IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4824-d1663280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Light Pollution (ELP) Scale as a Measure of Light Pollution Impact on Protected Areas: Case Study of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Ściężor

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Kraków, Poland
    Light Pollution Think Tank, 30-504 Kraków, Poland
    Polish Society of Amateur Astronomers, 31-055 Kraków, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Iwanicki

    (Light Pollution Think Tank, 30-504 Kraków, Poland
    Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 20-718 Lublin, Poland)

  • Mieczysław Kunz

    (Light Pollution Think Tank, 30-504 Kraków, Poland
    Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Andrzej Z. Kotarba

    (Light Pollution Think Tank, 30-504 Kraków, Poland
    Space Research Centre of Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN), 00-716 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Karolina Skorb

    (Doctoral School of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-512 Kraków, Poland)

  • Przemysław Tabaka

    (Light Pollution Think Tank, 30-504 Kraków, Poland
    Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

Light pollution is a rapidly growing environmental challenge, with the global brightness of the night sky increasing by an average of 9.6% per year. This study assessed the ecological impact of artificial light at night (ALAN) on protected areas in Poland, including all 23 national and 125 landscape parks, from 2012 to 2023. Based on VIIRS satellite radiance data and modelled sky surface brightness (Sa), we developed and applied the Ecological Light Pollution (ELP) scale, which classifies areas into four classes of ecological impact: strong (ELP-A), pronounced (ELP-B), noticeable (ELP-C), and weak or none (ELP-D). The analysis revealed that 38.5% of protected areas are affected by artificial skyglow at levels classified as ELP-B or ELP-C. Under cloudy conditions, which intensify light pollution effects, 22% of national parks and 41.8% of landscape parks fell into these classes. Notably, Wielkopolski National Park exhibited the most pronounced impact (ELP-B) even under clear skies, primarily due to its proximity to the Poznań metropolitan area. In contrast, Bieszczadzki and Białowieski National Parks recorded near-natural darkness (ELP-D). These light pollution effects can disrupt nocturnal species’ behaviour, reduce biodiversity, and degrade opportunities for dark-sky tourism. The findings emphasise the need for targeted mitigation, including stricter outdoor lighting regulations, formal dark-sky protection zones, and public education to preserve protected areas’ ecological integrity and tourism potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Ściężor & Grzegorz Iwanicki & Mieczysław Kunz & Andrzej Z. Kotarba & Karolina Skorb & Przemysław Tabaka, 2025. "Ecological Light Pollution (ELP) Scale as a Measure of Light Pollution Impact on Protected Areas: Case Study of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4824-:d:1663280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4824-:d:1663280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.