IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4412-d1654407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Formal and Informal Institutional Elements on Land Mobility Within Rural Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Ilias Makris

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Peloponnese, 24100 Kalamata, Greece)

  • Sotiris Apostolopoulos

    (Department of Economics and Business, Neapolis University Pafos, Pafos 8042, Cyprus)

  • Vasileios Giannopoulos

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Peloponnese, 24100 Kalamata, Greece)

  • Panos Dimitrakopoulos

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Peloponnese, 24100 Kalamata, Greece)

  • Panagiotis Charalampakis

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

Land mobility, particularly in the agricultural sector, is a critical factor for rural development and the maintenance of the supply chain. In the EU, the dominant form of agricultural land mobility is succession. This study examines the impact of formal and informal institutional factors on land mobility and the development of the agricultural sector in Greece, emphasizing their role in shaping succession and land mobility processes. This research introduces an innovative approach by analyzing both formal (legislation, EU policies, taxation) and informal (cultural ties, family traditions) institutional factors that influence land mobility. Within this framework, this study explores the attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors of farmers, acknowledging that the institutional environment—shaped by both official regulations and informal norms, often expressed by the family head—may influence younger family members to adopt similar behaviors and practices. It also highlights the impact of ineffective and underdeveloped formal and informal institutions, providing policymakers and young people seeking to engage in agriculture with a valuable guide. The methodology is based on qualitative research, using semi-structured interviews with 21 members of farming families to capture views, perceptions, and experiences related to land mobility. The findings highlight several major barriers, including fragmented land ownership, emotional attachment to inherited land, bureaucratic obstacles, and high tax burdens. At the same time, shifting attitudes among younger generations are evident, as they adopt a more entrepreneurial mindset in land management. The results point to an urgent need for institutional reforms, such as completing the land registry, simplifying land transfer procedures, and promoting land consolidation policies. Overall, this exploratory study underscores the need for increased research attention to the formal and informal institutional elements that influence rural economic and structural development through land mobility, providing important insights for policies aimed to enhance land mobility and ensure the sustainable development of the agricultural sector. Furthermore, it provides valuable input for understanding and addressing challenges such as family traditions, emotional attachments to inherited land, and land mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilias Makris & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Vasileios Giannopoulos & Panos Dimitrakopoulos & Panagiotis Charalampakis, 2025. "The Impact of Formal and Informal Institutional Elements on Land Mobility Within Rural Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4412-:d:1654407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Vranken, Liesbet & Swinnen, Johan, 2006. "Land rental markets in transition: Theory and evidence from Hungary," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 481-500, March.
    3. Cleo Maria Gaganis & Andreas Y. Troumbis & Themistoklis Kontos, 2024. "Leveraging Reed Bed Burnings as Indicators of Wetland Conversion in Modern Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Geoghegan, Cathal & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2018. "Socioeconomic drivers of land mobility in Irish agriculture," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 7(2), December.
    5. Simões, Francisco & Unay-Gailhard, Ilkay & Mujčinović, Alen & Fernandes, Bernardo, 2021. "How to foster rural sustainability through farming workforce rejuvenation? Looking into involuntary newcomers’ spatial (im)mobilities," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(15).
    6. Van Hung, Pham & MacAulay, T. Gordon & Marsh, Sally P., 2007. "The economics of land fragmentation in the north of Vietnam," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(2), pages 1-17.
    7. Tasso Adamopoulos & Diego Restuccia, 2020. "Land Reform and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Micro Data," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 1-39, July.
    8. Gottlieb, Charles & Grobovšek, Jan, 2019. "Communal land and agricultural productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-152.
    9. Pitson, Christine & Bijttebier, Jo & Appel, Franziska & Balmann, Alfons, 2020. "How much farm succession is needed to ensure resilience of farming systems?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 37-44.
    10. Pechrová, Marie Šimpachová & Šimpach, Ondřej, 2020. "Entry Barriers for Young Farmers – Do They Depend on The Size of The Holding?," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311218, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    11. Osei-Tutu, Paul & Pregernig, Michael & Pokorny, Benno, 2015. "Interactions between formal and informal institutions in community, private and state forest contexts in Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 26-35.
    12. Ortyl, Bernadetta & Kasprzyk, Idalia & Jadczyszyn, Jan, 2024. "Trends and drivers of land abandonment in Poland under Common Agricultural Policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    13. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia, 2020. "The factors influencing the profitability of leased land on dairy farms in Ireland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Padmini Pani, 2016. "Controlling gully erosion: an analysis of land reclamation processes in Chambal Valley, India," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 1047-1059, November.
    15. José María Tubío-Sánchez & Francisco Ónega-López & Wim Timmermans & Rafael Crecente-Maseda, 2013. "Institutional Change in Land Planning: Two Cases from Galicia," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1276-1296, August.
    16. Klaus Deininger & Daniel Monchuk & Hari K Nagarajan & Sudhir K Singh, 2017. "Does Land Fragmentation Increase the Cost of Cultivation? Evidence from India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 82-98, January.
    17. Salvioni, Cristina & Ascione, Elisa & Henke, Roberto, 2013. "Structural and economic dynamics in diversified Italian farms," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Gao, Liangliang & Sun, Dingqiang & Huang, Jikun, 2017. "Impact of land tenure policy on agricultural investments in China: Evidence from a panel data study," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 244-252.
    19. Carolina Perpiña Castillo & Eloína Coll Aliaga & Carlo Lavalle & José Carlos Martínez Llario, 2020. "An Assessment and Spatial Modelling of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Spain (2015–2030)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Christine Pitson & Jo Bijttebier & Franziska Appel & Alfons Balmann, 2020. "How Much Farm Succession is Needed to Ensure Resilience of Farming Systems?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 37-44, August.
    21. Francisco Simões & Ilkay Unay-Gailhard & Alen Mujčinović & Bernardo Fernandes, 2021. "How to Foster Rural Sustainability through Farming Workforce Rejuvenation? Looking into Involuntary Newcomers’ Spatial (Im)mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    22. Matthew Rabin & Joel L. Schrag, 1999. "First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(1), pages 37-82.
    23. Douglass C. North & Robert Paul Thomas, 1970. "An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 23(1), pages 1-17, April.
    24. Tammi S. Feltham & Glenn Feltham & James J. Barnett, 2005. "The Dependence of Family Businesses on a Single Decision‐Maker," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 1-15, January.
    25. Cienciała, Agnieszka & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Sobura, Szymon, 2021. "Credibility of the cadastral data on land use and the methodology for their verification and update," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    26. Pham Van Hung & T. Gordon MacAulay & Sally P. Marsh, 2007. "The economics of land fragmentation in the north of Vietnam ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(2), pages 195-211, June.
    27. Maria Tsiouni & Stamatis Aggelopoulos & Alexandra Pavloudi & Dario Siggia, 2021. "Economic and Financial Sustainability Dependency on Subsidies: The Case of Goat Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    28. Alaa Al-Tulaibawi & Pablo de Frutos Madrazo & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2024. "Waqf : An Advanced Approach to Combating Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Islamic Countries," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, December.
    29. Lili Geng & Shaocong Yan & Qi Lu & Xiaomeng Liang & Yufei Li & Yongji Xue, 2023. "A Rural Land Share Cooperative System for Alleviating the Small, Scattered, and Weak Dilemma in Agricultural Development: The Cases of Tangyue, Zhouchong, and Chongzhou," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huy, Hoang Trieu & Nguyen, Trung Thanh, 2019. "Cropland rental market and farm technical efficiency in rural Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 408-423.
    2. Do, Manh Hung & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2023. "Land consolidation, rice production, and agricultural transformation: Evidence from household panel data for Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 157-173.
    3. Yishao Shi & Qianqian Yang & Liangliang Zhou & Shouzheng Shi, 2022. "Can Moderate Agricultural Scale Operations Be Developed against the Background of Plot Fragmentation and Land Dispersion? Evidence from the Suburbs of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Erwin Knippenberg & Dean Jolliffe & John Hoddinott, 2020. "Land Fragmentation and Food Insecurity in Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1557-1577, October.
    5. Huy, Hoang & Lyne, Michael & Ratna, Nazmun & Nuthall, Peter, 2013. "Efficiency And Equity Impacts Of The Rental Market For Cropland In Vietnam And Sources Of Transaction Costs Impeding The Market," 2013 Conference, August 28-30, 2013, Christchurch, New Zealand 160264, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Thomas Markussen & Finn Tarp & Do Huy Thiep & Nguyen Do Anh Tuan, 2016. "Inter- and intra-farm land fragmentation in Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-11, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Thomas Markussen & Finn Tarp & Do Huy Thiep & Nguyen Do Anh Tuan, 2016. "Inter- and intra-farm land fragmentation in Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series 011, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Trung Xuan Hoang, 2018. "Unexpected effects of land fragmentation," WIDER Working Paper Series 125, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Trung Xuan Hoang, 2018. "Unexpected effects of land fragmentation," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-125, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Le, Kien, 2020. "Land use restrictions, misallocation in agriculture, and aggregate productivity in Vietnam," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Manh Hung Do & Trung Thanh Nguyen & Ulrike Grote, 2022. "Is land consolidation policy a solution for rice production and agricultural transformation in Vietnam?," TVSEP Working Papers wp-028, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Project TVSEP.
    12. Phan, Phuc Van & O’Brien, Martin, 2022. "Is small beautiful? An empirical analysis of land characteristics and rural household income in Vietnam," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(03), January.
    13. Phuc Van Phan & Martin O'Brien, 2022. "Is small beautiful? An empirical analysis of land characteristics and rural household income in Vietnam," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(3), pages 561-580, July.
    14. Trung X. Hoang & Nga V. T. Le, 2021. "Natural disasters and risk aversion: Evidence from Vietnam," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(3), pages 211-229, August.
    15. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    16. Julián Arteaga & Nicolás de Roux & Margarita Gáfaro & Ana María Ibáñez & Heitor S. Pellegrina, 2025. "Farm Size Distribution, Weather Shocks, and Agricultural Productivity," Borradores de Economia 1305, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    17. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia & Loughrey, Jason, 2023. "The impact of long-term land leases on farm investment: Evidence from the Irish dairy sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Latruffe, Laure & Piet, Laurent, 2013. "Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany," Factor Markets Working Papers 151, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    19. Kawasaki, Kentaro, 2010. "The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 1-18.
    20. Yen H. T. Nguyen & Tuyen Q. Tran & Dung T. Hoang & Thu M. T. Tran & Trung T. Nguyen, 2023. "Land quality, income, and poverty among rural households in the North Central Region, Vietnam," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 150-172, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4412-:d:1654407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.