IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p3083-d1371789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Mercury Pollution of Hainan Island, China: Patterns, Influencing Factors, and Health Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Sun

    (College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China
    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China)

  • Canchao Yang

    (College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China
    Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China)

Abstract

Due to the rapid expansion of tourism, mining, and manufacturing, the economy of Hainan Island in southern China has experienced swift growth. However, it also brings the risk of soil pollution by mercury (Hg) as a result of increased traffic and mineral processing activities. In order to investigate the characteristics of soil Hg pollution in Hainan Island and assess the health risk, a total of 239 samples were gathered from five representative regions across the island. The findings indicate considerable fluctuations in the soil Hg concentration across the five sub-study areas, which are influenced by factors such as wind direction, mining activities, and economic development. Changjiang Li Autonomous County, situated in the downwind direction (NW) and rich in mineral resources, shows the highest soil Hg concentration (10.00–1582.50 ng·g −1 ). Following closely are Haikou and Sanya, the two most economically developed cities on the island, with soil Hg concentrations of 8.33–321.50 ng·g −1 and 6.04–180.50 ng·g −1 , respectively. Wuzhishan Nature Reserve and Lingshui Li Autonomous County, located in the upwind area (SE), show the lowest concentrations, ranging between 10.70–104.67 ng·g −1 and 9.43–84.00 ng·g −1 , respectively. Both the Single Pollution Index method and the Geo-accumulation Index method were employed to assess the level of Hg pollution. The results indicate that nearly half of the sampling sites are contaminated, in which the proportion of contaminated sites in Sanya and Haikou are the highest, but the level of contamination is low; the heavily contaminated sites are predominantly found in Changjiang Li Autonomous County. However, the low Health Risk Index (HI) ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0334 suggests that although the soil is contaminated with Hg, it does not pose a substantial non-carcinogenic risk to human health.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Sun & Canchao Yang, 2024. "Soil Mercury Pollution of Hainan Island, China: Patterns, Influencing Factors, and Health Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3083-:d:1371789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3083/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3083/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qianru Man & Lijuan Xu & Mingfang Li, 2022. "Source Identification and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soil: A Case Study of Lintancang Plain, Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3083-:d:1371789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.