IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4546-d1657066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Microbiological Sampling in Civil Settings: Comparative LCA Analysis of Green Cleaning Techniques vs. Traditional Methods in Accordance with New Italian CAM Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Fontana

    (Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
    These authors contribute equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Luciano Vogli

    (Punto 3 Srl S.B., 44122 Ferrara, Italy
    These authors contribute equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Mattia Buratto

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Anna Caproni

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Chiara Nordi

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Mariangela Pappadà

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Martina Facchini

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Cesare Buffone

    (Punto 3 Srl S.B., 44122 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Beatrice Bandera

    (Punto 3 Srl S.B., 44122 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Peggy Marconi

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
    LTTA Laboratory for Advanced Therapies, Technopole of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
    CIB—Interuniversity Centre for Biotechnologies, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

Abstract

This research conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) to examine both the ecological footprint and microbiological performance of eco-friendly and traditional cleaning methods in non-clinical environments. Conducted in accordance with the updated Minimum Environmental Criteria (CAMs), the research follows the principles and framework established by UNI EN ISO 14040 and 14044. Additionally, the assessment of carbon footprint (kg CO 2 e) adheres to ISO 14067:2018, with guidance from Product Category Rules (PCR 2011:03 v3.0.1). Our findings demonstrate that the Green Protocol implemented by Dussmann Service reduces the carbon footprint of cleaning activities by 20.0% compared to the traditional protocol, equating to an annual reduction of 156 kg CO 2 at the pilot site. Laboratory analyses confirm that the Green Protocol maintains hygiene standards equivalent to conventional methods, ensuring adequate microbiological quality while significantly lowering environmental impact. The study highlights the feasibility of integrating eco-friendly cleaning practices without compromising effectiveness. Future research should explore the scalability, cost-efficiency, and long-term benefits of this approach. This assessment provides a scientifically validated foundation for adopting sustainable cleaning methodologies in professional settings, supporting the transition towards environmentally responsible facility management.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Fontana & Luciano Vogli & Mattia Buratto & Anna Caproni & Chiara Nordi & Mariangela Pappadà & Martina Facchini & Cesare Buffone & Beatrice Bandera & Peggy Marconi, 2025. "Environmental Microbiological Sampling in Civil Settings: Comparative LCA Analysis of Green Cleaning Techniques vs. Traditional Methods in Accordance with New Italian CAM Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4546-:d:1657066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4546-:d:1657066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.