Author
Listed:
- Girija Ramakrishna
(Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India)
- Balachandra Patil
(Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India)
Abstract
Nature-based systems predominantly treat faecal sludge in developing regions due to their cost-effectiveness and operational simplicity. These systems, including solid–liquid separation, anaerobic digestion, dewatering, phytofiltration, and composting produce, treated sludge with variable characteristics. However, application-specific characterisation of treated sludge from these systems remains limited, hindering evidence-based agricultural application. This study investigated thirty treated faecal sludge samples from unplanted drying beds, planted drying beds, and co-composting, with a focus on their soil application potential. Nonparametric statistical analysis revealed that treatment processes significantly influenced the key properties, including electrical conductivity, total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and potassium content. The co-compost yielded comparatively higher conductivity (4.9 dS/m) and potassium levels (1.09%) but lower total nitrogen (2.15%) and organic carbon contents (28%). Additionally, co-composted sludge exhibited a balanced nutrient profile with a wide range of micronutrients and high variability. Despite this variability, all samples met the Indian compost quality guidelines for heavy metals. The findings underscore the importance of treatment-specific characterisation to inform appropriate soil application rates and ensure safe use. This study contributes to the development of quality criteria and guidelines for use of faecal sludge in agriculture, particularly in regions such as India, where no regulatory framework currently exists for faecal sludge application.
Suggested Citation
Girija Ramakrishna & Balachandra Patil, 2025.
"Characterisation of Faecal Sludge from Different Nature-Based Treatment Processes for Agricultural Application,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5683-:d:1683442
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5683-:d:1683442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.