IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2981-d1369493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Effects of Different Organic Amendments on the Immobilization and Phytoavailability of Lead

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojie Wang

    (College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
    School of Biological Engineering, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Jingwen Chen

    (College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
    School of Education, Luoyang Vocational College of Culture and Tourism, Luoyang 471000, China)

  • Jiahui An

    (College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)

  • Xueping Wang

    (College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)

  • Yun Shao

    (College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)

Abstract

Organic materials, such as straw, animal manure, and their processed product biochar, are known to exhibit agronomic effects and the ability to remediate heavy metal contamination. However, knowledge regarding the relative effects of different organic amendments in soils on heavy metal immobilization and phytoavailability remain limited. Consequently, the effects of maize straw (MS), chicken manure (CM), mushroom cultivation waste (MW), and sawdust biochar (SB) on the immobilization and phytoavailability of lead (Pb) in wheat plants were investigated in this study using pot experiments. The results showed that the artificial application of Pb reduced soil pH, while increasing the total organic carbon (TOC) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) to various extents. Furthermore, the Pb treatment increased the adsorption of Pb by wheat grains (0.83 mg∙kg −1 ), resulting in decreased above-ground dry biomass (43.16 g∙pot −1 ) during the maturity growth period when compared with the control check (CK) treatment. The MS + Pb and CM + Pb treatments increased the exchangeable Pb fractions in the soil, but had a limited effect on Pb accumulation in wheat grains compared with the Pb treatment. In contrast, the SB + Pb treatment effectively increased soil pH and TOC, while decreasing the fraction of exchangeable Pb forms and increasing the oxidizable and residual Pb fractions, compared with the Pb treatment. Moreover, the MW + Pb treatment also increased the soil pH and CEC, displaying the potential to increase soil TOC, in addition to substantially modifying the portioning of Pb from exchangeable forms to less bioavailable fractions. Both the MW and SB amendments significantly reduced Pb concentrations in wheat grains (0.49 and 0.70 mg∙kg −1 ,∙respectively), resulting in increased above-ground dry biomass (51.59 and 54.12 g∙pot −1 , respectively). In summary, the application of organic amendments, especially MW, could be an effective measure for enhancing Pb immobilization in polluted soils, thereby reducing its uptake and translocation to crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojie Wang & Jingwen Chen & Jiahui An & Xueping Wang & Yun Shao, 2024. "Comparison of the Effects of Different Organic Amendments on the Immobilization and Phytoavailability of Lead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2981-:d:1369493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2981-:d:1369493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.