IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5697-d1683717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Ifeoma Ukonze

    (School of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

  • Antoni Moore

    (School of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

  • Greg Leonard

    (School of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

  • Ben Daniel

    (Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology (CTLT), University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada)

Abstract

Green Infrastructure (GI) has increasingly been recognised as a crucial strategy for enhancing urban resilience, particularly in urban transportation systems facing the challenges of climate change. Although several conceptual frameworks for GI planning have been proposed, empirical studies examining their application in urban transport planning contexts remain limited. This study aims to validate a recently developed GI conceptual framework by evaluating its applicability in urban transportation systems. A structured questionnaire was administered to 94 participants in Aotearoa New Zealand comprising urban planners, engineers, architects, policymakers, and academics involved in transportation and sustainability planning with special focus on GI. The framework was assessed across key dimensions including the perceived benefits of GI in transportation, stakeholder and collaborative practices barriers to implementation, and indicators of perceived effectiveness. The results confirm that the stakeholders’ perceptions of GI are significantly aligned with the dimensions of the conceptual framework, reinforcing its validity in assessing GI effectiveness. Key findings highlight a disconnect between stakeholders’ general familiarity with GI and their understanding of its multifunctional benefits beyond stormwater management. Also, the prevalence of multidisciplinary collaboration suggests that additional interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches are required for more holistic GI planning. This study recommends that the conceptual framework be considered for city adaptation to GI integration, and to do so effectively, these knowledge and cooperation gaps must be addressed

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Ifeoma Ukonze & Antoni Moore & Greg Leonard & Ben Daniel, 2025. "Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5697-:d:1683717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5697-:d:1683717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.