Author
Listed:
- Magdalena Wijata
(Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, Building no. 37, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)
- Irena Suwara
(Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, Building no. 37, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)
- Marcin Studnicki
(Department of Biometry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, Building no. 37, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)
- Aneta Perzanowska
(Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, Building no. 37, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)
- Abu Zar Ghafoor
(Department of Biometry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, Building no. 37, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)
- Renata Leszczyńska
(Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska St. 159, Building no. 37, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term crop rotation and fertilization treatments on the yield and yield component stability of spring barley and winter wheat on the basis of selected data over 30 years. The stability was measured using statistical methods (the Shukla stability index and linear mixed models). The long-term field experiments established in 1955 were conducted in central Poland (Chylice near Warsaw, 52°06′ N, 20°33′ E) and consisted of two crop rotations with the same fertilization regime. The first field experiment (A—NOR) is typical of the Norfolk rotation and consists of the following four crops: 1. sugar beet, 2. spring barley with undersown red clover, 3. red clover, and 4. winter wheat, while the second field experiment (B—NONleg) contains a sequence of crops without legumes: 1. sugar beet, 2. spring barley, 3. winter rapeseed, and 4. winter wheat. The following fertilization regimes are used in both experiments: a control without any fertilization (O), mineral fertilization (NPK), farmyard manure (FM), and mixed mineral and organic fertilization (½ NPK + ½ FM). The average yields of winter wheat and spring barley (in t*ha −1 ) were 4.34 (a max of 5.48 in NONleg_NPK) and 4.27 (a max of 5.67 in NONleg_NPK) in the NONleg rotation treatment and 5.39 (a max of 6.12 in NOR_NPK) and 4.28 (a max of 5.22 in NOR_½ NPK + ½ FM), respectively, in the legume-based NOR rotation treatment. In the legume-free rotation treatment, the highest yield stability was found in the treatments fertilized only with manure (NONleg_FM) and in a mixed manner (NONleg_½NPK + ½FM), while in the Norfolk rotation treatment, the yield stability was the highest in the treatments with mixed fertilization (NOR_½NPK+½FM) and the treatments in which only mineral fertilizers were used (NOR_NPK).
Suggested Citation
Magdalena Wijata & Irena Suwara & Marcin Studnicki & Aneta Perzanowska & Abu Zar Ghafoor & Renata Leszczyńska, 2025.
"Yield and Yield Components Stability of Winter Wheat and Spring Barley in Long-Term Experiment in Poland,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-15, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4577-:d:1657672
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4577-:d:1657672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.