IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2232-d1352704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

App-Based Digital Health Equity Determinants According to Ecological Models: Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Na-Young Park

    (Department of Health Care Policy Research, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Sejong 30147, Republic of Korea)

  • Sarang Jang

    (Department of Public Health, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Technological advances have increased the availability of diverse digital health services. However, digital health benefits are not equally accessible. Recent studies have focused on digital health equity. Researchers are progressively identifying digital determinants of health (DDoH) to address potential health disparities stemming from digital health. This study investigated the determinants of disparities in app-based digital health within the framework of an ecological model. The method proposed by Arksey and O’Malley was adopted in this review. The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched from January 2016 to December 2021. Two reviewers independently screened and selected topics according to the guidelines for the scope of the topic. A consensus was reached to reconcile the differences, and the findings were collated, synthesized, summarized, and reported. This study identified 21 studies pertaining to health equity in app-based digital health. Seven countries were included in this study. Health inequities caused by the adoption of app-based digital health can be reflected in the following three levels according to the ecological model. At the individual level (N = 20), it was influenced by sociodemographic characteristics and digital literacy factors. At the interpersonal level (N = 10), factors such as feedback mechanisms, monitoring, communication modalities, technology-sharing practices, and standardized design were observed. At the community or social level (N = 7), disparities were noted in residential locality, integrated network infrastructure, and Internet accessibility. Finally, digital health policies should consider determinants of digital health inequalities. Ensuring health equity in digital health requires the equitable implementation and measurement of health outcomes through an equity lens. Based on the findings of this study, it is essential to maintain a continued focus on digital health to prevent the further widening of health disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Na-Young Park & Sarang Jang, 2024. "App-Based Digital Health Equity Determinants According to Ecological Models: Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2232-:d:1352704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenny Luo & Shelley White-Means, 2021. "Evaluating the Potential Use of Smartphone Apps for Diabetes Self-Management in an Underserved Population: A Qualitative Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2232-:d:1352704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.