IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3836-d1388022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phosphate Removal Efficiency and Life Cycle Assessment of Different Anode Materials in Electrocoagulation Treatment of Wastewater

Author

Listed:
  • Guangpu Li

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Bin Zheng

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Wenqing Zhang

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Qiaona Liu

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Mingzheng Li

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Haibing Zhang

    (Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

Abstract

The excessive discharge of phosphorus-containing wastewater contributes to eutrophication, posing a serious threat to aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, methods such as electrocoagulation should be utilized to remove phosphorus from wastewater prior to discharging it into a water body. In this study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of electrocoagulation in treating simulated phosphorus-containing wastewater under different parameters, including anode material (aluminum, iron, and magnesium), electrode distance (ED) (1, 2.5, and 4.5 cm), pH (3, 6, and 9), and current density (CD) (3, 6, and 9 mA/cm 2 ). Additionally, three models of phosphate removal, the pseudo-first-order (PFO), pseudo-second-order (PSO), and Behnajady–Modirshahla–Ghanbery (BMG) models, were used to simulate the relationship between phosphate concentration and time in the electrocoagulation process using the three metals for phosphate removal. The experimental results showed that the aluminum system had the highest removal efficiency (90%) when energized for 20 min under a CD of 3 mA/cm 2 , followed by those of the iron (80%) and magnesium (35%) systems. Furthermore, a life cycle assessment (LCA) showed that the aluminum electrode system had a smaller environmental impact than the iron and magnesium electrode systems. Therefore, the aluminum electrode system is suitable for phosphorus removal from wastewater.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangpu Li & Bin Zheng & Wenqing Zhang & Qiaona Liu & Mingzheng Li & Haibing Zhang, 2024. "Phosphate Removal Efficiency and Life Cycle Assessment of Different Anode Materials in Electrocoagulation Treatment of Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3836-:d:1388022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3836-:d:1388022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.