IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2984-d1369527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Gaps between Engineering Graduates and Quantity Surveyors of Construction Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Zhang

    (School of Materials and Architectural Engineering, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Shuai-Ge Ma

    (School of Materials and Architectural Engineering, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Ying Sun

    (School of Materials and Architectural Engineering, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yue-Nan Zhao

    (School of Materials and Architectural Engineering, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Meeting the future workforce demands of the construction industry is defined as one of the main paths for sustainable engineering education. Quantity surveyors play a crucial role in driving the digital transformation of the construction industry. There is a pressing need to cultivate a significant number of engineering graduates who meet market demands to bolster the workforce of quantity surveyors for accomplishing this core mission. In this context, this study examined the main gaps existing between engineering graduates and quantity surveyors in terms of personal competencies needed to successfully value projects. Through the participation of 262 individuals (165 quantity surveyors and 97 engineering graduates), using a literature review, personal interviews, and a questionnaire survey, it was possible to assess five competencies (sustainable competency, budget competency, site management competency, engineering ethics, and settlement competency), and determine significant differences between both groups. All personal competencies’ mean scores are higher for quantity surveyors than for engineering graduates. Four competencies are found to differ significantly between quantity surveyors and engineering graduates: sustainable competency, budget competency, site management competency, and settlement competency. As the conclusion derived from this study, it is recommended to introduce market-oriented mechanisms and establish a dynamic engineering talent model driven by market demand through collaborative development involving school–enterprise partnerships and the integration of expertise and creativity, aiming to foster the development of social practice competency. Particular emphasis should be placed on strengthening budget competency, site management competency, and settlement competency. The findings guide the education, training, and practice of quantity surveying to deal with emerging challenges in the dynamic market demand in China and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Zhang & Shuai-Ge Ma & Ying Sun & Yue-Nan Zhao, 2024. "Investigating the Gaps between Engineering Graduates and Quantity Surveyors of Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2984-:d:1369527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2984-:d:1369527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.