IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4455-d1655364.html

Environmental and Economic Assessment of Desktop vs. Laptop Computers: A Life Cycle Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Ferreira

    (IT Department, Technology and Management School, Polytechnic University of Viseu, Av. Cor. José Maria Vale de Andrade, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Idalina Domingos

    (Centre for Natural Resources, Environment, and Society-CERNAS-IPV, Technology and Management School, Polytechnic University of Viseu, Av. Cor. José Maria Vale de Andrade, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Lenise Santos

    (Technology and Management School, Polytechnic University of Viseu, Av. Cor. José Maria Vale de Andrade, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • Anna Barreto

    (Technology and Management School, Polytechnic University of Viseu, Av. Cor. José Maria Vale de Andrade, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

  • José Ferreira

    (Centre for Natural Resources, Environment, and Society-CERNAS-IPV, Technology and Management School, Polytechnic University of Viseu, Av. Cor. José Maria Vale de Andrade, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

Abstract

This study evaluates and compares the environmental and economic implications of desktop and laptop computer systems throughout their life cycles using screening life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The functional unit was defined as the use of one computer system for fundamental home and small-business productivity tasks for over four years. The analysis considered the production, use, and end-of-life phases. The results showed the desktop system had a higher overall carbon footprint (679.1 kg CO 2eq ) compared to the laptop (286.1 kg CO 2eq ). For both systems, manufacturing contributed the largest share of the emissions, followed by use. Desktops exhibited significantly higher use phase emissions, due to greater energy consumption. Life cycle cost analysis revealed that laptops had slightly lower total costs (EUR 593.88) than desktops (EUR 608.40) over the 4-year period, despite higher initial investment costs. Sensitivity analysis examining different geographical scenarios highlighted the importance of considering regional factors in the LCA. Manufacturer-provided data generally showed lower carbon footprint values than the modeled scenarios. This study emphasizes the need for updated life cycle inventory data and energy efficiency improvements to reduce the environmental impacts of computer systems. Overall, laptops demonstrated environmental and economic advantages over desktops in the defined usage cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Ferreira & Idalina Domingos & Lenise Santos & Anna Barreto & José Ferreira, 2025. "Environmental and Economic Assessment of Desktop vs. Laptop Computers: A Life Cycle Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4455-:d:1655364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Schaubroeck, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of product systems in dire straits due to ISO 14040–14044 standards: Five key issues and solutions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1600-1604, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irene Mazzei & Ruth Saint & Alistair Kay & Francesco Pomponi, 2024. "Embodied carbon quantification of luminaires using life cycle assessment and CIBSE TM65 methodologies: A comparison case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 59-73, February.
    2. Marco Ruggeri & Giuliana Vinci & Roberto Ruggieri & Marco Savastano, 2025. "Facing the Risk of Greenwashing in the ESG Report of Global Companies: The Importance of Life Cycle Thinking," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 4216-4234, May.
    3. Yi Qian & Tharaka Gunawardena & Priyan Mendis & Lu Aye, 2025. "Carbon Footprint Variability in Engineered Wood Products for Timber Buildings: A Systematic Review of Carbon Accounting Methodologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-34, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4455-:d:1655364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.