IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4646-d1658912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Scale Sponge Capacity Trading and SLSQP for Stormwater Management Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • An-Kang Liu

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Qing Xu

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Wen-Jin Zhu

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Yang Zhang

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • De-Long Huang

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Qing-Hai Xie

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Chun-Bo Jiang

    (School of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Hai-Ruo Wang

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

Abstract

Low-impact development (LID) facilities serve as a fundamental approach in urban stormwater management. However, significant variations in land use among different plots lead to discrepancies in runoff reduction demands, frequently leading to either the over- or under-implementation of LID infrastructure. To address this issue, we propose a cost-effective optimization framework grounded in the concept of “Capacity Trading (CT)”. The study area was partitioned into multi-scale grids (CT-100, CT-200, CT-500, and CT-1000) to systematically investigate runoff redistribution across heterogeneous land parcels. Integrated with the Sequential Least Squares Programming (SLSQP) optimization algorithm, LID facilities are allocated according to demand under two independent constraint conditions: runoff coefficient ( φ ≤ 0.49) and runoff control rate ( η ≥ 70%). A quantitative analysis was conducted to evaluate the construction cost and reduction effectiveness across different trading scales. The key findings include the following: (1) At a constant return period, increasing the trading scale significantly reduces the demand for LID facility construction. Expanding trading scales from CT-100 to CT-1000 reduces LID area requirements by 28.33–142.86 ha under the φ -constraint and 25.5–197.19 ha under the η -constraint. (2) Systematic evaluations revealed that CT-500 optimized cost-effectiveness by balancing infrastructure investments and hydrological performance. This scale allows for coordinated construction, avoiding the high costs associated with small-scale trading (CT-100 and CT-200) while mitigating the diminishing returns observed in large-scale trading (CT-1000). This study provides a refined and efficient solution for urban stormwater management, overcoming the limitations of traditional approaches and demonstrating significant practical value.

Suggested Citation

  • An-Kang Liu & Qing Xu & Wen-Jin Zhu & Yang Zhang & De-Long Huang & Qing-Hai Xie & Chun-Bo Jiang & Hai-Ruo Wang, 2025. "Multi-Scale Sponge Capacity Trading and SLSQP for Stormwater Management Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4646-:d:1658912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4646-:d:1658912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.