Author
Listed:
- Yongchao Zou
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)
- Jinlong Xiao
(Changjiang Waterway Institution of Planning and Design, Wuhan 430040, China)
- Hao Zhang
(School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)
- Yanyi Chen
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)
- Yao Liu
(School of Business Administration, Wuhan Business University, Wuhan 430056, China)
- Bozhong Zhou
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)
- Yunpeng Li
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)
Abstract
Serving as critical sustainable transportation infrastructure, inland waterways provide dual socioeconomic and ecological value by (1) facilitating high-efficiency freight logistics through cost-effective bulk cargo transport while stimulating regional economic growth, and (2) delivering essential ecosystem services including flood regulation, water resource preservation, and biodiversity conservation. This study establishes a stakeholder-centered risk assessment framework to enhance decision-making of waterway engineering projects and promote the sustainable development of Inland Waterway Transport. We propose a three-layer approach: (1) identifying key stakeholders in the decision-making stage of waterway engineering projects through multi-dimensional criteria; (2) listing and classifying decision-making risks from the perspectives of managers, users, and other stakeholders; (3) applying the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to prioritize key risks and proposing a risk assessment model based on fuzzy reasoning theory to evaluate decision-making risks under uncertain conditions. This framework was applied to the Yangtze River Trunk Line Wuhan–Anqing Waterway Regulation Project. The results show that the risk ranking is managers, users, and other stakeholders, among which the risk of engineering freight demand is particularly prominent. This suggests that we need to pay attention to optimizing material transportation and operational organization, promote the development of large-scale ships, and realize the diversification of ship types and transportation organizations. This study combines fuzzy reasoning with stakeholder theory, providing a replicable tool for the Waterway Management Authority to address the complex sustainability challenges in global waterway development projects.
Suggested Citation
Yongchao Zou & Jinlong Xiao & Hao Zhang & Yanyi Chen & Yao Liu & Bozhong Zhou & Yunpeng Li, 2025.
"Multi-Stakeholder Risk Assessment of a Waterway Engineering Project During the Decision-Making Stage from the Perspective of Sustainability,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-33, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5372-:d:1676309
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5372-:d:1676309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.