IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4409-d1654370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Synergistic Effect of the Dual Carbon Reduction Pilot on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Manufacturing Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Guantai Wu

    (Business School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)

  • Chaowei Feng

    (Business School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)

  • Shixian Ling

    (Business School, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)

Abstract

In recent years, a pressing global challenge has been that increasingly stringent environmental regulations have failed to prevent global climate change. In this context, exploring the synergistic effects of a policy mix approach has emerged as a promising strategy to turn the tide. Given that companies are the primary sources of carbon emissions, this study adopts a novel micro-level perspective. It employs the difference-in-differences method and establishes a two-way fixed effects model to empirically examine the interactive effects of the Low-Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) and the Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot (CETP) on corporate low-carbon development. Based on data availability and relevance, it uses a sample of Chinese listed industrial companies in 2007–2020. The findings indicate that the CETP enhances corporate carbon performance, whereas the LCCP has no significant impact on its own. However, the combined implementation of the two policies has resulted in a synergistic effect, with green innovation playing a mediating role in this process. The study also identifies the presence of a “green paradox” under heavily polluting industries and a weakening of the policies’ effectiveness in Western China and among non-high-tech firms. For emerging countries undergoing low-carbon transitions, it is essential to design context-specific policy combinations that maximize the effectiveness of environmental regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Guantai Wu & Chaowei Feng & Shixian Ling, 2025. "The Synergistic Effect of the Dual Carbon Reduction Pilot on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4409-:d:1654370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustafsson, Bo, 1998. "Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 259-274, February.
    2. Steven Sorrell, 2003. "Carbon Trading in the Policy Mix," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 420-437.
    3. Krysiak, Frank C., 2011. "Environmental regulation, technological diversity, and the dynamics of technological change," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 528-544, April.
    4. Chong Zhuo & Yaobin Liu & Ling Dai & Yuyang Deng, 2024. "Cultural, Economic, or Transport Link: Does Carbon Emissions Trading Promote “Good Neighbor” Carbon Emission Reduction?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Shaojian Chen & Hui Mao & Junqin Sun, 2022. "Low-Carbon City Construction and Corporate Carbon Reduction Performance: Evidence From a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 125-143, September.
    6. Chen, Xing & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Towards carbon neutrality by implementing carbon emissions trading scheme: Policy evaluation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Montgomery, W. David, 1972. "Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 395-418, December.
    8. Yang, Lisha & Li, Yutianhao & Liu, Hongxun, 2021. "Did carbon trade improve green production performance? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Wang, Juling & Liu, Lihua & Ou, Yangchao, 2024. "Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental violations: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Kangkang Zhang & Deyi Xu & Shiran Li & Na Zhou & Jinhui Xiong, 2019. "Has China’s Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Influenced the Carbon Intensity of Output?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Hong, Qianqian & Cui, Linhao & Hong, Penghui, 2022. "The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China's carbon emissions trading pilot," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Jaehn, Florian & Letmathe, Peter, 2010. "The emissions trading paradox," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 248-254, April.
    13. Hahn, Robert W & Stavins, Robert N, 1992. "Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Integrating Theory and Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 464-468, May.
    14. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    15. Nan Li & Huilin Zhang & Xiangyan Zhang & Xin Xie, 2025. "Does Market-Based Environmental Regulatory Policy Improve Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from Carbon Emission Trading in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Wang, Xiaoyin & Gao, Cuiyun, 2024. "Does green finance policy help to improve carbon reduction welfare performance? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Yang, Zhenbing & Fan, Meiting & Shao, Shuai & Yang, Lili, 2017. "Does carbon intensity constraint policy improve industrial green production performance in China? A quasi-DID analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 271-282.
    18. Runguo Xu & Ugur Korkut Pata & Jiapeng Dai, 2024. "Sustainable Growth through Green Electricity Transition and Environmental Regulations: Do Risks Associated with Corruption and Bureaucracy Matter?," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(Spec.issu), pages 228-254.
    19. Pan, An & Zhang, Wenna & Shi, Xunpeng & Dai, Ling, 2022. "Climate policy and low-carbon innovation: Evidence from low-carbon city pilots in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2011. "Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 122-144, March.
    21. Yang, Zhenbing & Shao, Shuai & Yang, Lili, 2021. "Unintended consequences of carbon regulation on the performance of SOEs in China: The role of technical efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    22. repec:prg:jnlpol:v:2024:y:2024:i:2:id:1420:p:228-254 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Li, Shengnan & Zheng, Xinya & Liao, Jing & Niu, Jianbo, 2024. "Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1248-1266.
    24. Shanshan Liu & Yugang Li, 2024. "Exploration or Exploitation? Corporate Green Innovation Strategy for Carbon Emission Reduction-Evidence from Pilot Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    25. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2008. "Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 15(4), pages 360-394, August.
    26. He, Wenjian & Wang, Xiaodong & Miao, Miao, 2024. "Network infrastructure and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from “Broadband China”," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    27. Muhammad Akhtar & Kong Yusheng & Muhammad Haris & Qurat Ul Ain & Hafiz Mustansar Javaid, 2022. "Impact of financial leverage on sustainable growth, market performance, and profitability," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 737-774, May.
    28. Yang, Shubo & Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib, 2023. "How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuzhang & Wang, Shuo & Wang, Xinjie, 2025. "Green mergers and acquisitions in corporate low-carbon transition: A driving mechanism based on dual external pressures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Wang, Zhenzhen & Zhou, Feite & Zhong, Junhao, 2024. "Can China's low-carbon city pilot policy facilitate carbon neutrality? Evidence from a machine learning approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 756-773.
    3. Gao, Xing & Lai, Xinjie & Tang, Xuan & Li, Yue, 2024. "Does environmental regulation affect corporate environmental awareness? A quasi-natural experiment based on low-carbon city pilot policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1164-1184.
    4. Jinchao Huang & Shuang Meng & Jiajie Yu, 2023. "The Effects of the Low-Carbon Pilot City Program on Green Innovation: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Kempa, Karol & Moslener, Ulf, 2015. "Climate policy with the chequebook: Economic considerations on climate investment support," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 219, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    6. Xuehui Yang & Jiaping Zhang & Lehua Bi & Yiming Jiang, 2023. "Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Wang, Juling & Liu, Lihua & Ou, Yangchao, 2024. "Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental violations: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Hu, Yucai & Li, Ranran & Du, Lei & Ren, Shenggang & Chevallier, Julien, 2022. "Could SO2 and CO2 emissions trading schemes achieve co-benefits of emissions reduction?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Jia, Zhijie & Wen, Shiyan, 2024. "Interaction effects of market-based and incentive-driven low-carbon policies on carbon emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Huang, Xuhui & Zhou, Tao & Zhang, Ning, 2025. "How does the carbon market influence the marginal abatement cost? Evidence from China's coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    11. Wu, Shu & Hu, Fangfang & Zhang, Zhijian, 2024. "Visible hand or invisible hand in climate governance? Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Fengxue Yin & Yanling Xiao & Rui Cao & Jianhua Zhang, 2023. "Impacts of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Carbon Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Stavins, Robert, 2001. "Lessons From the American Experiment With Market-Based Environmental Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-53, Resources for the Future.
    14. Wang, Lisha & Pan, Minjie & Qian, Xinlei & Lv, Kangjuan, 2025. "Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Robert N. Stavins, 1998. "What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 69-88, Summer.
    16. Adrian Amelung, 2016. "Das "Paris-Agreement": Durchbruch der Top-Down-Klimaschutzverhandlungen im Kreise der Vereinten Nationen," Otto-Wolff-Institut Discussion Paper Series 03/2016, Otto-Wolff-Institut für Wirtschaftsordnung, Köln, Deutschland.
    17. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2019. "Environmental Regulation and Export Product Quality: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 19-14, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    18. Tang, Ling & Shi, Jiarui & Bao, Qin, 2016. "Designing an emissions trading scheme for China with a dynamic computable general equilibrium model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 507-520.
    19. Hao, Xiaoli & Li, Ke & Ren, Siyu & Sun, Qingyu & Hu, Weitao & Xue, Yan, 2024. "How green investment significantly relieves resource curse? A new perspective from fiscal decentralization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Edenhofer, Ottmar & Lessmann, Kai, 2013. "Renewable energy subsidies: Second-best policy or fatal aberration for mitigation?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 217-234.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4409-:d:1654370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.