A Study to Reclaim Value from Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Gustav Sandin & Matilda Lidfeldt & Maja Nellström, 2025. "Exploring the Environmental Impact of Textile Recycling in Europe: A Consequential Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Rhyllary Coelho e Silva & Ricardo de Siqueira Camargo & Gabriel da Silva Medina & Mariana Gatti & Eva Sevigne-Itoiz & Lorenzo Di Lucia & Onesmus N. Mwabonje, 2022. "Fashion Market Niches for Organic Agroforestry Cotton: Market Potential for Promoting Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Maryam Hina & Chetna Chauhan & Rajat Sharma & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "Circular economy business models as pillars of sustainability: Where are we now, and where are we heading?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6182-6209, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5700-:d:1683734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.