IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2490-d1358699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Vulnerability Assessment of the Human Settlements along the Beibu Gulf Coast of Guangxi, China

Author

Listed:
  • Huirong Chen

    (School of Resources and Environment, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011, China)

  • Jianzhong Yang

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011, China)

  • Jinliang Wang

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650054, China)

Abstract

Human settlement development is intricately linked to production and life, and development quality is a partial indicator of the local community’s social, economic, cultural, and environmental progress. Furthermore, the human settlements’ vulnerability affects their sustainable development potential. Due to the “One Belt, One Road” initiative and land and sea corridor development in southwestern China, the Beibu Gulf coast in Guangxi is the sole waterway bridgehead used by China for opening trade with ASEAN. By examining the region’s human settlements and its potential for sustainable development, we established a benchmark for the region’s seaward economy and human settlements to achieve synergistic progress, as well as to enhance regional integration. Based on the systematic evaluation of the quality of human settlements along the Beibu Gulf coast in Guangxi, the vulnerability assessment model of human settlement was adopted to analyse the vulnerability and spatial–temporal patterns of nearby human settlements in 2010–2019, while the multiple linear regression model was used to explore their influencing factors. Our findings indicate that the quality of human settlements in the study area has experienced three distinct stages. In the early stage (2010–2012), we noted an overall year-on-year increase in settlement quality. However, in the middle stage (2013–2016), Fangchenggang and Beihai experienced a decline followed by an increase, while Qinzhou demonstrated a steady growth in settlement quality. Qinzhou continued to experience growth, albeit at a slower rate, while Fangchenggang’s rate of increase surpassed that of Beihai. The human settlements’ high-quality centre shifted between Qinzhou and Fangchenggang in the late stage (2017–2019). Additionally, in recent years, the settlements’ high-quality centre has shifted towards the western part of the region. The habitat’s sensitivity has grown slowly, as has the responsiveness index, but the vulnerability index continues to decline, and it is characterised by a spatial differentiation ranging from low to high values in a centre–east–west direction. The region’s human settlement quality is primarily influenced by economic development. The region’s habitat vulnerability is primarily caused by responsibility, and the primary factors affecting responsibility are regional imbalances in social service development, the population’s welfare, and employment and infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Huirong Chen & Jianzhong Yang & Jinliang Wang, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Vulnerability Assessment of the Human Settlements along the Beibu Gulf Coast of Guangxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2490-:d:1358699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abraham R Matamanda, 2020. "Battling the informal settlement challenge through sustainable city framework: experiences and lessons from Harare, Zimbabwe," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 217-231, March.
    2. Ying Zhang & Zhiqiang Fang & Zhongqi Xie, 2023. "Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Human Settlement Environments and Resident Demand: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Chunmei Zhang & Lingen Wang, 2023. "Evaluating the Health of Urban Human Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Feifei Wu & Xiaohua Yang & Bing Lian & Yan Wang & Jing Kang, 2023. "Suitability Evaluation of Human Settlements Using a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chirisa, Innocent & Matamanda, Abraham R. & Mazanhi, Patience, 2020. "Resisting, frustrating or embracing the urban agenda: Chieftaincies in Southern Africa examined constitutionally and statutorily," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Wenqing Fu & Renfeng Ma & Xianjun Liang & Yiran Zhao & Lingzhi Wu & Maoyu Luo & Yanjun Mao, 2023. "Perception Analysis of the Transformation from a Fishery-Led to Industry-Led Island with its Human Settlement Changes: A Case Study of Liuheng Island, Zhoushan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Qingqing Yang & Yanhui Gao & Xiaoshu Cao & Jie Yang, 2023. "Contributions and Resistances to Vulnerability of Rural Human Settlements System in Agricultural Areas of Chinese Loess Plateau since 1980," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    4. Chunmei Zhang & Jun Yang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Quality of the Age-Friendly Environment in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Pauline C Cherunya & Bernhard Truffer & Edinah Moraa Samuel & Christoph Lüthi, 2021. "The challenges of livelihoods reconstruction in the context of informal settlement upgrading," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 168-190, February.
    6. Matamanda, Abraham R. & Chinozvina, Queen L., 2020. "Driving Forces of Citizen Participation in Urban Development Practice in Harare, Zimbabwe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2490-:d:1358699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.